@database "IMAGINE MAILING LIST" @WIDTH 80 @font topaz.font 8 @index Index @toc contents @node MAIN "IMAGINE MAILING LIST NUMBER V59" @toc contents @{b} This GUIDE File was generated by an @{ub} @{b} IMAGINE MAILING LIST PROCESSOR @{ub} @{b} Written By Joop van de Wege @{ub} @{b} © 1994 @{ub} \|/ @ @ +---------------------------------oOO-(_)-OOo---------------------------------+ | | | This is the Imagine Mailing List (imagine@email.sp.paramax.com) Archive #59 | | covering messages from Feb 01 1995 to Mar 01 1995. | | | | If you have any questions or problems with this file, E-mail Nik Vukovljak | | at nvukovlj@extro.ucc.su.oz.au | | To join the IML, send email to: imagine-request@email.sp.paramax.com and in | | the subject line type in: subscribe | | | | Thanks goes to: Neil Miller for the Imagine Mailing List Processor | | Nik Vukovljak for the archives | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ @{" Turn the Page " link contents} @endnode MAIN @node contents "IMAGINE MAILING LIST V59- CONTENTS" Click-->@{" 1 " link IML-1} MSG- 1 Subject: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Click-->@{" 2 " link IML-2} MSG- 2 Subject: Re: 3d Stereograms (Fwd) Click-->@{" 3 " link IML-3} MSG- 3 Subject: Re: imagine Click-->@{" 4 " link IML-4} MSG- 4 ------=> Sorry NO Subject! Click-->@{" 5 " link IML-5} MSG- 5 Subject: Sway FX Click-->@{" 6 " link IML-6} MSG- 6 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Click-->@{" 7 " link IML-7} MSG- 7 Subject: Re: Imagine L/T Click-->@{" 8 " link IML-8} MSG- 8 Subject: RE: Imagine Under MS-DOS Click-->@{" 9 " link IML-9} MSG- 9 Subject: Re: Imagine and GVP '040 Click-->@{" 10 " link IML-10} MSG- 10 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Click-->@{" 11 " link IML-11} MSG- 11 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Click-->@{" 12 " link IML-12} MSG- 12 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Click-->@{" 13 " link IML-13} MSG- 13 Subject: Re: Clouds (again!) Click-->@{" 14 " link IML-14} MSG- 14 ------=> Sorry NO Subject! Click-->@{" 15 " link IML-15} MSG- 15 ------=> Sorry NO Subject! Click-->@{" 16 " link IML-16} MSG- 16 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Click-->@{" 17 " link IML-17} MSG- 17 Subject: Imagine Launched with ToolManager Click-->@{" 18 " link IML-18} MSG- 18 Subject: Re: Im2.0 PC Click-->@{" 19 " link IML-19} MSG- 19 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Ima Click-->@{" 20 " link IML-20} MSG- 20 ------=> Sorry NO Subject! Click-->@{" 21 " link IML-21} MSG- 21 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Click-->@{" 22 " link IML-22} MSG- 22 Subject: Creating a good smoke effect... Click-->@{" 23 " link IML-23} MSG- 23 Subject: Xparent objects cutting holes Click-->@{" 24 " link IML-24} MSG- 24 Subject: Imagine L/T Final question... Click-->@{" 25 " link IML-25} MSG- 25 Subject: Imagine L/T: Thanx for help! Click-->@{" 26 " link IML-26} MSG- 26 Subject: T3DLIB R433 Released Click-->@{" 27 " link IML-27} MSG- 27 Subject: Digimax and other digitizer Click-->@{" 28 " link IML-28} MSG- 28 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Click-->@{" 29 " link IML-29} MSG- 29 Subject: Re: Xparent objects cutting holes Click-->@{" 30 " link IML-30} MSG- 30 Subject: A2000 '40 boards Click-->@{" 31 " link IML-31} MSG- 31 Subject: IMAGINE L/T FINAL QUESTIO Click-->@{" 32 " link IML-32} MSG- 32 Subject: Starfield Object Click-->@{" 33 " link IML-33} MSG- 33 Subject: Materials Click-->@{" 34 " link IML-34} MSG- 34 Subject: Re: T3DLIB R43 Released Click-->@{" 35 " link IML-35} MSG- 35 Subject: Ian Smiths Starfield util Click-->@{" 36 " link IML-36} MSG- 36 Subject: LHA objects again!!! Click-->@{" 37 " link IML-37} MSG- 37 Subject: Dust 1.43 Click-->@{" 38 " link IML-38} MSG- 38 Subject: Creating a good smoke effect... (fwd) Click-->@{" 39 " link IML-39} MSG- 39 Subject: Materials Click-->@{" 40 " link IML-40} MSG- 40 Subject: Modeling strategy Click-->@{" 41 " link IML-41} MSG- 41 Subject: Re: Prostitutes can, why can't shareware authors? Click-->@{" 42 " link IML-42} MSG- 42 Subject: Real full transparency (was: photon torpedos) Click-->@{" 43 " link IML-43} MSG- 43 Subject: Screenmode Promotion Click-->@{" 44 " link IML-44} MSG- 44 Subject: Re: Photon torpedo? Click-->@{" 45 " link IML-45} MSG- 45 Subject: Sway FX Click-->@{" 46 " link IML-46} MSG- 46 Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util Click-->@{" 47 " link IML-47} MSG- 47 Subject: IMAGINE, DIGIMAX & PC Interrupts Click-->@{" 48 " link IML-48} MSG- 48 Subject: Neuron image (short) Click-->@{" 49 " link IML-49} MSG- 49 Subject: Re: Screenmode Promotion Click-->@{" 50 " link IML-50} MSG- 50 Subject: Virtual Memory Click-->@{" 51 " link IML-51} MSG- 51 Subject: Imagine2.0 pc book Click-->@{" 52 " link IML-52} MSG- 52 Subject: Re: Materials Click-->@{" 53 " link IML-53} MSG- 53 Subject: Re: Screenmode Promotion Click-->@{" 54 " link IML-54} MSG- 54 Subject: Re: PC Imagine Objects from A... Click-->@{" 55 " link IML-55} MSG- 55 Subject: CONFIG.SYS Click-->@{" 56 " link IML-56} MSG- 56 Subject: Working with bitmaps Click-->@{" 57 " link IML-57} MSG- 57 Subject: Re: Materials Click-->@{" 58 " link IML-58} MSG- 58 Subject: Archives... Click-->@{" 59 " link IML-59} MSG- 59 Subject: Thanks Click-->@{" 60 " link IML-60} MSG- 60 Subject: Grow f/x problem Click-->@{" 61 " link IML-61} MSG- 61 Subject: Re:lha again! Click-->@{" 62 " link IML-62} MSG- 62 Subject: Re:lha again! Click-->@{" 63 " link IML-63} MSG- 63 Subject: Re: Thanks Click-->@{" 64 " link IML-64} MSG- 64 Subject: Re: Photon torpedo? Click-->@{" 65 " link IML-65} MSG- 65 Subject: Moving cloth Click-->@{" 66 " link IML-66} MSG- 66 Subject: Neuron image (short) Click-->@{" 67 " link IML-67} MSG- 67 Subject: Re: Creating a good smoke effect... Click-->@{" 68 " link IML-68} MSG- 68 Subject: Re: Materials Click-->@{" 69 " link IML-69} MSG- 69 Subject: Cuttings?? Click-->@{" 70 " link IML-70} MSG- 70 Subject: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 71 " link IML-71} MSG- 71 Subject: More Imagine Textures Click-->@{" 72 " link IML-72} MSG- 72 Subject: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 73 " link IML-73} MSG- 73 Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util Click-->@{" 74 " link IML-74} MSG- 74 Subject: Re: moving cloth Click-->@{" 75 " link IML-75} MSG- 75 Subject: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 76 " link IML-76} MSG- 76 Subject: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 77 " link IML-77} MSG- 77 Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util Click-->@{" 78 " link IML-78} MSG- 78 Subject: Re: moving cloth (fwd) Click-->@{" 79 " link IML-79} MSG- 79 Subject: Bouncy, bouncy, bouncy... Click-->@{" 80 " link IML-80} MSG- 80 Subject: Re: Materials Click-->@{" 81 " link IML-81} MSG- 81 Subject: Particles effect HELP!? Click-->@{" 82 " link IML-82} MSG- 82 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 83 " link IML-83} MSG- 83 Subject: Fog objects and global fog Click-->@{" 84 " link IML-84} MSG- 84 Subject: Re: Materials Click-->@{" 85 " link IML-85} MSG- 85 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 86 " link IML-86} MSG- 86 Subject: Sway FX Click-->@{" 87 " link IML-87} MSG- 87 Subject: I'm not receiving the IML Click-->@{" 88 " link IML-88} MSG- 88 Subject: Re: Particles effect HELP!? Click-->@{" 89 " link IML-89} MSG- 89 Subject: Imagine TIF's Click-->@{" 90 " link IML-90} MSG- 90 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Click-->@{" 91 " link IML-91} MSG- 91 Subject: Address needed Click-->@{" 92 " link IML-92} MSG- 92 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 93 " link IML-93} MSG- 93 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 94 " link IML-94} MSG- 94 Subject: Re: Imagine TIF's Click-->@{" 95 " link IML-95} MSG- 95 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Click-->@{" 96 " link IML-96} MSG- 96 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 97 " link IML-97} MSG- 97 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 98 " link IML-98} MSG- 98 Subject: Aminet Click-->@{" 99 " link IML-99} MSG- 99 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 100 " link IML-100} MSG- 100 Subject: Function Key Favorite Click-->@{" 101 " link IML-101} MSG- 101 Subject: 3d job... Click-->@{" 102 " link IML-102} MSG- 102 Subject: Re: Creating a good smoke effect... Click-->@{" 103 " link IML-103} MSG- 103 Subject: Re: caustic Click-->@{" 104 " link IML-104} MSG- 104 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 105 " link IML-105} MSG- 105 ------=> Sorry NO Subject! Click-->@{" 106 " link IML-106} MSG- 106 Subject: RE: LW VS. IMAGINE Click-->@{" 107 " link IML-107} MSG- 107 Subject: Re: lha again! Click-->@{" 108 " link IML-108} MSG- 108 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 109 " link IML-109} MSG- 109 Subject: ISL(??) Click-->@{" 110 " link IML-110} MSG- 110 Subject: Re: lha again! Click-->@{" 111 " link IML-111} MSG- 111 Subject: Smoke tutorial? Click-->@{" 112 " link IML-112} MSG- 112 Subject: Re[2]: Creating a good smoke effect... Click-->@{" 113 " link IML-113} MSG- 113 Subject: 8-color Imagine Click-->@{" 114 " link IML-114} MSG- 114 Subject: Re: More Imagine Textures Click-->@{" 115 " link IML-115} MSG- 115 Subject: Imagine and lightwave Click-->@{" 116 " link IML-116} MSG- 116 Subject: 3D Artist magazine Click-->@{" 117 " link IML-117} MSG- 117 Subject: Re: RELAY BOUNCE Click-->@{" 118 " link IML-118} MSG- 118 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 119 " link IML-119} MSG- 119 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 120 " link IML-120} MSG- 120 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Click-->@{" 121 " link IML-121} MSG- 121 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 122 " link IML-122} MSG- 122 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Click-->@{" 123 " link IML-123} MSG- 123 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 124 " link IML-124} MSG- 124 Subject: Re: RELAY BOUNCE Click-->@{" 125 " link IML-125} MSG- 125 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 126 " link IML-126} MSG- 126 Subject: Re: lha again! Click-->@{" 127 " link IML-127} MSG- 127 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 128 " link IML-128} MSG- 128 Subject: Re: Function Key Favorite Click-->@{" 129 " link IML-129} MSG- 129 Subject: Re: Fog objects and global fog Click-->@{" 130 " link IML-130} MSG- 130 Subject: Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 131 " link IML-131} MSG- 131 Subject: RE: LHA AGAIN! Click-->@{" 132 " link IML-132} MSG- 132 Subject: Understanding Imagine 3.0 Click-->@{" 133 " link IML-133} MSG- 133 Subject: Re: lha again! Click-->@{" 134 " link IML-134} MSG- 134 Subject: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... Click-->@{" 135 " link IML-135} MSG- 135 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 136 " link IML-136} MSG- 136 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Click-->@{" 137 " link IML-137} MSG- 137 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 138 " link IML-138} MSG- 138 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 139 " link IML-139} MSG- 139 Subject: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 140 " link IML-140} MSG- 140 Subject: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 141 " link IML-141} MSG- 141 Subject: Graphics Click-->@{" 142 " link IML-142} MSG- 142 Subject: Re: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... Click-->@{" 143 " link IML-143} MSG- 143 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Click-->@{" 144 " link IML-144} MSG- 144 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 145 " link IML-145} MSG- 145 Subject: Re: 8-color Imagine Click-->@{" 146 " link IML-146} MSG- 146 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 147 " link IML-147} MSG- 147 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 148 " link IML-148} MSG- 148 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 149 " link IML-149} MSG- 149 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 150 " link IML-150} MSG- 150 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 151 " link IML-151} MSG- 151 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 152 " link IML-152} MSG- 152 Subject: Disco Ball Click-->@{" 153 " link IML-153} MSG- 153 Subject: Tree's Click-->@{" 154 " link IML-154} MSG- 154 Subject: Candle Click-->@{" 155 " link IML-155} MSG- 155 Subject: Add44k Click-->@{" 156 " link IML-156} MSG- 156 Subject: Imagine 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 157 " link IML-157} MSG- 157 Subject: Re: Tree's Click-->@{" 158 " link IML-158} MSG- 158 Subject: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 159 " link IML-159} MSG- 159 Subject: Imagine 3.1 states & textures Click-->@{" 160 " link IML-160} MSG- 160 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 161 " link IML-161} MSG- 161 Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine Click-->@{" 162 " link IML-162} MSG- 162 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 163 " link IML-163} MSG- 163 Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 164 " link IML-164} MSG- 164 Subject: I`ve got lots of PD XSpecs software for any who want it. Click-->@{" 165 " link IML-165} MSG- 165 Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine Click-->@{" 166 " link IML-166} MSG- 166 Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 167 " link IML-167} MSG- 167 Subject: Re: PD XSpecs software Click-->@{" 168 " link IML-168} MSG- 168 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.1 states & textures Click-->@{" 169 " link IML-169} MSG- 169 Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpecs software for any who want it. Click-->@{" 170 " link IML-170} MSG- 170 Subject: Re: where is add44k Click-->@{" 171 " link IML-171} MSG- 171 Subject: Help needed running Imagine on ATI Ultra Pro Click-->@{" 172 " link IML-172} MSG- 172 Subject: How to make a spaceship shield using Essence textures Click-->@{" 173 " link IML-173} MSG- 173 Subject: Particles help! Click-->@{" 174 " link IML-174} MSG- 174 Subject: Imagine 3.2 ? (fwd) Click-->@{" 175 " link IML-175} MSG- 175 Subject: RE: LW VS. IMAGINE Click-->@{" 176 " link IML-176} MSG- 176 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 177 " link IML-177} MSG- 177 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.1 states & textures Click-->@{" 178 " link IML-178} MSG- 178 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 179 " link IML-179} MSG- 179 Subject: Candle Click-->@{" 180 " link IML-180} MSG- 180 Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 181 " link IML-181} MSG- 181 Subject: Re: Help needed running Imagine on ATI Ultra Pro Click-->@{" 182 " link IML-182} MSG- 182 Subject: Re: Particles help! Click-->@{" 183 " link IML-183} MSG- 183 Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine(brushmap transparency "bug") Click-->@{" 184 " link IML-184} MSG- 184 Subject: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 185 " link IML-185} MSG- 185 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 186 " link IML-186} MSG- 186 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 187 " link IML-187} MSG- 187 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 188 " link IML-188} MSG- 188 Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine Click-->@{" 189 " link IML-189} MSG- 189 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 190 " link IML-190} MSG- 190 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 191 " link IML-191} MSG- 191 Subject: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 192 " link IML-192} MSG- 192 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 193 " link IML-193} MSG- 193 Subject: Re: IML tidbits (was Candle) Click-->@{" 194 " link IML-194} MSG- 194 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 195 " link IML-195} MSG- 195 Subject: Online Docs, was RE: Candle Click-->@{" 196 " link IML-196} MSG- 196 Subject: Good turbulent gas effect?? Click-->@{" 197 " link IML-197} MSG- 197 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 198 " link IML-198} MSG- 198 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 199 " link IML-199} MSG- 199 Subject: Re: Online Docs, was RE: Candle Click-->@{" 200 " link IML-200} MSG- 200 Subject: Textures Click-->@{" 201 " link IML-201} MSG- 201 Subject: 3D Artist Click-->@{" 202 " link IML-202} MSG- 202 Subject: Locomotive objects Click-->@{" 203 " link IML-203} MSG- 203 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 204 " link IML-204} MSG- 204 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 205 " link IML-205} MSG- 205 Subject: Re: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 206 " link IML-206} MSG- 206 Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine Click-->@{" 207 " link IML-207} MSG- 207 Subject: Imagine tidbits Click-->@{" 208 " link IML-208} MSG- 208 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 209 " link IML-209} MSG- 209 Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine(brushmap transparency "bug") Click-->@{" 210 " link IML-210} MSG- 210 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 211 " link IML-211} MSG- 211 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 212 " link IML-212} MSG- 212 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 213 " link IML-213} MSG- 213 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 214 " link IML-214} MSG- 214 Subject: Computer objects Click-->@{" 215 " link IML-215} MSG- 215 Subject: Re: Tree's Click-->@{" 216 " link IML-216} MSG- 216 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 217 " link IML-217} MSG- 217 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 218 " link IML-218} MSG- 218 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 219 " link IML-219} MSG- 219 Subject: PC Shareware?? other textures? Click-->@{" 220 " link IML-220} MSG- 220 Subject: How to books (was Re: Candle Click-->@{" 221 " link IML-221} MSG- 221 Subject: Re: Online Docs, was RE: Candle Click-->@{" 222 " link IML-222} MSG- 222 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 223 " link IML-223} MSG- 223 Subject: Imagine Cookbook Click-->@{" 224 " link IML-224} MSG- 224 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 225 " link IML-225} MSG- 225 Subject: Imagine Improvements was IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 226 " link IML-226} MSG- 226 Subject: Re[2]: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 227 " link IML-227} MSG- 227 Subject: Ideas on how to make chaotic cigarette smoke Click-->@{" 228 " link IML-228} MSG- 228 Subject: Re[2]: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 229 " link IML-229} MSG- 229 Subject: Imagine Tidbit Booklet Click-->@{" 230 " link IML-230} MSG- 230 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 231 " link IML-231} MSG- 231 Subject: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 232 " link IML-232} MSG- 232 Subject: RE: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 233 " link IML-233} MSG- 233 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 234 " link IML-234} MSG- 234 Subject: Re: Imagine Tidbit Booklet Click-->@{" 235 " link IML-235} MSG- 235 Subject: Re: Lha Archives Click-->@{" 236 " link IML-236} MSG- 236 Subject: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 237 " link IML-237} MSG- 237 Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpec... Click-->@{" 238 " link IML-238} MSG- 238 Subject: Re: Lha Archives Click-->@{" 239 " link IML-239} MSG- 239 Subject: Candle Click-->@{" 240 " link IML-240} MSG- 240 Subject: Re: Imagine Tidbit Booklet Click-->@{" 241 " link IML-241} MSG- 241 Subject: I/O Click-->@{" 242 " link IML-242} MSG- 242 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 243 " link IML-243} MSG- 243 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 244 " link IML-244} MSG- 244 Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpec... Click-->@{" 245 " link IML-245} MSG- 245 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 246 " link IML-246} MSG- 246 Subject: Amiga->PC textures? Click-->@{" 247 " link IML-247} MSG- 247 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 248 " link IML-248} MSG- 248 Subject: Newsletter Click-->@{" 249 " link IML-249} MSG- 249 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 250 " link IML-250} MSG- 250 Subject: I/O Click-->@{" 251 " link IML-251} MSG- 251 Subject: RE: IMAGINE COOKBOOK Click-->@{" 252 " link IML-252} MSG- 252 Subject: Forms Editor Tutorial (was: Imagine WWW site) Click-->@{" 253 " link IML-253} MSG- 253 Subject: Memory problem? Click-->@{" 254 " link IML-254} MSG- 254 Subject: Re: Memory problem? Click-->@{" 255 " link IML-255} MSG- 255 Subject: Re: Locomotive objects Click-->@{" 256 " link IML-256} MSG- 256 Subject: Upgrades?? Click-->@{" 257 " link IML-257} MSG- 257 Subject: Re: Lha Archives Click-->@{" 258 " link IML-258} MSG- 258 Subject: Swirl Click-->@{" 259 " link IML-259} MSG- 259 Subject: Which PCs work Click-->@{" 260 " link IML-260} MSG- 260 Subject: Re: Memory problem? Click-->@{" 261 " link IML-261} MSG- 261 Subject: Re: Memory problem? Click-->@{" 262 " link IML-262} MSG- 262 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 263 " link IML-263} MSG- 263 Subject: Re[2]: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 264 " link IML-264} MSG- 264 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 265 " link IML-265} MSG- 265 Subject: Trace scenes wanted Click-->@{" 266 " link IML-266} MSG- 266 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 267 " link IML-267} MSG- 267 Subject: Re: Swirl Click-->@{" 268 " link IML-268} MSG- 268 Subject: Mouse.SYS trouble Click-->@{" 269 " link IML-269} MSG- 269 Subject: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 270 " link IML-270} MSG- 270 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 271 " link IML-271} MSG- 271 Subject: Re: IMAGINE COOKBOOK Click-->@{" 272 " link IML-272} MSG- 272 Subject: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 273 " link IML-273} MSG- 273 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 274 " link IML-274} MSG- 274 Subject: Re: Forms Editor Tutorial (was: Imagine WWW site) Click-->@{" 275 " link IML-275} MSG- 275 Subject: RE: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 276 " link IML-276} MSG- 276 Subject: Swirl Click-->@{" 277 " link IML-277} MSG- 277 Subject: Re: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 278 " link IML-278} MSG- 278 Subject: IML Tidbits... Click-->@{" 279 " link IML-279} MSG- 279 Subject: Re: Attitudes Click-->@{" 280 " link IML-280} MSG- 280 Subject: Re: Memory problem? Click-->@{" 281 " link IML-281} MSG- 281 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits (was Re: Candle) Click-->@{" 282 " link IML-282} MSG- 282 Subject: Exelent gifs Click-->@{" 283 " link IML-283} MSG- 283 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits... Click-->@{" 284 " link IML-284} MSG- 284 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 285 " link IML-285} MSG- 285 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits (was Re: Candle) Click-->@{" 286 " link IML-286} MSG- 286 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 287 " link IML-287} MSG- 287 Subject: Itty, bitty tidbit ... Click-->@{" 288 " link IML-288} MSG- 288 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 289 " link IML-289} MSG- 289 Subject: Re: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... Click-->@{" 290 " link IML-290} MSG- 290 Subject: Re: Mouse.SYS trouble Click-->@{" 291 " link IML-291} MSG- 291 Subject: Re: Attitudes Click-->@{" 292 " link IML-292} MSG- 292 Subject: Dust? Click-->@{" 293 " link IML-293} MSG- 293 Subject: Re: exelent gifs Click-->@{" 294 " link IML-294} MSG- 294 Subject: Re: Re[2]: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 295 " link IML-295} MSG- 295 Subject: Bones help.... Click-->@{" 296 " link IML-296} MSG- 296 Subject: Re: Mouse.SYS trouble (+start-up files) Click-->@{" 297 " link IML-297} MSG- 297 Subject: GVP&Imagine Click-->@{" 298 " link IML-298} MSG- 298 Subject: Re: Lha Archives Click-->@{" 299 " link IML-299} MSG- 299 Subject: Thanks Click-->@{" 300 " link IML-300} MSG- 300 Subject: Tunnel trouble Click-->@{" 301 " link IML-301} MSG- 301 Subject: IML Tidbits (done!). Click-->@{" 302 " link IML-302} MSG- 302 Subject: Re: Mouse.SYS trouble Click-->@{" 303 " link IML-303} MSG- 303 Subject: Running Imagine from Remote Click-->@{" 304 " link IML-304} MSG- 304 Subject: Re: GVP&Imagine Click-->@{" 305 " link IML-305} MSG- 305 Subject: IML Tidbits (cont.) Click-->@{" 306 " link IML-306} MSG- 306 Subject: ATI Ultra Pro Click-->@{" 307 " link IML-307} MSG- 307 Subject: IML-TIDBITS ! Click-->@{" 308 " link IML-308} MSG- 308 Subject: POVRay competition Click-->@{" 309 " link IML-309} MSG- 309 Subject: Re: Tunnel trouble Click-->@{" 310 " link IML-310} MSG- 310 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits (done!). Click-->@{" 311 " link IML-311} MSG- 311 Subject: They call me ray BBS! Click-->@{" 312 " link IML-312} MSG- 312 Subject: Re: IML-TIDBITS ! (Ditto) Click-->@{" 313 " link IML-313} MSG- 313 Subject: Imagine/PCI Problems Click-->@{" 314 " link IML-314} MSG- 314 Subject: Re: Upgrades?? Click-->@{" 315 " link IML-315} MSG- 315 Subject: Tunnel trouble Click-->@{" 316 " link IML-316} MSG- 316 Subject: Imagine Tips Click-->@{" 317 " link IML-317} MSG- 317 Subject: Re: good turbulent gas effect?? Click-->@{" 318 " link IML-318} MSG- 318 Subject: Candle Click-->@{" 319 " link IML-319} MSG- 319 Subject: I/O Click-->@{" 320 " link IML-320} MSG- 320 Subject: Re: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 321 " link IML-321} MSG- 321 Subject: PC Shareware?? other textures? Click-->@{" 322 " link IML-322} MSG- 322 Subject: Textures Click-->@{" 323 " link IML-323} MSG- 323 Subject: Swirl Click-->@{" 324 " link IML-324} MSG- 324 Subject: Essence Textures V 1.0 Click-->@{" 325 " link IML-325} MSG- 325 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 326 " link IML-326} MSG- 326 Subject: Re: Essence Textures V 1.0 Click-->@{" 327 " link IML-327} MSG- 327 Subject: Re: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 328 " link IML-328} MSG- 328 Subject: ATI Ultra Pro - Folowup Click-->@{" 329 " link IML-329} MSG- 329 Subject: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 330 " link IML-330} MSG- 330 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 331 " link IML-331} MSG- 331 Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro - Folowup Click-->@{" 332 " link IML-332} MSG- 332 Subject: Re: Tunnel trouble Click-->@{" 333 " link IML-333} MSG- 333 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 334 " link IML-334} MSG- 334 Subject: V3.1 imagine Click-->@{" 335 " link IML-335} MSG- 335 Subject: Re: Re: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 336 " link IML-336} MSG- 336 Subject: Re: I/O Click-->@{" 337 " link IML-337} MSG- 337 Subject: Sliding smoothly in a tunnel:) Click-->@{" 338 " link IML-338} MSG- 338 Subject: THEY CALL ME RAY BBS! Click-->@{" 339 " link IML-339} MSG- 339 Subject: Lens Flare Click-->@{" 340 " link IML-340} MSG- 340 Subject: Essence and Garbles Click-->@{" 341 " link IML-341} MSG- 341 Subject: Re: V3.1 imagine Click-->@{" 342 " link IML-342} MSG- 342 Subject: RE: IMAGINE COOKBOOK Click-->@{" 343 " link IML-343} MSG- 343 Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro - Followup Click-->@{" 344 " link IML-344} MSG- 344 Subject: IML-Tidbits. Click-->@{" 345 " link IML-345} MSG- 345 Subject: Re: IML-Tidbits. Click-->@{" 346 " link IML-346} MSG- 346 Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro - Followup Click-->@{" 347 " link IML-347} MSG- 347 Subject: Brush wraps Click-->@{" 348 " link IML-348} MSG- 348 Subject: V3.1 Imagine - no cpu hog Click-->@{" 349 " link IML-349} MSG- 349 Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro - Followup Click-->@{" 350 " link IML-350} MSG- 350 Subject: RE: LENS FLARE Click-->@{" 351 " link IML-351} MSG- 351 Subject: Thanks Click-->@{" 352 " link IML-352} MSG- 352 Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro - Followup Click-->@{" 353 " link IML-353} MSG- 353 Subject: Banging into tunnel walls Click-->@{" 354 " link IML-354} MSG- 354 Subject: Imagine V.3.1 Click-->@{" 355 " link IML-355} MSG- 355 Subject: Re: Brush wraps Click-->@{" 356 " link IML-356} MSG- 356 Subject: Re: Imagine V.3.1 Click-->@{" 357 " link IML-357} MSG- 357 Subject: Re:Which PC's work. Click-->@{" 358 " link IML-358} MSG- 358 Subject: Re: Flare Click-->@{" 359 " link IML-359} MSG- 359 Subject: Candle Click-->@{" 360 " link IML-360} MSG- 360 Subject: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 361 " link IML-361} MSG- 361 Subject: Re: PC Shareware?? other textures? Click-->@{" 362 " link IML-362} MSG- 362 Subject: Brush wraps Click-->@{" 363 " link IML-363} MSG- 363 Subject: Filter Bug? Click-->@{" 364 " link IML-364} MSG- 364 Subject: Re: Being on Imagine Mail List Click-->@{" 365 " link IML-365} MSG- 365 Subject: ISL QUESTIONS. Click-->@{" 366 " link IML-366} MSG- 366 Subject: Filter Bug? Click-->@{" 367 " link IML-367} MSG- 367 Subject: Re: Filter Bug? Click-->@{" 368 " link IML-368} MSG- 368 Subject: Multiple boned objects in group of objects? Click-->@{" 369 " link IML-369} MSG- 369 Subject: Re: Multiple boned objects in group of objects? Click-->@{" 370 " link IML-370} MSG- 370 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 371 " link IML-371} MSG- 371 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 372 " link IML-372} MSG- 372 Subject: Registering an already reg copy of Imagine. Click-->@{" 373 " link IML-373} MSG- 373 Subject: Re: Imagine V.3.1 Click-->@{" 374 " link IML-374} MSG- 374 Subject: Boned object problem solved Click-->@{" 375 " link IML-375} MSG- 375 Subject: Re: Registering an already reg copy of Imagine. Click-->@{" 376 " link IML-376} MSG- 376 Subject: Bones Click-->@{" 377 " link IML-377} MSG- 377 Subject: Dxf Click-->@{" 378 " link IML-378} MSG- 378 Subject: Re: boned object problem solved Click-->@{" 379 " link IML-379} MSG- 379 Subject: Re: Imagine V.3.1 Click-->@{" 380 " link IML-380} MSG- 380 Subject: Re: boned object problem solved Click-->@{" 381 " link IML-381} MSG- 381 Subject: XSpecs stuff held up due to security issues Click-->@{" 382 " link IML-382} MSG- 382 Subject: RE: Bones Click-->@{" 383 " link IML-383} MSG- 383 Subject: Moving the camera in the Stage Editor Click-->@{" 384 " link IML-384} MSG- 384 Subject: Re: dxf Click-->@{" 385 " link IML-385} MSG- 385 Subject: RE: Bones Click-->@{" 386 " link IML-386} MSG- 386 Subject: Good water Click-->@{" 387 " link IML-387} MSG- 387 Subject: Re: Bones Click-->@{" 388 " link IML-388} MSG- 388 Subject: Sorry I'm boneheaded but... Click-->@{" 389 " link IML-389} MSG- 389 Subject: RE: Bones Click-->@{" 390 " link IML-390} MSG- 390 Subject: Quicktime, MPEG, .AVI creators? Click-->@{" 391 " link IML-391} MSG- 391 Subject: Re: sorry I'm boneheaded but... Click-->@{" 392 " link IML-392} MSG- 392 Subject: Re: Bones Click-->@{" 393 " link IML-393} MSG- 393 Subject: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 394 " link IML-394} MSG- 394 Subject: Re: Quicktime, MPEG, .AVI creators? Click-->@{" 395 " link IML-395} MSG- 395 Subject: Re: Quicktime, MPEG, .AVI creators? Click-->@{" 396 " link IML-396} MSG- 396 Subject: Frames/speed Click-->@{" 397 " link IML-397} MSG- 397 Subject: Re: Imagine Wishlist Click-->@{" 398 " link IML-398} MSG- 398 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 399 " link IML-399} MSG- 399 Subject: Re: Bones Click-->@{" 400 " link IML-400} MSG- 400 Subject: Imagine 3.2 Click-->@{" 401 " link IML-401} MSG- 401 Subject: Dare To... apply attributes ? Click-->@{" 402 " link IML-402} MSG- 402 Subject: Re: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 403 " link IML-403} MSG- 403 Subject: Thank You Click-->@{" 404 " link IML-404} MSG- 404 Subject: Imagine 3.2 Click-->@{" 405 " link IML-405} MSG- 405 Subject: Re: good water Click-->@{" 406 " link IML-406} MSG- 406 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 407 " link IML-407} MSG- 407 Subject: Trouble applying brush maps Click-->@{" 408 " link IML-408} MSG- 408 Subject: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 409 " link IML-409} MSG- 409 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 410 " link IML-410} MSG- 410 Subject: Re: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 411 " link IML-411} MSG- 411 Subject: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 412 " link IML-412} MSG- 412 Subject: Finnish animators? Click-->@{" 413 " link IML-413} MSG- 413 Subject: Re: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 414 " link IML-414} MSG- 414 Subject: Re: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 415 " link IML-415} MSG- 415 Subject: Re: Trouble applying brush maps Click-->@{" 416 " link IML-416} MSG- 416 Subject: Re: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 417 " link IML-417} MSG- 417 Subject: Virtaul Memory with ImaginePC Click-->@{" 418 " link IML-418} MSG- 418 Subject: Re: Trouble applying brush maps Click-->@{" 419 " link IML-419} MSG- 419 Subject: Imagine 3.x Click-->@{" 420 " link IML-420} MSG- 420 Subject: Re: Virtaul Memory with ImaginePC Click-->@{" 421 " link IML-421} MSG- 421 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.x Click-->@{" 422 " link IML-422} MSG- 422 Subject: Re: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 423 " link IML-423} MSG- 423 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.x Click-->@{" 424 " link IML-424} MSG- 424 Subject: Pool-balls Click-->@{" 425 " link IML-425} MSG- 425 Subject: Re: Filter Bug? Click-->@{" 426 " link IML-426} MSG- 426 Subject: RE: Pool-balls Click-->@{" 427 " link IML-427} MSG- 427 Subject: Object attributes (Imagine). Click-->@{" 428 " link IML-428} MSG- 428 Subject: Re: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 429 " link IML-429} MSG- 429 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 430 " link IML-430} MSG- 430 Subject: 3.2 is here! Click-->@{" 431 " link IML-431} MSG- 431 Subject: Trouble w/final anim rendering Click-->@{" 432 " link IML-432} MSG- 432 Subject: Trouble applying brush maps Click-->@{" 433 " link IML-433} MSG- 433 Subject: Re: Pool-balls Click-->@{" 434 " link IML-434} MSG- 434 Subject: Re: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 435 " link IML-435} MSG- 435 Subject: Re: Imagine TIF's Click-->@{" 436 " link IML-436} MSG- 436 Subject: Re[1]: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 437 " link IML-437} MSG- 437 Subject: Error: Loop in obj. Depend? Click-->@{" 438 " link IML-438} MSG- 438 Subject: Re: trouble w/final anim rendering Click-->@{" 439 " link IML-439} MSG- 439 Subject: Re: 3.2 is here! Click-->@{" 440 " link IML-440} MSG- 440 Subject: Re: trouble w/final anim rendering Click-->@{" 441 " link IML-441} MSG- 441 Subject: Final anim rend solution Click-->@{" 442 " link IML-442} MSG- 442 Subject: Underwater Click-->@{" 443 " link IML-443} MSG- 443 Subject: Re: trouble w/final anim rendering Click-->@{" 444 " link IML-444} MSG- 444 Subject: Underwater Click-->@{" 445 " link IML-445} MSG- 445 Subject: Re: Underwater Click-->@{" 446 " link IML-446} MSG- 446 Subject: Loop in object depend. Click-->@{" 447 " link IML-447} MSG- 447 Subject: Windows NT Click-->@{" 448 " link IML-448} MSG- 448 Subject: Imagine Wishlist Click-->@{" 449 " link IML-449} MSG- 449 Subject: Re: 3.2 is here! Click-->@{" 450 " link IML-450} MSG- 450 Subject: Re: Loop:in obj... Click-->@{" 451 " link IML-451} MSG- 451 Subject: Re: 3.2 is here! Click-->@{" 452 " link IML-452} MSG- 452 Subject: Re: Re[1]: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 453 " link IML-453} MSG- 453 Subject: FTP uploads Click-->@{" 454 " link IML-454} MSG- 454 Subject: Realistic static Click-->@{" 455 " link IML-455} MSG- 455 Subject: Realistic static Click-->@{" 456 " link IML-456} MSG- 456 Subject: Info from CI$. Click-->@{" 457 " link IML-457} MSG- 457 Subject: Re: realistic static Click-->@{" 458 " link IML-458} MSG- 458 Subject: Re: FTP uploads Click-->@{" 459 " link IML-459} MSG- 459 Subject: Caustic lite texture Click-->@{" 460 " link IML-460} MSG- 460 Subject: Chinalake/Avalon Click-->@{" 461 " link IML-461} MSG- 461 Subject: Imagine crashes Click-->@{" 462 " link IML-462} MSG- 462 Subject: Sway @endnode contents @node Index "IMAGINE MAILING LIST V59- CONTENTS" @toc contents Click-->@{" 1 " link IML-15} MSG- 15 ------=> Sorry NO Subject! Click-->@{" 2 " link IML-14} MSG- 14 ------=> Sorry NO Subject! Click-->@{" 3 " link IML-105} MSG- 105 ------=> Sorry NO Subject! Click-->@{" 4 " link IML-20} MSG- 20 ------=> Sorry NO Subject! Click-->@{" 5 " link IML-4} MSG- 4 ------=> Sorry NO Subject! Click-->@{" 6 " link IML-430} MSG- 430 Subject: 3.2 is here! Click-->@{" 7 " link IML-449} MSG- 449 Subject: Re: 3.2 is here! Click-->@{" 8 " link IML-439} MSG- 439 Subject: Re: 3.2 is here! Click-->@{" 9 " link IML-451} MSG- 451 Subject: Re: 3.2 is here! Click-->@{" 10 " link IML-201} MSG- 201 Subject: 3D Artist Click-->@{" 11 " link IML-116} MSG- 116 Subject: 3D Artist magazine Click-->@{" 12 " link IML-136} MSG- 136 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Click-->@{" 13 " link IML-143} MSG- 143 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Click-->@{" 14 " link IML-120} MSG- 120 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Click-->@{" 15 " link IML-122} MSG- 122 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Click-->@{" 16 " link IML-101} MSG- 101 Subject: 3d job... Click-->@{" 17 " link IML-2} MSG- 2 Subject: Re: 3d Stereograms (Fwd) Click-->@{" 18 " link IML-113} MSG- 113 Subject: 8-color Imagine Click-->@{" 19 " link IML-145} MSG- 145 Subject: Re: 8-color Imagine Click-->@{" 20 " link IML-30} MSG- 30 Subject: A2000 '40 boards Click-->@{" 21 " link IML-155} MSG- 155 Subject: Add44k Click-->@{" 22 " link IML-91} MSG- 91 Subject: Address needed Click-->@{" 23 " link IML-360} MSG- 360 Subject: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 24 " link IML-329} MSG- 329 Subject: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 25 " link IML-272} MSG- 272 Subject: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 26 " link IML-269} MSG- 269 Subject: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 27 " link IML-246} MSG- 246 Subject: Amiga->PC textures? Click-->@{" 28 " link IML-98} MSG- 98 Subject: Aminet Click-->@{" 29 " link IML-58} MSG- 58 Subject: Archives... Click-->@{" 30 " link IML-306} MSG- 306 Subject: ATI Ultra Pro Click-->@{" 31 " link IML-343} MSG- 343 Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro - Followup Click-->@{" 32 " link IML-346} MSG- 346 Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro - Followup Click-->@{" 33 " link IML-349} MSG- 349 Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro - Followup Click-->@{" 34 " link IML-352} MSG- 352 Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro - Followup Click-->@{" 35 " link IML-328} MSG- 328 Subject: ATI Ultra Pro - Folowup Click-->@{" 36 " link IML-331} MSG- 331 Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro - Folowup Click-->@{" 37 " link IML-279} MSG- 279 Subject: Re: Attitudes Click-->@{" 38 " link IML-291} MSG- 291 Subject: Re: Attitudes Click-->@{" 39 " link IML-353} MSG- 353 Subject: Banging into tunnel walls Click-->@{" 40 " link IML-364} MSG- 364 Subject: Re: Being on Imagine Mail List Click-->@{" 41 " link IML-374} MSG- 374 Subject: Boned object problem solved Click-->@{" 42 " link IML-380} MSG- 380 Subject: Re: Boned object problem solved Click-->@{" 43 " link IML-378} MSG- 378 Subject: Re: Boned object problem solved Click-->@{" 44 " link IML-376} MSG- 376 Subject: Bones Click-->@{" 45 " link IML-295} MSG- 295 Subject: Bones help.... Click-->@{" 46 " link IML-392} MSG- 392 Subject: Re: Bones Click-->@{" 47 " link IML-385} MSG- 385 Subject: RE: Bones Click-->@{" 48 " link IML-387} MSG- 387 Subject: Re: Bones Click-->@{" 49 " link IML-389} MSG- 389 Subject: RE: Bones Click-->@{" 50 " link IML-382} MSG- 382 Subject: RE: Bones Click-->@{" 51 " link IML-399} MSG- 399 Subject: Re: Bones Click-->@{" 52 " link IML-285} MSG- 285 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits (was Re: Candle) Click-->@{" 53 " link IML-281} MSG- 281 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits (was Re: Candle) Click-->@{" 54 " link IML-197} MSG- 197 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 55 " link IML-224} MSG- 224 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 56 " link IML-242} MSG- 242 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 57 " link IML-211} MSG- 211 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 58 " link IML-210} MSG- 210 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 59 " link IML-245} MSG- 245 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 60 " link IML-198} MSG- 198 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 61 " link IML-247} MSG- 247 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 62 " link IML-79} MSG- 79 Subject: Bouncy, bouncy, bouncy... Click-->@{" 63 " link IML-347} MSG- 347 Subject: Brush wraps Click-->@{" 64 " link IML-362} MSG- 362 Subject: Brush wraps Click-->@{" 65 " link IML-355} MSG- 355 Subject: Re: Brush wraps Click-->@{" 66 " link IML-154} MSG- 154 Subject: Candle Click-->@{" 67 " link IML-239} MSG- 239 Subject: Candle Click-->@{" 68 " link IML-318} MSG- 318 Subject: Candle Click-->@{" 69 " link IML-359} MSG- 359 Subject: Candle Click-->@{" 70 " link IML-179} MSG- 179 Subject: Candle Click-->@{" 71 " link IML-187} MSG- 187 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 72 " link IML-190} MSG- 190 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 73 " link IML-204} MSG- 204 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 74 " link IML-189} MSG- 189 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 75 " link IML-194} MSG- 194 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 76 " link IML-186} MSG- 186 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 77 " link IML-216} MSG- 216 Subject: Re: Candle Click-->@{" 78 " link IML-459} MSG- 459 Subject: Caustic lite texture Click-->@{" 79 " link IML-103} MSG- 103 Subject: Re: Caustic Click-->@{" 80 " link IML-460} MSG- 460 Subject: Chinalake/Avalon Click-->@{" 81 " link IML-13} MSG- 13 Subject: Re: Clouds (again!) Click-->@{" 82 " link IML-214} MSG- 214 Subject: Computer objects Click-->@{" 83 " link IML-55} MSG- 55 Subject: CONFIG.SYS Click-->@{" 84 " link IML-22} MSG- 22 Subject: Creating a good smoke effect... Click-->@{" 85 " link IML-38} MSG- 38 Subject: Creating a good smoke effect... (fwd) Click-->@{" 86 " link IML-102} MSG- 102 Subject: Re: Creating a good smoke effect... Click-->@{" 87 " link IML-67} MSG- 67 Subject: Re: Creating a good smoke effect... Click-->@{" 88 " link IML-72} MSG- 72 Subject: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 89 " link IML-75} MSG- 75 Subject: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 90 " link IML-93} MSG- 93 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 91 " link IML-118} MSG- 118 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 92 " link IML-82} MSG- 82 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 93 " link IML-97} MSG- 97 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 94 " link IML-119} MSG- 119 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Click-->@{" 95 " link IML-69} MSG- 69 Subject: Cuttings?? Click-->@{" 96 " link IML-401} MSG- 401 Subject: Dare To... apply attributes ? Click-->@{" 97 " link IML-27} MSG- 27 Subject: Digimax and other digitizer Click-->@{" 98 " link IML-152} MSG- 152 Subject: Disco Ball Click-->@{" 99 " link IML-130} MSG- 130 Subject: Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 100 " link IML-138} MSG- 138 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 101 " link IML-147} MSG- 147 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 102 " link IML-137} MSG- 137 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 103 " link IML-135} MSG- 135 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 104 " link IML-37} MSG- 37 Subject: Dust 1.43 Click-->@{" 105 " link IML-292} MSG- 292 Subject: Dust? Click-->@{" 106 " link IML-377} MSG- 377 Subject: Dxf Click-->@{" 107 " link IML-384} MSG- 384 Subject: Re: Dxf Click-->@{" 108 " link IML-437} MSG- 437 Subject: Error: Loop in obj. Depend? Click-->@{" 109 " link IML-340} MSG- 340 Subject: Essence and Garbles Click-->@{" 110 " link IML-324} MSG- 324 Subject: Essence Textures V 1.0 Click-->@{" 111 " link IML-326} MSG- 326 Subject: Re: Essence Textures V 1.0 Click-->@{" 112 " link IML-282} MSG- 282 Subject: Exelent gifs Click-->@{" 113 " link IML-293} MSG- 293 Subject: Re: Exelent gifs Click-->@{" 114 " link IML-366} MSG- 366 Subject: Filter Bug? Click-->@{" 115 " link IML-363} MSG- 363 Subject: Filter Bug? Click-->@{" 116 " link IML-367} MSG- 367 Subject: Re: Filter Bug? Click-->@{" 117 " link IML-425} MSG- 425 Subject: Re: Filter Bug? Click-->@{" 118 " link IML-441} MSG- 441 Subject: Final anim rend solution Click-->@{" 119 " link IML-412} MSG- 412 Subject: Finnish animators? Click-->@{" 120 " link IML-358} MSG- 358 Subject: Re: Flare Click-->@{" 121 " link IML-83} MSG- 83 Subject: Fog objects and global fog Click-->@{" 122 " link IML-129} MSG- 129 Subject: Re: Fog objects and global fog Click-->@{" 123 " link IML-252} MSG- 252 Subject: Forms Editor Tutorial (was: Imagine WWW site) Click-->@{" 124 " link IML-274} MSG- 274 Subject: Re: Forms Editor Tutorial (was: Imagine WWW site) Click-->@{" 125 " link IML-396} MSG- 396 Subject: Frames/speed Click-->@{" 126 " link IML-453} MSG- 453 Subject: FTP uploads Click-->@{" 127 " link IML-458} MSG- 458 Subject: Re: FTP uploads Click-->@{" 128 " link IML-100} MSG- 100 Subject: Function Key Favorite Click-->@{" 129 " link IML-139} MSG- 139 Subject: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 130 " link IML-144} MSG- 144 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 131 " link IML-176} MSG- 176 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 132 " link IML-185} MSG- 185 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 133 " link IML-151} MSG- 151 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 134 " link IML-148} MSG- 148 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 135 " link IML-150} MSG- 150 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Click-->@{" 136 " link IML-128} MSG- 128 Subject: Re: Function Key Favorite Click-->@{" 137 " link IML-196} MSG- 196 Subject: Good turbulent gas effect?? Click-->@{" 138 " link IML-317} MSG- 317 Subject: Re: Good turbulent gas effect?? Click-->@{" 139 " link IML-386} MSG- 386 Subject: Good water Click-->@{" 140 " link IML-405} MSG- 405 Subject: Re: Good water Click-->@{" 141 " link IML-141} MSG- 141 Subject: Graphics Click-->@{" 142 " link IML-60} MSG- 60 Subject: Grow f/x problem Click-->@{" 143 " link IML-297} MSG- 297 Subject: GVP&Imagine Click-->@{" 144 " link IML-304} MSG- 304 Subject: Re: GVP&Imagine Click-->@{" 145 " link IML-1} MSG- 1 Subject: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Click-->@{" 146 " link IML-90} MSG- 90 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Click-->@{" 147 " link IML-16} MSG- 16 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Click-->@{" 148 " link IML-6} MSG- 6 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Click-->@{" 149 " link IML-95} MSG- 95 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Click-->@{" 150 " link IML-19} MSG- 19 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Ima Click-->@{" 151 " link IML-171} MSG- 171 Subject: Help needed running Imagine on ATI Ultra Pro Click-->@{" 152 " link IML-181} MSG- 181 Subject: Re: Help needed running Imagine on ATI Ultra Pro Click-->@{" 153 " link IML-220} MSG- 220 Subject: How to books (was Re: Candle Click-->@{" 154 " link IML-172} MSG- 172 Subject: How to make a spaceship shield using Essence textures Click-->@{" 155 " link IML-87} MSG- 87 Subject: I'm not receiving the IML Click-->@{" 156 " link IML-250} MSG- 250 Subject: I/O Click-->@{" 157 " link IML-319} MSG- 319 Subject: I/O Click-->@{" 158 " link IML-241} MSG- 241 Subject: I/O Click-->@{" 159 " link IML-336} MSG- 336 Subject: Re: I/O Click-->@{" 160 " link IML-35} MSG- 35 Subject: Ian Smiths Starfield util Click-->@{" 161 " link IML-77} MSG- 77 Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util Click-->@{" 162 " link IML-46} MSG- 46 Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util Click-->@{" 163 " link IML-73} MSG- 73 Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util Click-->@{" 164 " link IML-227} MSG- 227 Subject: Ideas on how to make chaotic cigarette smoke Click-->@{" 165 " link IML-18} MSG- 18 Subject: Re: Im2.0 PC Click-->@{" 166 " link IML-159} MSG- 159 Subject: Imagine 3.1 states & textures Click-->@{" 167 " link IML-168} MSG- 168 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.1 states & textures Click-->@{" 168 " link IML-177} MSG- 177 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.1 states & textures Click-->@{" 169 " link IML-404} MSG- 404 Subject: Imagine 3.2 Click-->@{" 170 " link IML-400} MSG- 400 Subject: Imagine 3.2 Click-->@{" 171 " link IML-191} MSG- 191 Subject: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 172 " link IML-231} MSG- 231 Subject: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 173 " link IML-156} MSG- 156 Subject: Imagine 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 174 " link IML-174} MSG- 174 Subject: Imagine 3.2 ? (fwd) Click-->@{" 175 " link IML-162} MSG- 162 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 176 " link IML-160} MSG- 160 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 177 " link IML-275} MSG- 275 Subject: RE: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 178 " link IML-232} MSG- 232 Subject: RE: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 179 " link IML-205} MSG- 205 Subject: Re: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Click-->@{" 180 " link IML-419} MSG- 419 Subject: Imagine 3.x Click-->@{" 181 " link IML-423} MSG- 423 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.x Click-->@{" 182 " link IML-421} MSG- 421 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.x Click-->@{" 183 " link IML-9} MSG- 9 Subject: Re: Imagine and GVP '040 Click-->@{" 184 " link IML-115} MSG- 115 Subject: Imagine and lightwave Click-->@{" 185 " link IML-223} MSG- 223 Subject: Imagine Cookbook Click-->@{" 186 " link IML-251} MSG- 251 Subject: RE: IMAGINE COOKBOOK Click-->@{" 187 " link IML-342} MSG- 342 Subject: RE: IMAGINE COOKBOOK Click-->@{" 188 " link IML-271} MSG- 271 Subject: Re: IMAGINE COOKBOOK Click-->@{" 189 " link IML-461} MSG- 461 Subject: Imagine crashes Click-->@{" 190 " link IML-225} MSG- 225 Subject: Imagine Improvements was IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 191 " link IML-31} MSG- 31 Subject: IMAGINE L/T FINAL QUESTIO Click-->@{" 192 " link IML-24} MSG- 24 Subject: Imagine L/T Final question... Click-->@{" 193 " link IML-25} MSG- 25 Subject: Imagine L/T: Thanx for help! Click-->@{" 194 " link IML-7} MSG- 7 Subject: Re: Imagine L/T Click-->@{" 195 " link IML-17} MSG- 17 Subject: Imagine Launched with ToolManager Click-->@{" 196 " link IML-229} MSG- 229 Subject: Imagine Tidbit Booklet Click-->@{" 197 " link IML-234} MSG- 234 Subject: Re: Imagine Tidbit Booklet Click-->@{" 198 " link IML-240} MSG- 240 Subject: Re: Imagine Tidbit Booklet Click-->@{" 199 " link IML-207} MSG- 207 Subject: Imagine tidbits Click-->@{" 200 " link IML-89} MSG- 89 Subject: Imagine TIF's Click-->@{" 201 " link IML-435} MSG- 435 Subject: Re: Imagine TIF's Click-->@{" 202 " link IML-94} MSG- 94 Subject: Re: Imagine TIF's Click-->@{" 203 " link IML-316} MSG- 316 Subject: Imagine Tips Click-->@{" 204 " link IML-8} MSG- 8 Subject: RE: Imagine Under MS-DOS Click-->@{" 205 " link IML-354} MSG- 354 Subject: Imagine V.3.1 Click-->@{" 206 " link IML-373} MSG- 373 Subject: Re: Imagine V.3.1 Click-->@{" 207 " link IML-379} MSG- 379 Subject: Re: Imagine V.3.1 Click-->@{" 208 " link IML-356} MSG- 356 Subject: Re: Imagine V.3.1 Click-->@{" 209 " link IML-393} MSG- 393 Subject: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 210 " link IML-408} MSG- 408 Subject: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 211 " link IML-448} MSG- 448 Subject: Imagine Wishlist Click-->@{" 212 " link IML-402} MSG- 402 Subject: Re: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 213 " link IML-422} MSG- 422 Subject: Re: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 214 " link IML-428} MSG- 428 Subject: Re: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 215 " link IML-434} MSG- 434 Subject: Re: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 216 " link IML-397} MSG- 397 Subject: Re: Imagine Wishlist Click-->@{" 217 " link IML-410} MSG- 410 Subject: Re: Imagine wishlist Click-->@{" 218 " link IML-236} MSG- 236 Subject: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 219 " link IML-409} MSG- 409 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 220 " link IML-286} MSG- 286 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 221 " link IML-333} MSG- 333 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 222 " link IML-249} MSG- 249 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 223 " link IML-429} MSG- 429 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 224 " link IML-371} MSG- 371 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 225 " link IML-370} MSG- 370 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 226 " link IML-330} MSG- 330 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 227 " link IML-270} MSG- 270 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 228 " link IML-398} MSG- 398 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 229 " link IML-273} MSG- 273 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 230 " link IML-266} MSG- 266 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 231 " link IML-406} MSG- 406 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 232 " link IML-325} MSG- 325 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Click-->@{" 233 " link IML-47} MSG- 47 Subject: IMAGINE, DIGIMAX & PC Interrupts Click-->@{" 234 " link IML-313} MSG- 313 Subject: Imagine/PCI Problems Click-->@{" 235 " link IML-51} MSG- 51 Subject: Imagine2.0 pc book Click-->@{" 236 " link IML-3} MSG- 3 Subject: Re: Imagine Click-->@{" 237 " link IML-305} MSG- 305 Subject: IML Tidbits (cont.) Click-->@{" 238 " link IML-301} MSG- 301 Subject: IML Tidbits (done!). Click-->@{" 239 " link IML-310} MSG- 310 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits (done!). Click-->@{" 240 " link IML-193} MSG- 193 Subject: Re: IML tidbits (was Candle) Click-->@{" 241 " link IML-278} MSG- 278 Subject: IML Tidbits... Click-->@{" 242 " link IML-283} MSG- 283 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits... Click-->@{" 243 " link IML-212} MSG- 212 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 244 " link IML-230} MSG- 230 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 245 " link IML-284} MSG- 284 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 246 " link IML-262} MSG- 262 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 247 " link IML-222} MSG- 222 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 248 " link IML-288} MSG- 288 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 249 " link IML-218} MSG- 218 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 250 " link IML-217} MSG- 217 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 251 " link IML-264} MSG- 264 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 252 " link IML-243} MSG- 243 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 253 " link IML-307} MSG- 307 Subject: IML-TIDBITS ! Click-->@{" 254 " link IML-312} MSG- 312 Subject: Re: IML-TIDBITS ! (Ditto) Click-->@{" 255 " link IML-344} MSG- 344 Subject: IML-Tidbits. Click-->@{" 256 " link IML-345} MSG- 345 Subject: Re: IML-Tidbits. Click-->@{" 257 " link IML-456} MSG- 456 Subject: Info from CI$. Click-->@{" 258 " link IML-365} MSG- 365 Subject: ISL QUESTIONS. Click-->@{" 259 " link IML-109} MSG- 109 Subject: ISL(??) Click-->@{" 260 " link IML-287} MSG- 287 Subject: Itty, bitty tidbit ... Click-->@{" 261 " link IML-244} MSG- 244 Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpec... Click-->@{" 262 " link IML-237} MSG- 237 Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpec... Click-->@{" 263 " link IML-164} MSG- 164 Subject: I`ve got lots of PD XSpecs software for any who want it. Click-->@{" 264 " link IML-169} MSG- 169 Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpecs software for any who want it. Click-->@{" 265 " link IML-339} MSG- 339 Subject: Lens Flare Click-->@{" 266 " link IML-350} MSG- 350 Subject: RE: LENS FLARE Click-->@{" 267 " link IML-110} MSG- 110 Subject: Re: Lha again! Click-->@{" 268 " link IML-107} MSG- 107 Subject: Re: Lha again! Click-->@{" 269 " link IML-126} MSG- 126 Subject: Re: Lha again! Click-->@{" 270 " link IML-133} MSG- 133 Subject: Re: Lha again! Click-->@{" 271 " link IML-131} MSG- 131 Subject: RE: LHA AGAIN! Click-->@{" 272 " link IML-238} MSG- 238 Subject: Re: Lha Archives Click-->@{" 273 " link IML-257} MSG- 257 Subject: Re: Lha Archives Click-->@{" 274 " link IML-298} MSG- 298 Subject: Re: Lha Archives Click-->@{" 275 " link IML-235} MSG- 235 Subject: Re: Lha Archives Click-->@{" 276 " link IML-36} MSG- 36 Subject: LHA objects again!!! Click-->@{" 277 " link IML-202} MSG- 202 Subject: Locomotive objects Click-->@{" 278 " link IML-255} MSG- 255 Subject: Re: Locomotive objects Click-->@{" 279 " link IML-446} MSG- 446 Subject: Loop in object depend. Click-->@{" 280 " link IML-450} MSG- 450 Subject: Re: Loop:in obj... Click-->@{" 281 " link IML-183} MSG- 183 Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine(brushmap transparency "bug") Click-->@{" 282 " link IML-209} MSG- 209 Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine(brushmap transparency "bug") Click-->@{" 283 " link IML-206} MSG- 206 Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine Click-->@{" 284 " link IML-161} MSG- 161 Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine Click-->@{" 285 " link IML-188} MSG- 188 Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine Click-->@{" 286 " link IML-165} MSG- 165 Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine Click-->@{" 287 " link IML-140} MSG- 140 Subject: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 288 " link IML-184} MSG- 184 Subject: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 289 " link IML-70} MSG- 70 Subject: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 290 " link IML-76} MSG- 76 Subject: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 291 " link IML-85} MSG- 85 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 292 " link IML-92} MSG- 92 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 293 " link IML-178} MSG- 178 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 294 " link IML-123} MSG- 123 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 295 " link IML-121} MSG- 121 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 296 " link IML-233} MSG- 233 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 297 " link IML-125} MSG- 125 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 298 " link IML-108} MSG- 108 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 299 " link IML-192} MSG- 192 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 300 " link IML-146} MSG- 146 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 301 " link IML-203} MSG- 203 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 302 " link IML-149} MSG- 149 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 303 " link IML-213} MSG- 213 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 304 " link IML-208} MSG- 208 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 305 " link IML-106} MSG- 106 Subject: RE: LW VS. IMAGINE Click-->@{" 306 " link IML-175} MSG- 175 Subject: RE: LW VS. IMAGINE Click-->@{" 307 " link IML-104} MSG- 104 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 308 " link IML-99} MSG- 99 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 309 " link IML-96} MSG- 96 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 310 " link IML-127} MSG- 127 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Click-->@{" 311 " link IML-39} MSG- 39 Subject: Materials Click-->@{" 312 " link IML-33} MSG- 33 Subject: Materials Click-->@{" 313 " link IML-84} MSG- 84 Subject: Re: Materials Click-->@{" 314 " link IML-80} MSG- 80 Subject: Re: Materials Click-->@{" 315 " link IML-57} MSG- 57 Subject: Re: Materials Click-->@{" 316 " link IML-52} MSG- 52 Subject: Re: Materials Click-->@{" 317 " link IML-68} MSG- 68 Subject: Re: Materials Click-->@{" 318 " link IML-253} MSG- 253 Subject: Memory problem? Click-->@{" 319 " link IML-280} MSG- 280 Subject: Re: Memory problem? Click-->@{" 320 " link IML-260} MSG- 260 Subject: Re: Memory problem? Click-->@{" 321 " link IML-261} MSG- 261 Subject: Re: Memory problem? Click-->@{" 322 " link IML-254} MSG- 254 Subject: Re: Memory problem? Click-->@{" 323 " link IML-40} MSG- 40 Subject: Modeling strategy Click-->@{" 324 " link IML-71} MSG- 71 Subject: More Imagine Textures Click-->@{" 325 " link IML-114} MSG- 114 Subject: Re: More Imagine Textures Click-->@{" 326 " link IML-268} MSG- 268 Subject: Mouse.SYS trouble Click-->@{" 327 " link IML-296} MSG- 296 Subject: Re: Mouse.SYS trouble (+start-up files) Click-->@{" 328 " link IML-302} MSG- 302 Subject: Re: Mouse.SYS trouble Click-->@{" 329 " link IML-290} MSG- 290 Subject: Re: Mouse.SYS trouble Click-->@{" 330 " link IML-65} MSG- 65 Subject: Moving cloth Click-->@{" 331 " link IML-78} MSG- 78 Subject: Re: Moving cloth (fwd) Click-->@{" 332 " link IML-74} MSG- 74 Subject: Re: Moving cloth Click-->@{" 333 " link IML-383} MSG- 383 Subject: Moving the camera in the Stage Editor Click-->@{" 334 " link IML-368} MSG- 368 Subject: Multiple boned objects in group of objects? Click-->@{" 335 " link IML-369} MSG- 369 Subject: Re: Multiple boned objects in group of objects? Click-->@{" 336 " link IML-48} MSG- 48 Subject: Neuron image (short) Click-->@{" 337 " link IML-66} MSG- 66 Subject: Neuron image (short) Click-->@{" 338 " link IML-248} MSG- 248 Subject: Newsletter Click-->@{" 339 " link IML-427} MSG- 427 Subject: Object attributes (Imagine). Click-->@{" 340 " link IML-195} MSG- 195 Subject: Online Docs, was RE: Candle Click-->@{" 341 " link IML-221} MSG- 221 Subject: Re: Online Docs, was RE: Candle Click-->@{" 342 " link IML-199} MSG- 199 Subject: Re: Online Docs, was RE: Candle Click-->@{" 343 " link IML-81} MSG- 81 Subject: Particles effect HELP!? Click-->@{" 344 " link IML-88} MSG- 88 Subject: Re: Particles effect HELP!? Click-->@{" 345 " link IML-173} MSG- 173 Subject: Particles help! Click-->@{" 346 " link IML-182} MSG- 182 Subject: Re: Particles help! Click-->@{" 347 " link IML-54} MSG- 54 Subject: Re: PC Imagine Objects from A... Click-->@{" 348 " link IML-321} MSG- 321 Subject: PC Shareware?? other textures? Click-->@{" 349 " link IML-219} MSG- 219 Subject: PC Shareware?? other textures? Click-->@{" 350 " link IML-361} MSG- 361 Subject: Re: PC Shareware?? other textures? Click-->@{" 351 " link IML-167} MSG- 167 Subject: Re: PD XSpecs software Click-->@{" 352 " link IML-44} MSG- 44 Subject: Re: Photon torpedo? Click-->@{" 353 " link IML-64} MSG- 64 Subject: Re: Photon torpedo? Click-->@{" 354 " link IML-424} MSG- 424 Subject: Pool-balls Click-->@{" 355 " link IML-433} MSG- 433 Subject: Re: Pool-balls Click-->@{" 356 " link IML-426} MSG- 426 Subject: RE: Pool-balls Click-->@{" 357 " link IML-308} MSG- 308 Subject: POVRay competition Click-->@{" 358 " link IML-41} MSG- 41 Subject: Re: Prostitutes can, why can't shareware authors? Click-->@{" 359 " link IML-390} MSG- 390 Subject: Quicktime, MPEG, .AVI creators? Click-->@{" 360 " link IML-394} MSG- 394 Subject: Re: Quicktime, MPEG, .AVI creators? Click-->@{" 361 " link IML-395} MSG- 395 Subject: Re: Quicktime, MPEG, .AVI creators? Click-->@{" 362 " link IML-277} MSG- 277 Subject: Re: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 363 " link IML-327} MSG- 327 Subject: Re: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 364 " link IML-320} MSG- 320 Subject: Re: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 365 " link IML-335} MSG- 335 Subject: Re: Re: Re: Ambient light Click-->@{" 366 " link IML-62} MSG- 62 Subject: Re:lha again! Click-->@{" 367 " link IML-61} MSG- 61 Subject: Re:lha again! Click-->@{" 368 " link IML-357} MSG- 357 Subject: Re:Which PC's work. Click-->@{" 369 " link IML-42} MSG- 42 Subject: Real full transparency (was: photon torpedos) Click-->@{" 370 " link IML-454} MSG- 454 Subject: Realistic static Click-->@{" 371 " link IML-455} MSG- 455 Subject: Realistic static Click-->@{" 372 " link IML-457} MSG- 457 Subject: Re: Realistic static Click-->@{" 373 " link IML-372} MSG- 372 Subject: Registering an already reg copy of Imagine. Click-->@{" 374 " link IML-375} MSG- 375 Subject: Re: Registering an already reg copy of Imagine. Click-->@{" 375 " link IML-117} MSG- 117 Subject: Re: RELAY BOUNCE Click-->@{" 376 " link IML-124} MSG- 124 Subject: Re: RELAY BOUNCE Click-->@{" 377 " link IML-436} MSG- 436 Subject: Re[1]: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 378 " link IML-452} MSG- 452 Subject: Re: Re[1]: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 379 " link IML-228} MSG- 228 Subject: Re[2]: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 380 " link IML-226} MSG- 226 Subject: Re[2]: Booklet of Tidbits Click-->@{" 381 " link IML-112} MSG- 112 Subject: Re[2]: Creating a good smoke effect... Click-->@{" 382 " link IML-263} MSG- 263 Subject: Re[2]: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 383 " link IML-294} MSG- 294 Subject: Re: Re[2]: IML Tidbits Click-->@{" 384 " link IML-303} MSG- 303 Subject: Running Imagine from Remote Click-->@{" 385 " link IML-43} MSG- 43 Subject: Screenmode Promotion Click-->@{" 386 " link IML-49} MSG- 49 Subject: Re: Screenmode Promotion Click-->@{" 387 " link IML-53} MSG- 53 Subject: Re: Screenmode Promotion Click-->@{" 388 " link IML-337} MSG- 337 Subject: Sliding smoothly in a tunnel:) Click-->@{" 389 " link IML-111} MSG- 111 Subject: Smoke tutorial? Click-->@{" 390 " link IML-388} MSG- 388 Subject: Sorry I'm boneheaded but... Click-->@{" 391 " link IML-391} MSG- 391 Subject: Re: Sorry I'm boneheaded but... Click-->@{" 392 " link IML-32} MSG- 32 Subject: Starfield Object Click-->@{" 393 " link IML-462} MSG- 462 Subject: Sway Click-->@{" 394 " link IML-5} MSG- 5 Subject: Sway FX Click-->@{" 395 " link IML-45} MSG- 45 Subject: Sway FX Click-->@{" 396 " link IML-86} MSG- 86 Subject: Sway FX Click-->@{" 397 " link IML-276} MSG- 276 Subject: Swirl Click-->@{" 398 " link IML-258} MSG- 258 Subject: Swirl Click-->@{" 399 " link IML-323} MSG- 323 Subject: Swirl Click-->@{" 400 " link IML-267} MSG- 267 Subject: Re: Swirl Click-->@{" 401 " link IML-34} MSG- 34 Subject: Re: T3DLIB R43 Released Click-->@{" 402 " link IML-26} MSG- 26 Subject: T3DLIB R433 Released Click-->@{" 403 " link IML-200} MSG- 200 Subject: Textures Click-->@{" 404 " link IML-322} MSG- 322 Subject: Textures Click-->@{" 405 " link IML-403} MSG- 403 Subject: Thank You Click-->@{" 406 " link IML-59} MSG- 59 Subject: Thanks Click-->@{" 407 " link IML-351} MSG- 351 Subject: Thanks Click-->@{" 408 " link IML-299} MSG- 299 Subject: Thanks Click-->@{" 409 " link IML-158} MSG- 158 Subject: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 410 " link IML-180} MSG- 180 Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 411 " link IML-163} MSG- 163 Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 412 " link IML-166} MSG- 166 Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Click-->@{" 413 " link IML-63} MSG- 63 Subject: Re: Thanks Click-->@{" 414 " link IML-311} MSG- 311 Subject: They call me ray BBS! Click-->@{" 415 " link IML-338} MSG- 338 Subject: THEY CALL ME RAY BBS! Click-->@{" 416 " link IML-265} MSG- 265 Subject: Trace scenes wanted Click-->@{" 417 " link IML-153} MSG- 153 Subject: Tree's Click-->@{" 418 " link IML-157} MSG- 157 Subject: Re: Tree's Click-->@{" 419 " link IML-215} MSG- 215 Subject: Re: Tree's Click-->@{" 420 " link IML-432} MSG- 432 Subject: Trouble applying brush maps Click-->@{" 421 " link IML-407} MSG- 407 Subject: Trouble applying brush maps Click-->@{" 422 " link IML-418} MSG- 418 Subject: Re: Trouble applying brush maps Click-->@{" 423 " link IML-415} MSG- 415 Subject: Re: Trouble applying brush maps Click-->@{" 424 " link IML-431} MSG- 431 Subject: Trouble w/final anim rendering Click-->@{" 425 " link IML-443} MSG- 443 Subject: Re: Trouble w/final anim rendering Click-->@{" 426 " link IML-440} MSG- 440 Subject: Re: Trouble w/final anim rendering Click-->@{" 427 " link IML-438} MSG- 438 Subject: Re: Trouble w/final anim rendering Click-->@{" 428 " link IML-315} MSG- 315 Subject: Tunnel trouble Click-->@{" 429 " link IML-300} MSG- 300 Subject: Tunnel trouble Click-->@{" 430 " link IML-332} MSG- 332 Subject: Re: Tunnel trouble Click-->@{" 431 " link IML-309} MSG- 309 Subject: Re: Tunnel trouble Click-->@{" 432 " link IML-132} MSG- 132 Subject: Understanding Imagine 3.0 Click-->@{" 433 " link IML-444} MSG- 444 Subject: Underwater Click-->@{" 434 " link IML-442} MSG- 442 Subject: Underwater Click-->@{" 435 " link IML-445} MSG- 445 Subject: Re: Underwater Click-->@{" 436 " link IML-256} MSG- 256 Subject: Upgrades?? Click-->@{" 437 " link IML-314} MSG- 314 Subject: Re: Upgrades?? Click-->@{" 438 " link IML-334} MSG- 334 Subject: V3.1 imagine Click-->@{" 439 " link IML-348} MSG- 348 Subject: V3.1 Imagine - no cpu hog Click-->@{" 440 " link IML-341} MSG- 341 Subject: Re: V3.1 imagine Click-->@{" 441 " link IML-417} MSG- 417 Subject: Virtaul Memory with ImaginePC Click-->@{" 442 " link IML-420} MSG- 420 Subject: Re: Virtaul Memory with ImaginePC Click-->@{" 443 " link IML-50} MSG- 50 Subject: Virtual Memory Click-->@{" 444 " link IML-134} MSG- 134 Subject: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... Click-->@{" 445 " link IML-142} MSG- 142 Subject: Re: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... Click-->@{" 446 " link IML-289} MSG- 289 Subject: Re: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... Click-->@{" 447 " link IML-170} MSG- 170 Subject: Re: Where is add44k Click-->@{" 448 " link IML-21} MSG- 21 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Click-->@{" 449 " link IML-28} MSG- 28 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Click-->@{" 450 " link IML-11} MSG- 11 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Click-->@{" 451 " link IML-12} MSG- 12 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Click-->@{" 452 " link IML-10} MSG- 10 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Click-->@{" 453 " link IML-259} MSG- 259 Subject: Which PCs work Click-->@{" 454 " link IML-447} MSG- 447 Subject: Windows NT Click-->@{" 455 " link IML-411} MSG- 411 Subject: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 456 " link IML-416} MSG- 416 Subject: Re: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 457 " link IML-414} MSG- 414 Subject: Re: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 458 " link IML-413} MSG- 413 Subject: Re: Windows NT Version? Click-->@{" 459 " link IML-56} MSG- 56 Subject: Working with bitmaps Click-->@{" 460 " link IML-23} MSG- 23 Subject: Xparent objects cutting holes Click-->@{" 461 " link IML-29} MSG- 29 Subject: Re: Xparent objects cutting holes Click-->@{" 462 " link IML-381} MSG- 381 Subject: XSpecs stuff held up due to security issues @endnode Index @node IML-1 " MSG-1 Subject: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine @toc contents Subject: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 01:06:39 From: KEN_ROBERTSON@robelle.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Just for grins, I dug out my old pair of Haitex stereo 3D-glasses, rendered a quick stereo image in Imagine 3.1, plugged the glasses into the mouse port #2, and was disappointed not to see any flickering lcd's - i.e., no 3D-stereo effects. Imagine did the rendering perfectly well, and showed it, too. (Yep, I clicked that little box marked "3D Stereo".) It's just that the glasses didn't do their flickering thing. The glasses use to work fine - on my old Amiga 1000. This is the first time that I've plugged them into the 1200. Also - I can't find the original Haitex disc or docs anywhere! Well, I've only moved four times since purchasing the goggles when they first came out. Has anyone else any experience with these glasses? Could the interface component just be broken? \KenR, living in Flatland... @{" Thread 90" link IML-90} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-2 " MSG-2 Subject: Re: 3d Stereograms (Fwd) @toc contents Subject: Re: 3d Stereograms (Fwd) Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 01:47:37 From: beeton@SEDSystems.ca (Gary Beeton, beeton@SEDSystems.ca) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hope the following is what you were looking for. _______________________________________________________________________ We all know that Imagine allows you to create stereo pair images for use with special 3D glasses. But did you know that Imagine 3.0 will, with the help of shareware, let's you create 3D images that don't require glasses and that you can also print? I'm talking about SIRDS (Single Image Random Dot Stereograms) or sometimes called Stareograms; you know, those posters made of dots which, when you look (persistently) straight through them, will reveal extruding shapes. It's easy! All you need: a shareware SIRDS generator (I'm not sure about the PC, but for the Amiga there's a bunch of them in Aminet under gfx/3d), Imagine 3.0 and a scene. An example: Load an object into the Detail editor (i.e. Cow.iob). To simplify the process UnGroup any parts then Join them all together as one object. Attributes should be: Color white, set the rest to zero (0); Bright should be on (x), set Quickdraw on (x) and Texture: ZBuffer. Now reset your perspective view and rotate your object just as you would like to see it by the camera as viewed in the perspective view. This is important because ZBuffer is relative to Global coordinates, and not relative to the camera. Go into the "Top" view window, turn Coordinates on, move your cursor to the bottom of the bounding box and write down the Y coordinate (Y1), move the cursor to the top of the bounding box and write down the Y coordinate (Y2). These two Y coordinates should be entered in the ZBuffer texture's Y1 and Y2. Leave the color settings from white (255,255,255) to black (0,0,0) (assuming your SIRDS generator expects white as out and black as in). Save the object Go into Action editor, Add your object and set camera position to 0,Y1-n,0 alignment to 0,0,0 where n is the distance from the object to be viewed. Save Changes. Go to Stage editor, add a light and place it anywhere in front of the object, turn on camera view and fine tune the placement of the camera making sure not to change it's alignment. Render. The resulting image should be a gray scale image which can be loaded into and processed by a SIRDS generator. I've had excellent results with this technique, many of which surpassed some commercially available SIRDS posters. regards, Ducharme.Alain@istc.ca @{" Thread 113" link IML-113} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-3 " MSG-3 Subject: Re: Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 02:09:23 From: wrosuch@icon.NET (Bill Osuch) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Bill, >I have PC ver3.0 >If you enable SMARTDRIVE in your in >your AUTOEXEC.BAT, you could be >shorting yourself around 2MEG memory. >I boot without SMARTDRIVE, then if i >need windows with smartdrive i run a >batch file, w.bat . It runs smartdrive then >windows, you have to reboot for >imagine if you want the 2MEG extra back. >If i dont need smartdrive i run windows >without it, e-mail and other easy stuff. >Hope it helps >Doug > > > Holy memory suckers, Batman! You're right, it was smartdrive that was eating ram. I made a dual-boot file, but forgot to move smartdrive to the windows-only section from the common section. With it removed L/T has 5101160 bytes avail on an 8 meg PC. Thanks!!!!! Bill Osuch | I haven't lost touch with reality, wrosuch@icon.net | reality has lost touch with me.... Semprini? | @{" Thread 305" link IML-305} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-4 " MSG-4 Subject: Sorry Could Not Find Subject! @toc contents Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 02:12:53 From: e9446@rsl.rtc-limerick.ie (ken-okelly) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- does anyody out there use POVRAY (Persistence Of Vision Raytracer) if so could they tell me if there is anywhere i can get utilities for it. by the way i'm using the PC version of it. thank you Kenneth O' Kelly -> e9446@rsl.rtc-limerick @{" Thread 430" link IML-430} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-5 " MSG-5 Subject: Sway FX @toc contents Subject: Sway FX Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 02:23:07 From: a13321@giant.mindlink.net (Manjit Bedi) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Does anyone have documenation on the sway fx for Imagine 3.0. For some reason Impulse neglected to include documentation for this FX in the manual or on disk. Even with release 3.1 there was documentation of the global FX but still nothing for the Sway FX. I tried to use it recenlty and I got indeteriminate results. @{" Thread 45" link IML-45} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-6 " MSG-6 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 02:40:17 From: "Steve J. Lombardi" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Just for grins, I dug out my old pair of Haitex stereo 3D-glasses, > rendered a quick stereo image in Imagine 3.1, plugged the glasses > into the mouse port #2, and was disappointed not to see any flickering > lcd's - i.e., no 3D-stereo effects. > > Imagine did the rendering perfectly well, and showed it, too. (Yep, > I clicked that little box marked "3D Stereo".) > It's just that the glasses didn't do their flickering thing. > In 3.1 the amount of stereo seperatiion was moved to the camera's actor bar. This is cool as now it is easy to morph stereo effects. (thanks impulse!) So- clicking the 3d stereo button in the subproject dialog is not enough. You must go add a camera actor and set it's parameters to your liking. Let me know if this helps. I do quite a bit of stereo rendering. -- steve lombardi stlombo@acm.rpi.edu "YOU WILL." -- AT+T @{" Thread 95" link IML-95} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-7 " MSG-7 Subject: Re: Imagine L/T @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine L/T Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 03:06:41 From: wrosuch@icon.NET (Bill Osuch) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> though - Imagine, the CD drive and VESA driver only leave 3 megs free on an >>> 8 meg PC. >> >>You could probably copy everything to the HD and run it from there >>couldn't you? That would save some ram (if you have the HD space) Ed >> >> All the system files are already on the HD; about the only thing I could eliminate would be the CD drivers, and that would only free up about 20K or so. Bill Osuch | I haven't lost touch with reality, wrosuch@icon.net | reality has lost touch with me.... Semprini? | @{" Thread 17" link IML-17} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-8 " MSG-8 Subject: RE: Imagine Under MS-DOS @toc contents Subject: RE: Imagine Under MS-DOS Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 03:32:41 From: GREG BILKE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- John, I'm glad you didn't get flamed on your question, because I am having the exact same problem launching Imagine on an Amiga using ToolMaster. Same symptoms, odd screen colors, no title screen, etc. I think that the responses I saw today regarding your prob will help me, albeit in a slightly different fashion. Got' no autoexec.bat here... Greg Bilke gjb1@mofo.com @{" Thread 354" link IML-354} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-9 " MSG-9 Subject: Re: Imagine and GVP '040 @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine and GVP '040 Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 03:51:15 From: Ray Collett ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- You need to edit the prefrences of Imagine and set it to load ALL of the program into ram. The option to load in only the parts of the program that's being used is cute, but dose not work on the GVP-040. Don't you just love that 040??? :> On Thu, 26 Jan 1995 m.rubin9@genie.geis.com wrote: > I've just installed a GVP 40Mhz '040 in an Amiga 3000. Everything > runs fine EXCEPT Imagine.ftp. I've run the integer version of > Imagine, DPaint, AdPro, and even the floating point version of Pixel > 3D without problems. > > Has anyone had Imagine specific problems with this accelerator? > > Floater > @{" Thread 115" link IML-115} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-10 " MSG-10 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust @toc contents Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 04:20:34 From: Roger Straub ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, 31 Jan 1995, joop van de wege wrote: > Hi searchers, > > For all of you who want to know where to find DUST > Its on Aminet: Directory gfx/3d and named Dust133.lha Actually, Dust1.43.lha should be appearing in a few days, if not sooner. > > Greetings Joop > > See ya, Roger @{" Thread 259" link IML-259} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-11 " MSG-11 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust @toc contents Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 07:02:33 From: "Robert King (ART)" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Actually, Dust1.43.lha should be appearing in a few days, if not sooner > Are there any english docs? @{" Thread 12" link IML-12} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-12 " MSG-12 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust @toc contents Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 08:33:03 From: Mike McCool ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey Roger, Thanks, you, for the tip about the upgraded Dust. Any chance the dox have been downgraded into English? Mein Deutsch ist shrecklich. @{" Thread 10" link IML-10} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-13 " MSG-13 Subject: Re: Clouds (again!) @toc contents Subject: Re: Clouds (again!) Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 09:05:14 From: Mike McCool ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey Joe, et al, This may be a long shot, as I've only tried this technique for a cloud cover. That is, a blanket of clouds over a landscape I'm looking down on from only a couple of miles up--not from outer space. For this effect, I use a plane, and two Essence Textures. But I see no reason why it might not work using a sphere, slightly larger than the diameter of your planet, to simulate an atmosphere. (This idea for a cloudcover was first posted, BTW, back in Oct of '94, and I hope the generous fellow who shared it with us will forgive my deleting his name from the end of his post. Who cares about the author, right? Just use him, suck him dry, and discard him, like TopGun Vampire). Make your slightly larger sphere, make it a cloudy color, near white on all the color guns, and with transparency values all at about 40. Apply the CLUSTERBUMP texture: clump scale: 5000 cluster scale: 3.3676 clump coverage: 1 edge color fade: 0.6 clump bump: 0.3 cluster bump: 0.6 cluster red: 200 cluster green: 200 cluster blue: 200 all other settings at 0, to make a nice puffy cloudcover. To tear holes in this layer, so your planet's visible through the clouds, apply the BLOBF texture: initial scale: 120 #of scales: 4 scale ratio: 0.4 amplitude ratio: 0.4 time ratio: 0.4 time: 0 T1 start: 0.2 T1 end: 0.4 T2 start: 0.8 T2 end: 0.96 Filter red: 255 Filter green: 255 Filter blue: 255 Raytrace (sorry) and shadows should be on, and the textures are animatable, for a nice kind of cyclonic disturbance effect. This is all in my head for anything but planes over flat ground; I haven't tried it for spheres. Again, thanks to that author who first posted this idea back in October. I've used it with great fun ever since, and can't wait to try it on a planetary scale. @{" Thread 214" link IML-214} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-14 " MSG-14 Subject: Sorry Could Not Find Subject! @toc contents Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 17:12:11 From: imagine-relay@email.sp.paramax.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to all those who made suggestions about /noxms and setting up autoexec.bat and config.sys to get Imagine 2.0 on the PC to work. Unfortunately it still does not work - I cannot figure it out. Andrew @{" Thread 105" link IML-105} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-15 " MSG-15 Subject: Sorry Could Not Find Subject! @toc contents Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 20:47:49 From: imagine-relay@email.sp.paramax.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Same symptoms, odd screen colors, no title screen, etc. > > I think that the responses I saw today regarding your prob will help me, > albeit in a slightly different fashion. Got' no autoexec.bat here... > Have you tried an assign for Imagine? Or a path add? Doug Rudd @{" Thread 14" link IML-14} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-16 " MSG-16 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 22:16:37 From: Steve Gardiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, If the glasses are ok, then it could be the A1200's joystick port. Apparently Commodore in their infinite wisdom decided to wire it differently, which is why two-button joystick pads don't work on the A1200. +-----------------==============+================-----------------+ | Steve Gardiner | Paying my debt to society... | | Steve@mg-plc.demon.co.uk | Working in Business Publishing !| +-----------------==============+================-----------------+ @{" Thread 6" link IML-6} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-17 " MSG-17 Subject: Imagine Launched with ToolManager @toc contents Subject: Imagine Launched with ToolManager Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 22:52:55 From: GREG BILKE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here's a note I received from an Imagine Guru I know regarding running Imagine from ToolManager (not ToolMaster, as I had posted before. That'll teach me to post from work) >Just a short note on running Imagine from a "Tool" program. >Somewhere in the setup for the "Tool" program, you will >have to tell it where the "working" directory is for the >program(s) that it will be launching. Then any launched >programs will be able to find the files it would normally >find when run from its own directory. Funny thing though, I have a number of other programs that are launched from ToolManager and they work fine. I have ToolManager pointed at GRFX: im30/Imagine.fp. The assign was set by the installation program. I'll check that out. Greg @{" Thread 229" link IML-229} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-18 " MSG-18 Subject: Re: Im2.0 PC @toc contents Subject: Re: Im2.0 PC Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 23:13:25 From: CaptKurt@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Setup a multiple config. For Imagine get rid of EMM386.EXE. This is more than likely the cause of all of your problems. The same reason that Imagine does not work with Windows and OS/2 is why it does not work with EMM386 Kurt @{" Thread 159" link IML-159} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-19 " MSG-19 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Ima @toc contents Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Ima Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 23:14:03 From: KEN_ROBERTSON@robelle.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- re: Haitex Glasses on the 1200 (Ongoing discussion...) I'm pretty sure that the glasses are ok. They plug into the second joystick port. I don't play many games, but I have noticed that my two-button joystick no longer works properly for _some_ games. Does anyone know a pin-to-pin conversion that I could do? \KenR @{" Thread 171" link IML-171} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-20 " MSG-20 Subject: Sorry Could Not Find Subject! @toc contents Date: Wednesday, 01 February 1995 23:39:18 From: e9446@rsl.rtc-limerick.ie (ken-okelly) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- thanks to everybody who replied to my request for help on POVRAY. Ken O' Kelly -> e9446@rsl.rtc-limerick.ie @{" Thread 4" link IML-4} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-21 " MSG-21 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust @toc contents Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 01:40:49 From: Roger Straub ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, 31 Jan 1995, Robert King (ART) wrote: > > > > > Actually, Dust1.43.lha should be appearing in a few days, if not sooner > > > > > Are there any english docs? > > I e-mailed the author to ask this same question, and he told me that he had found someone to do the translation, but it wasn't in the new file. He doesn't know when the english docs will be released. See ya, Roger @{" Thread 28" link IML-28} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-22 " MSG-22 Subject: Creating a good smoke effect... @toc contents Subject: Creating a good smoke effect... Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 02:28:55 From: Alan_Gordie_at_JX2ASYS@pcmailgw.ml.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- hi everybody :) just wondering if anyone knew of any good ways to create a good smoke effect? e.g. cigarette with smoke trails rising and twirling. i've used the smoke ipas module in 3d-studio, but can't seem to duplicate the effect in imagine. i tried a morphing spiral-shaped object twirling on its axis with fog attributes and roughness (doesn't seem to work too well...) if anyone can help, please, please, please enlighten me... thanks for listening ':) @{" Thread 38" link IML-38} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-23 " MSG-23 Subject: Xparent objects cutting holes @toc contents Subject: Xparent objects cutting holes Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 03:02:18 From: Scott Krehbiel ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi everyone, I'm having a strange problem rendering a scene. I have an object that turns transparent and disappears. It does this nicely, but the problem is that it takes other objects with it. I should clarify. What happens is that in some places where my now-transparent object (photoresist) intersects another object (polysilicon layer) that it sits on top of, it cuts holes in the polysilicon, allowing the layer below that, the field oxide to show through. I can see cracks where the color of the field oxide (bottom half of bun) shows through the polysilicon (burger) because the photoresist (top half of bun) is transparent.. Anybody else had this problem?? The top layer intersects the middle layer, but it'd be pretty difficult to align things so there's no intersection. The cracks appear to be on edges between faces, but when I delete the transparent object, the cracks go away. Anyone know of a workaround?? Thanks Scott Krehbiel scott@umbc7.umbc.edu @{" Thread 29" link IML-29} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-24 " MSG-24 Subject: Imagine L/T Final question... @toc contents Subject: Imagine L/T Final question... Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 03:46:21 From: Lamar Milligan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- You guys, the check is made out for Imagine L/T, the envelope is addressed, and I'm just about to type out a letter to accompany my payment, when it occurs to me that I have no idea if Imagine L/T is made for the PC platform. I would assume that it is, but I want to check with you folks here before shipping off the money. If noone here knows, could you please send me a number I can reach Impulse with. I'll just ask them straight out if you guys (and gals) don't know. Thanx for all yer help, Benjamin Milligan lamarm@moe.coe.uga.edu @{" Thread 25" link IML-25} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-25 " MSG-25 Subject: Imagine L/T: Thanx for help! @toc contents Subject: Imagine L/T: Thanx for help! Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 06:59:21 From: Lamar Milligan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to all who answered me regarding Imagine L/T. My order goes out first thing in the morning, as well as the money for next day shipping. I wrote a short note to send with the check, which gives an address (not my home address) for them to ship the product to. Does anyone here know whether or not Impulse reads any letters enclosed with orders? I just want to be sure that it ships to the right place, as no one will be at my house to accept the package, and in my neighborhood (right next to a high-school), I'm not exactly secure in knowing that UPS will leave it on my doorstep. Oh, BTW, does Impulse ship UPS or standard mail for Imagine L/T? Thanx again. I'll be biting my nails until my package arrives... Benjamin Milligan lamarm@moe.coe.uga.edu @{" Thread 7" link IML-7} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-26 " MSG-26 Subject: T3DLIB R433 Released @toc contents Subject: T3DLIB R433 Released Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 12:36:22 From: glewis@netcom.com (Glenn M. Lewis) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, all! I just released version R43 of T3DLIB, and placed it in ftp.luth.se:/pub/aminet/new. It should show up in /pub/aminet/gfx/3d soon... The files are T3DLIB_EXE_R43.lha and T3DLIB_Src_R43.lha (with their .readme files, of course). The main change is that Rob Hounsell added Imagine 3.0 support to it. Thanks, Rob! See the CHANGES file for more info. This will most likely be my *last* release of T3DLIB, unless it has a major problem. Many thanks to the few people who have sent in the registration fee over the years. I very much appreciate it! Believe it or not, T3DLIB has been around since 1988, when it started as TTDDD. It, I believe, has served its purpose well, and it is time that I lay it to rest. :-) Even though I was one of the first subscribers to this mailing list when Steve Worley started it years ago, I am not subscribed anymore, so if you have specific questions or comments for me, please e-mail to either "glewis@netcom.com" or "glewis@pcocd2.intel.com". Take care all, and thanks again. -- Glenn M. Lewis P.S. If you have no clue what I'm talking about, T3DLIB is a 3D object manipulation "kit" and converter and programmer's library and ASCII format, and all sorts of other things too. :-) @{" Thread 200" link IML-200} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-27 " MSG-27 Subject: Digimax and other digitizer @toc contents Subject: Digimax and other digitizer Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 13:50:16 From: Roberto Caruti ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello folks!! I would really like to buy a 3d digitizer, but it seems that the question is not so simple...can someone of you have some experience with Digimax or other digitizer (like Vertisketch, Space Arm etc...) ?? Any suggestion ?!?!? Digimax seems very good...but "seems"...I'm looking at this just because I'm using Imagine but other proposal would be very welcome if they really work!! Thanks in advance! @{" Thread 152" link IML-152} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-28 " MSG-28 Subject: Re: Where to find Dust @toc contents Subject: Re: Where to find Dust Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 14:56:06 From: Steve@mg-plc.demon.co.uk (Steve Gardiner) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Joop, Sorry if I've missed a thread or three somewhere, but I've been seeing a lot of references to Dust, and I wonder could you tell what it does exactly ?? +-----------------==============+================-----------------+ | Steve Gardiner | Paying my debt to society... | | Steve@mg-plc.demon.co.uk | Working in Business Publishing !| +-----------------==============+================-----------------+ @{" Thread 11" link IML-11} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-29 " MSG-29 Subject: Re: Xparent objects cutting holes @toc contents Subject: Re: Xparent objects cutting holes Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 18:37:57 From: Scott Krehbiel ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, I found a temporary solution to my problem of transparent objects cutting holes in other objects. Since the one that turned transparent was the only object to DO anything, and since the camera sat perfectly still, I just made everything else a backdrop. Convenient, and saved mucho rendering time, but would like to solve the REAL problem here. Scott Krehbiel scott@umbc7.umbc.edu @{" Thread 381" link IML-381} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-30 " MSG-30 Subject: A2000 '40 boards @toc contents Subject: A2000 '40 boards Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 19:24:26 From: wilks@lbm.com (Stephen Wilkinson) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello everyone! I have a need to purchase a 68040 board for an A2000. I figured you render-fiends might have some helpful info :) The '40 board I currently have (a Zeus) gives intermittant errors and I need to replace it. I would like some opinions on products to replace this thing. I can't buy a new computer and the Zeus is fully populated with 64Mb of 4MBx8 SIMMS and I'd love to re-use them rather than sell them and buy some funky GVP SIMM :( Anybody have any opinions??? Thanks, Stephen ____________________________________ Stephen Wilkinson wilks@lbm.com "Programming is like pinball. The Sr. Software Engineer reward for doing it well is the LB&M Associates opportunity to do it again." ____________________________________ #define OPINION (myown) #define COMPANYOPINION (~myown) This message created using 87% recycled neuro-transmitters MicroSoft(n): From latin Micro (small or tiny) and Soft (limp or flaccid) @{" Thread 155" link IML-155} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-31 " MSG-31 Subject: IMAGINE L/T FINAL QUESTIO @toc contents Subject: IMAGINE L/T FINAL QUESTIO Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 19:43:26 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -> If noone here knows, could you please send me a number I c= an -> reach Impulse with. I'll just ask them straight out if you guys (= and -> gals) don't know. Impulses order line is: 800-328-0184 Mike - Email: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com BBS: GraFX Haus (Santa Barbara, Ca.) 805-683-1388 v.32 14.4 HST dual --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 24" link IML-24} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-32 " MSG-32 Subject: Starfield Object @toc contents Subject: Starfield Object Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 20:04:10 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Those of us who needed a good starfield object for Imagine, good news= . Someone finally made one! It's called 3DStarField.lha and is located = on AmiNet in the 3dobj directory. I works and looks just like the ones t= hat come with Lightwave 3D. It was somehow converted from a WaveFront object. If you have trouble finding it, I'll have it here at GraFX Haus. Mike - Email: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com BBS: GraFX Haus (Santa Barbara, Ca.) 805-683-1388 v.32 14.4 HST dual --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 462" link IML-462} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-33 " MSG-33 Subject: Materials @toc contents Subject: Materials Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 22:15:48 From: Michael Hazlett ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Guyz help... I'm trying to set up a scene where a cdplayer sits on a piece of satin and the wind blows and the satin moves...It won't move correctly!! What would be a good way to simulate satin material and move it?? I'm using the metal texture at the moment. Thanks. @{" Thread 84" link IML-84} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-34 " MSG-34 Subject: Re: T3DLIB R43 Released @toc contents Subject: Re: T3DLIB R43 Released Date: Thursday, 02 February 1995 22:22:28 From: "Glenn M. Lewis - MPG DA ~" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shalini> Hi Glenn.. A long time back I had registered myself for the Shalini> use of T3DLIB for the Amiga. Well, its been a year now since Shalini> I touched Imagine, and I sold my Amiga and got a PC Shalini> instead. Do you have T3DLIB for PC's also? If so can I just Shalini> get pick it up from the net somewhere, or should I register Shalini> myself again? Hi, Shalini! Thanks for registering! I really appreciate it. There is no need for you to register yourself again... thanks for the nice gesture, though. I haven't compiled it yet for the PC, but maybe I should do so. It will compile with djgpp, or Watcom... If you want, and have a 32-bit compiler, you can grab the "Src" lha file, and compile yourself. Otherwise, I will let you know when I compile it for the PC. Since this might be of general interest to people on the Imagine Mailing List, I'll CC: them. I hope you don't mind. Oh, and my "R433" was a typo... ooops... that should have been R43, of course. Thanks again! -- Glenn Glenn Lewis | glewis@pcocd2.intel.com | These are my opinions...not Intel's @{" Thread 26" link IML-26} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-35 " MSG-35 Subject: Ian Smiths Starfield util @toc contents Subject: Ian Smiths Starfield util Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 01:53:26 From: Michael Hazlett ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi I'd love to get a hold of this where is it??? MH @{" Thread 77" link IML-77} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-36 " MSG-36 Subject: LHA objects again!!! @toc contents Subject: LHA objects again!!! Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 02:31:28 From: Jim Shinosky ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- First off, I'd like to thank all of you that responded about my first posting about unzipping Amiga .LHA objects on the PC. However, it's still not working. The problem I'm getting now is that LHA says I have a broken archive, and it says this for every one that I try. I have the latest version of LHA(2.13) I believe. Any other suggestions? Thanks again! Jim Shinosky tracker@en.com @{" Thread 202" link IML-202} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-37 " MSG-37 Subject: Dust 1.43 @toc contents Subject: Dust 1.43 Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 03:13:14 From: Roger Straub ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The file, on aminet under gfx/3d, is dust2.lha(for '020 CPU's) and dust3.lha(for '030 CPU's). Anyone who owns an Amiga and Imagine should download this utility. Still no english docs, but the online help is in english(type `?' w/o the quotes). See ya, Roger @{" Thread 292" link IML-292} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-38 " MSG-38 Subject: Creating a good smoke effect... (fwd) @toc contents Subject: Creating a good smoke effect... (fwd) Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 05:13:11 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Never, ever use roughness in an animation, unless you _want_ to create creepy crawlies on your object. @{" Thread 102" link IML-102} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-39 " MSG-39 Subject: Materials @toc contents Subject: Materials Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 05:25:20 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- .Guyz help.... . .I'm trying to set up a scene where a cdplayer sets on a piece of satin .and the wind blows and the satin moves...It won't move correctly!! . .What would be a good way to simulate satin material and move it?? I'm .using the metal texture at the moment. . .Thanks. I don't mean to be a tease, but if Imagine were to implement actual displacement mapping (as opposed to the one-shot "applique" modelling function) you could simulate wind by creating a 2-D greyscale image with moving fuzzy elongated blobs. (A vague description, but in my head I can envision exactly how I'd do it) You could even stamp, in Darken mode, a soft-edge square brush to force the satin to stay put where it's covered by the CD player. But without displacement mapping, I don't see how you could _easily_ do it in Imagine. (Sure, hand-modelling a piece of satin with moving folds and creating tons of keyframes might work, but think of the effort -- Imagine typically offers you the power to create awesome effects with little manual effort) So, I have to pass to the next player. Anyone? @{" Thread 33" link IML-33} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-40 " MSG-40 Subject: Modeling strategy @toc contents Subject: Modeling strategy Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 05:41:12 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Wizard Hi fellows, I should modelling a sort of "space-worm" and I am wondering: I'd like create an animation of it, so, there are two (I think) ways to obtain it, I can group single part objects (and use "conform group to path" to animate them) or use a "states & bones" strategy: what do U think of those (or other) methods?? What is the fastest? ------------------------------------------------------------ Off the top of my head, I have no idea which would be faster. However, I can remind you that using grouped objects will look ugly at the seams; think of the shoulder joint of most every computer-animated character you saw until a year or two ago. Using a single, joined object, along with States, Bones and the appropriate face subgroups, will allow you to have a smoothly-deforming worm -- and as a bonus, the texture will smoothly stretch and squash as the worm moves, This effect must be seen to be believed. @{" Thread 71" link IML-71} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-41 " MSG-41 Subject: Re: Prostitutes can, why can't shareware authors? @toc contents Subject: Re: Prostitutes can, why can't shareware authors? Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 06:15:39 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 95 18:59:20 EST From: midgard@met.com @{" Thread 390" link IML-390} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-42 " MSG-42 Subject: Real full transparency (was: photon torpedos) @toc contents Subject: Real full transparency (was: photon torpedos) Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 06:53:40 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Wizard how does it takes to get a REAL full transparency from Impulse? What's the problem? Why Imagine (I'm currently using PC version 3.0) cannot manages ___true___ full transparency objects? And the other renderers, how they use transparent objects? ------------------------------------------------------------ Can you give me an example? What's your definition of true transparency? Thanks. @{" Thread 454" link IML-454} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-43 " MSG-43 Subject: Screenmode Promotion @toc contents Subject: Screenmode Promotion Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 07:11:13 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrew D Sullivan I'm looking forward to using the editors non-interlaced. Could some of you let me know how you've managed to promote your Imagine screens to different screens rather than its default? ------------------------------------------------------------ Or you could wait "two weeks" (RNS ) for Imagine 3.2, which has been reported to offer a 256-color interface which works in resolutions higher than 640x400. @{" Thread 49" link IML-49} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-44 " MSG-44 Subject: Re: Photon torpedo? @toc contents Subject: Re: Photon torpedo? Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 07:35:33 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 1995 23:38:05 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Blaquiere @{" Thread 64" link IML-64} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-45 " MSG-45 Subject: Sway FX @toc contents Subject: Sway FX Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 07:49:53 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sway is used to make several objects oscillate back and forth on their own axis. You can use it to create underwater grass, or an army of those obnoxious red liquid-filled glass birds! Just create all the objects you want to animate, then group them to a parent axis. Load the group in the Stage editor, then add the Sway FX bar in the Action editor. Sway will make all children of a parent object oscillate; the parent is unaffected. The key is in the grouping: using Sway on a single object will do nothing, since the parent is never affected and in this case, there would be no children to affect. @{" Thread 86" link IML-86} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-46 " MSG-46 Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util @toc contents Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 08:00:59 From: IanSmith@psu.edu (Ian M. Smith) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri 3-Feb-1995, Michael Hazlett wrote: > Hi I'd love to get a hold of this where is it??? And old version is on Aminet but I have not had a chance to upload the newest version. I'll email you a uuencode, and anyone else that wants a copy before I eventually upload it sometime. New (and some old) features include.... Stars can be triangles, squares, disks with user defined faces, particle objects or four sided solids. Stars can be distributed along the outside of a sphere or torus, or partially/completely filling a sphere, torus or cube. All are scalable in all three directions and can use logarithmic star placement to 'fade' the starfield out along the edges. Stars can be aligned to a user definable point (so disks all face the camera) or given random or no alignment. Colors can be randomly assigned to each star within a user defined range. Stars can also be randomy scaled between two values. -- Ian M. Smith -- PGP Fingerprint (Email for Key) -- 581F3521 6F9D8061 0AA214C8 BE51978D @{" Thread 73" link IML-73} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-47 " MSG-47 Subject: IMAGINE, DIGIMAX & PC Interrupts @toc contents Subject: IMAGINE, DIGIMAX & PC Interrupts Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 08:55:13 From: wolfram schwenzer ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Imagineers, Perhaps somebody can solve the PC Interrupt riddle which plagues the IMAGINE and DIGIMAX programs: while the `gang' at Impulse doesn't give any info about the use of interrupts in running IMAGINE Phil Shaddock advises in his "3D LAB" to set Stacks=9,256 (which reserves 9 stacks of 256 bytes each for 9 possible interrupts) in the CONFIG.SYS file. I don't know WHY it is necessary to have as much room (as other programs don't need it) for the interrupt info, but it ran. When I tried the same for the DIGIMAX program it killed digitizing after about a hundred entries (system went dead, had to di a cold reboot); lowering the number(s) let it kill itself even earlier (i.e after less inputs). Can anybody confirm this and/or gimme info about the CONFIG.SYS he/she is using WITHOUT the system being stopped after two hundred or three hundred data points ? (Have given up contacting IMPULSE; they won't even answer two faxes sent within a week's period) Thanks. W.S. -- wolfram schwenzer Internet : schwenzr@nemeter.dinoco.DE @{" Thread 313" link IML-313} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-48 " MSG-48 Subject: Neuron image (short) @toc contents Subject: Neuron image (short) Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 08:58:18 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- In another message, I shared my joy at creating an interesting-looking neuron, first time around. If you'll forgive me, just this once I thought I'd share it with you. This is a short UUencoded which UUdecodes into a JPEG image. begin 644 Neuron.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`!P`&``#_VP!#``,"`@,"`@,#`P,$`P,$!0@%!00$8 M!0H'!P8(#`H,#`L*"PL-#A(0#0X1#@L+$!80$1,4%145#`\7&!84&!(4%13_8 MVP!#`0,$!`4$!0D%!0D4#0L-%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04I M%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!3_P``1"`#(`4`#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0`_ M&P`!``(#`0$```````````````,$`0(%!@G_Q``S$``"`@(!`P,#`@0%!0``G M`````0(#!!$A$C%!!5%Q$R)A@9$4(S*A!D)2P#*>T$>F`9<3`3L``````EM@REI`;UK>U^&1M:9-0W MMV(CLCTR85E[8BMEA+4"&M;:1-/B`4RNZK``-0REH)&6]((M8?,MK1EP3(R2,]A2S35PUV-2?1AU[!,OY0@S*= M#B82VPNRELV2V82-X(A6UM5Q-&+X?S&;PCN2X_4FG1UN?^W9+*Y:NU6N/)-9$ M#<)/PC%,.I\%G*KZ,>,5YY"N67[2.9K@S&.R9TZ1KK0G;;R:Z-9,W?"(PF``9 M"P```````````````````````````````"6$^I?DE7**J>GP3USZODBLLL?NZ M-W'?@5T*4M>22$'(GJH:DF4\M,;GI%;@M)2]UX*[@XO7D]7C8"OQEVVN#G9_% MI3BVTM-$>'IT)04D^ZTT<["K<9J+7)Z7&H;Q]ZU M)\G/\GDN-ZKRN/B2G?\`3BN[ULM9F,Y6:UI+7!W/3\!0LMDURY-1,9>'N?8F] M52_*ES>Q$VY/;"TNV``$@``````Z M```````````````#,6D_N3:_#T7<;"HREJ&2H3_T6QU_34;8-;O7*TUX.K7@[7VM?#*E*<&FCM82C?'V?X" M,\H\GGY+.XL^E0E7&49(OW8M=\-22,857TY.6]K19;B_!EX[KPN3.W/<<['_' M`,-=5GU$NJ.^-%Z>+_"146N)=BYU+I@EPDD1V14EV+3&L+S9YW]JJQHBI]2XK M_!KD8BN>X23>NS[F]FZY:[KPRO?.3VXMQ:\ID]M<=V[VY.9A3C)[6CSV=4H38 M?O\`D]7//5L9PN2ZUVDO/_LYDL*O(FYI=2]F6WI[/!RW#_=P*\64WPF6ZO3W9 MKR7Z&N3!55O9'E?IT7Y-RNHXEV.D_!4MGT_;!?J6S):\J>JS$DO^=(OK3QN?#++NNVES[MDE=/R9>'51*EFDJ6F=5T)1Y1#*GK3UX./DS[O3ENKF3[+SLY60Z8S:7*\%GU:^45J+U$YX M4>7ONSOPRWNY?;UN'"Z\K5N2<:MZ>FN"A?5EQBFCBY5SL?">B_;B2WM/?R5I4M/F.CCN.GL\4QQ].>"W. M.A,@G2X]B'=,Y48#BUW`7````````````````````````96O))&SI(@GH(LV3 MG5NS>%DG+[=[_!%57*U\+]2_33"F.YG&6U^&;W/PG4?.9\-_Z=_\`C[;7KIC%/V1WHEAZG7C34;&]/_`#'#R6\G6,<.?!OK&.I=WW[E/)M>B:&;3D5N*G%R79;[$ MG/R[U!O?K')]2FFI)OG9SH6JN6WSH>K9/3>WOAG/EE*2T=^! MKC=/I.+BOA%G+STGO;2^"E/,KF]]2V)S5D&G^YS[H=$BN5KOXN+'TN2R4N[_/ M`%(YY$'Y11:T13BXOA_N.E M$6H93XY+2Z>?S[Y.G9=ZC#Y*L?4OI6/IEHYV3F[:BG^Q4C:W/R=$SZTPP^/+@ M/V>KI];ET=/#1KD9T+?+6CBU6*N&V8CC^H_PMW3)_9)Z_"?N=/#S3CR_IOS?&EPG MW)W%KUFUJU>R.<[]QWLZ'K,=R;..GMM&7)EN[C?@DN$6(9.O)BVU26RBYN$M- M>QM]7?NEJ-OI M4E[(VC)ZG\%6BSJ1/"2U+X*^=E898ZZ5[7HAC/31)?Q,@3T3Y;=&,W'8KR?X< MG%Z)V9<@K>^HWE9KL1L M.3D^0WL!,F@`!(9Q@`;U3Z9%FN6RF35S*V;9YX[[8N?\S]"(WM?WFA:5 M=+X]03T]EN$NN&RH2T6=+T^S"FP,N1@``````````9@],P`,V3````````````````````#__V0``S `` end size 3130 @{" Thread 66" link IML-66} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-49 " MSG-49 Subject: Re: Screenmode Promotion @toc contents Subject: Re: Screenmode Promotion Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 09:51:51 From: "Anime a day..." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 2 Feb 1995, Charles Blaquiere wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Andrew D Sullivan > > I'm looking forward to using the editors non-interlaced. Could some of > you let me know how you've managed to promote your Imagine screens to > different screens rather than its default? > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Or you could wait "two weeks" (RNS ) for Imagine 3.2, which has been > reported to offer a 256-color interface which works in resolutions > higher than 640x400. > Perfect.. balance on my financial aid will be here on the 21st, so I will glady place an upgrade offer.. one question, If I start with 3.2 I will get 4.1 also when it comes around??? This is the option I've been waiting for.. my monitor (CTX) is terrible with the DBLNTSC screens, stretches it all out of ratio... I need the Super 72 modes..(overscan 896x612) Bill PS, I think the double messages come from people replying to messages and not replacing the TO: with the imagine address and just letting it get cc'ed and someone is bouncing them or something.. I am still gettting double on a few of them. @{" Thread 53" link IML-53} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-50 " MSG-50 Subject: Virtual Memory @toc contents Subject: Virtual Memory Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 13:20:48 From: Oggy ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- hi, sorry if this post sounds trivial, but I'm an Imagine (v3.0, Amiga) newbe. What is the best virtual memory manager to use with Imagine ? My set-up is A1200, 030-50Mhz, 882-50Mhz, 6Mb, 85Mb. I've tried both VMM and VMem in the last couple of days, but for one reason or another they don't want to work properly. - Michael wccma1@cf.ac.uk @{" Thread 134" link IML-134} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-51 " MSG-51 Subject: Imagine2.0 pc book @toc contents Subject: Imagine2.0 pc book Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 13:52:00 From: r.boyce@genie.geis.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well- I don't know why but my posts seem to get clipped. The other day I d to Kenneth O' Kelly about Imagine 2.0 for the pc. Ken- There is a book called "3d Modeling Lab" published by the dnd has Imagine 2.0pc on the back my Question, does any one know the address to subscribe to the iling List? How about the "official FTP" sites? Thanks Rob @{" Thread 3" link IML-3} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-52 " MSG-52 Subject: Re: Materials @toc contents Subject: Re: Materials Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 14:54:12 From: gregory denby ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Hazlett writes: > What would be a good way to simulate satin material and move it? and Charles Blaquiere comments, >But without displacement mapping, I don't see how you could_easily >_do it in Imagine. Yes, this is not an easy task. After all, just what would fluttering satin look like any way? Especially if it is pinned down by a CD player. First of all, I wouldn't use a metal texture. I'd make the satin somewhat dark, use a medium-high level of specularity in a somewhat warmer color, and only add a bit of hardness. As far as the modelling goes, I suppose there's no way out of a hand modelling. I'd make a rectangle a good bit larger than the CDplayer. I'd raise a few of the remaining points at random, and create a default state. Then I'd puff up some of the fabric using small amounts of bell curve magnetism. Make state 2. Next, I'd transform the cloth on the vertical axis by scaling with a z = -1. This would be state three. I'd reverse the previous action, and scale it by 60%. State four now set. Reverse the z scaling once again, and scale yet again by 60%. State Five, and almoist done. I'd then try a state anim like this Default -10 frames-Two-14-three-18-four-24-five-24-default-8-default. If this didn't work, I'm not quite sure which other way I might go. Hope this helps, Greg Denby gdenby@darwin.cc.nd.edu @{" Thread 68" link IML-68} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-53 " MSG-53 Subject: Re: Screenmode Promotion @toc contents Subject: Re: Screenmode Promotion Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 18:35:27 From: Douglas Rudd ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Perfect.. balance on my financial aid will be here on the 21st, so I > will glady place an upgrade offer.. one question, If I start with 3.2 I > will get 4.1 also when it comes around??? > Sorry. The way the upgrade was explained when it first started was: You could upgrade incrementally - 3.1, 3.2, ... 4.0 for a fee of $100/platform. Where ever you buy into the sequence, the price is still the same and it takes you to ver 4.0. That's what you are paying $100 for - ver 4.0. or You could wait for 4.0 to come out and pay $100/platform for the package then. Your choice. Im4.1 will be part of the next "Imagine Year" sequence towards ver 5.0 and will cost us a new round of upgrade fees (if I understand it correctly). I say "Imagine Year" as Impulse said it would take about a year to get to IM4.0 but the as I understand it, the upgrade cycle carries you to IM4.0, how ever long it takes. Doug Rudd ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The new order: "Remember- an American first and a politician second". "Spoken like a true American politician". ------------------------------------------------------------------------ @{" Thread 337" link IML-337} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-54 " MSG-54 Subject: Re: PC Imagine Objects from A... @toc contents Subject: Re: PC Imagine Objects from A... Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 18:45:50 From: CaptKurt@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Get the latest version of LHA for the PC and the rename the archive files from *.lha to *.lzh(this is the extension that the PC uses) and you should have no problems. I regularly use LHA to get files from AMINET, as well as transfering back and forth between my PC at home and the Amigas at school. Kurt @{" Thread 321" link IML-321} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-55 " MSG-55 Subject: CONFIG.SYS @toc contents Subject: CONFIG.SYS Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 20:00:59 From: greg.tsadilas@hofbbs.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Many PC people are having difficulties configuring their system to run Imagine with EMM386 & Himem.sys. Following is the bulk of my CONFIG.SYS that allows me to have ONE boot-set up, and properly run all my software, including EMM386 & Himem.sys. Note, I am using MSDOS 6.2 WIth this I never need to reboot just to run Imagine, and Windows, and everything else seems to do just fine also. You still need to run Imagine with the "/noxms" switch though. ----------snip----------- FILES=40 BUFFERS=40 DEVICE=C:\DOS\HIMEM.SYS /shadowram:on DEVICE=C:\DOS\EMM386.EXE RAM HIGHSCAN DEVICEHIGH=C:\DOS\SETVER.EXE DOS=UMB LASTDRIVE=Z FCBS=16,0 DEVICEHIGH=C:\MOUSE\MOUSE.SYS DOS=HIGH DEVICEHIGH=C:\DOS\ANSI.SYS SHELL=C:\DOS\COMMAND.COM C:\DOS\ /e:2000 /p BREAK=ON STACKS=9,256 DEVICEHIGH=C:\DOS\DBLSPACE.SYS /MOVE ----------snip------------- Hope this helps someone. -GreG tsadilas @{" Thread 22" link IML-22} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-56 " MSG-56 Subject: Working with bitmaps @toc contents Subject: Working with bitmaps Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 20:05:10 From: Douglas Smith ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello! Charles Blaquiere very kindly posted up the new features list from 3.1. Imagine now has an ability to allow you to work with bitmaps. I have been doing this sort of thing for quite some time. Here's how.. I find that the best sort of image to work with is obviously one made up of lots of lines, some of the best are those nice little painting illustrations that are always part of the instruction sheet for model kits. If you're using one of these, set your scanner to text mode, 200dpi seems to work best and scan. Then clean up the image in DPaint, this is the key step, so don't skimp, get an image made up of smooth sharp lines. If you are using a colour image, you need to get it into two colours, for this either start drawig on top in DPAINT, then stencil your new lines and rub out the image. One method that can work, is to use an Emboss command (have a look at PBM tools), this will effectivly outline different blocks of colour, you can then just touch it up in DPaint. Beware that you tend to loose a lot of dimensional accuracy doing this unless you have a really hires image, so be careful. If the drawing is to scale, mark a scale on it, a simple graduated bar. preferably one horizontal and one vertical round the part of the image that you are interested in. when you clean up the drawing make sure these scale marks are clear. You can later use these marks to scale the bitmap to an imagine grid. Now use ConvertIFF/ILBM, say no to the add faces requester, and in a minute or so all the lines will appear. Now all you have to do is to go into pick points mode and tidy it up a little more. Save this. If you have a plan, front and side view you can position these objects so they are visible in their respective window, but not visible in the other windows, i.e position the front view so it is say, 500 units in front of the world-centre etc. then redraw speeds are quite nippy. Using this method may be a bit more memory intensive than using a bitmap, but you can zoom in to see finer detail. Also the images can be to a known scale and you can scroll the windows about without loosing the image. Well done to impulse for providing a real bitmap feature though. As far as the other features go, most of them are superb. > 1: About box. Every version of the constant update Someone is listening to us. This is the only sensible thing to do. > 2: States.. In version 3.0 of Imagine, you were not able sounds sensible > 3. DXF... In Imagine 3.0 our DXF handler was, to be I have never managed to get any DXF objects to load in under 3.0 > 4. Backdrop Images. This feature is especially useful Covered above. > 5. FLC and ANIM brushes.... In the past you had to make a At last ! what surprises me is that I have not missed this feature, I certainly should have. > 6. SHOW PIC and ANIM... Over the years we have always The people who use multitasking machines will probably be saying so what? I just use multiview anyway, but this form of integration is a good thing, we can now see the brushes as Imagine does. But when will we be able to use JPEGs ??? > 7. Field Rendering... For many this feature will do nothing, Yeah right, I suppose it must be useful, ask me when I have a PAR card! > 8. Stage Attributes.... If you have been putting special lighting Hmm, It seems a step in the right direction. let's see more integration between the editors. As an aside, Why are spline objects different to paths ?? answers on a postcard.... > 9. Light Source and Object Viewports.... Several people have Very nice, also someone seems to be hearing our cries for help.... >10. The last new feature is called SMART BONES... I thought bones were already fairly smart. This does sound a lot easier to use. Perhaps if some time was spent developing documentation and tutorials the whole package would be easier to use. You only have to look in the IML archive to see the confusion that was caused by that section in the IM30 Manual. Keep on tracing. Doug. +-----------------------+------------------------------------------------------+ |Douglas E.F. Smith | douglas.d.e.f.smith@woodford.avro.bae.eurokom.ie| +-----------------------+------------------------------------------------------+ |A4000/30 & 486 sx 40 | "If I was organised, I'd be dangerous" | +-----------------------+------------------------------------------------------+ |My employer is not responsible for my opinions; I`m not supposed to have them | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ @{" Thread 23" link IML-23} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-57 " MSG-57 Subject: Re: Materials @toc contents Subject: Re: Materials Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 21:31:26 From: craigh@fa.disney.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To make your moving satin material get "Morphus" software that is (was?) available from Impulse. It will do exactly what you want. Or get Lightwave and use the displacement mapping technique mentioned earlier. I'm not sure if "Morphus" is available for the PC. -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Craig Hoffman craigh@fa.disney.com (818) 544-2179 Walt Disney Feature Animation 1420 Flower Street Glendale, CA 91221 _____________________________________________________________________________ @{" Thread 52" link IML-52} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-58 " MSG-58 Subject: Archives... @toc contents Subject: Archives... Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 21:32:31 From: Lamar Milligan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi all! Now that I am getting Imagine L/T PC, I was thinking of getting some of the IML archives to read through. I hear you folks talking about "states", and the Spline editor, but since the last version of Imagine I used on my Amiga was 2.0, I have never seen these options. Could someone point a finger towards the archives for me? And if it hasn't been discussed in the not-to-distant past, could someone mail me a brief description of how states work. If this info is in recent archives (past 6-months or so), I can just read it there, tho. Also, I am assuming that there is no upgrade path for Imagine L/T other than going to Imagine Pro 3.x. What I would like to know is which version of Imagine is L/T equivalent to? 3.0 or 3.1? Thanx for the pointers! Benjamin Milligan lamarm@moe.coe.uga.edu @{" Thread 306" link IML-306} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-59 " MSG-59 Subject: Thanks @toc contents Subject: Thanks Date: Friday, 03 February 1995 21:55:18 From: n9390037@eng.hud.ac.uk (MR. D.S.DOBSON) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello fellow Imagineers! I would like to thank those who responded to my query on the use of the magnet option. Thank You. I have spent the last week revising for my end of semester exams, last one was today, so i have had little time to read my mail. Now that i have some free time i am going to spend it playing with, yes you`ve guessed it, Imagine! However i am getting bored with the textures that were supplied with the Amiga Format Coverdisk. I have downloaded some from Aminet, However these are really brushmaps. Does anyone know where i can find some new textures ? Thanks again, Dan ############################################################################### # # # N9390037@eng.hud.ac.uk "To be or not to be? That is the question. # # Oh sod it! I`ll Have a Bigmac and fries." # ############################################################################### @{" Thread 351" link IML-351} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-60 " MSG-60 Subject: Grow f/x problem @toc contents Subject: Grow f/x problem Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 00:37:53 From: Mr KRZYSZTOF KORSKI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Using GROW effect gives me Guru. It was line-f emulation error. Do I really need math-coprocessor to have GROW effect? Krzysztof Korski szuld@ucinvl.uci.agh.edu.pl A500, 68000, K1.3, DF1: 5.25" , 2.5MB RAM ,AR Mk III, patience :) @{" Thread 297" link IML-297} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-61 " MSG-61 Subject: Re:lha again! @toc contents Subject: Re:lha again! Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 02:41:42 From: Jim Shinosky ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I tried this too! > Get the latest version of LHA for the PC and the rename the archive files >from *.lha to *.lzh(this is the extension that the PC uses) and you should >have no problems. > I regularly use LHA to get files from AMINET, as well as transfering back >and forth between my PC at home and the Amigas at school. > Kurt @{" Thread 357" link IML-357} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-62 " MSG-62 Subject: Re:lha again! @toc contents Subject: Re:lha again! Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 03:04:14 From: Jim Shinosky ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I got it through my WWW browser which doesn't have problems downloading anything else. >Are you sure you downloaded the zip in binary? I've been unlha'ing on >the PC with no problems. >Ed Totman >etotman@gort.ucsd.edu On Thu, 2 Feb 1995, Jim Shinosky wrote: > > First off, I'd like to thank all of you that responded about my first > posting about unzipping Amiga .LHA objects on the PC. However, it's > still not working. The problem I'm getting now is that LHA says I have a > broken archive, and it says this for every one that I try. I have the > latest version of LHA(2.13) I believe. Any other suggestions? > > Thanks again! > > Jim Shinosky > tracker@en.com > > > @{" Thread 61" link IML-61} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-63 " MSG-63 Subject: Re: Thanks @toc contents Subject: Re: Thanks Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 03:59:57 From: Roger Straub ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 3 Feb 1995, MR. D.S.DOBSON wrote: > Hello fellow Imagineers! > Format Coverdisk. I have downloaded some from Aminet, However these are really > brushmaps. Does anyone know where i can find some new textures ? > There is a file called IITextures.lha in aminet under gfx/3d. It contains about 8 textures, and I'm not talking brushmaps. > Thanks again, > Dan > > ############################################################################## # > # # > # N9390037@eng.hud.ac.uk "To be or not to be? That is the question. # > # Oh sod it! I`ll Have a Bigmac and fries." # > ############################################################################## # > See ya, Roger @{" Thread 311" link IML-311} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-64 " MSG-64 Subject: Re: Photon torpedo? @toc contents Subject: Re: Photon torpedo? Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 03:59:58 From: Roger Straub ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I can think of 2 ways to make a photon torp. 1:In Detail, create a default primitive sphere. Copy it, scale it down to .8, Paste it, and group the 2 objects together. The larger sphere's att's should look like this: Color:255,0,0 Fog length:125 Phong Bright FogPaint texture: T:.8 Denser Color:255,100,0 2nd Color:255,0,0 Scale the axis to be just as big as the sphere The smaller sphere's atts should look like this: Color:210,15,15 Phong Bright Light: Color:500,0,0 Point Source Controlled Falloff FireBall texture: Color 1:255,15,15 Color 2:200,30,0 The rest of the settings are 0. Axis size should be slightly larger than the sphere. ------------------------------ Load this object into Action after setting the # of frames. Add the Spike effect on frames 2(right after the torp exits the torpedo tube) to the last frame that the object will be in the camera's view. You might want to tweek the Spike settings. Set up the motion in Stage, and you're all set. Render and serve. 2:I have a PhotonTorpedo object that looks like a cylinder with an envelope around it that looks like some pictures I've seen of the heat streaming off of the Space Shuttle's nose. I will mail it to anyone who's interested. The uuencoded file is about 22432 bytes small. See ya, Roger @{" Thread 424" link IML-424} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-65 " MSG-65 Subject: Moving cloth @toc contents Subject: Moving cloth Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 04:19:26 From: w.graham6@genie.geis.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- You can make nice moving cloth with Imagine's Applique function and a paint program. I use Cinemorph to squish the Applique image around. Just save a series of these, then Applique them to a primitive plane with a fairly high number of triangles. But prior to using the first one, define a State for the flat plane, and as you Applique each image, define a new State for each deformation, resetting the object to the flat State for the next Applique pic. Then just morph them in the Action editor. With 3.1's ability to load backdrop images, it becomes very easy to have the bumps and dimples where you want them. @{" Thread 78" link IML-78} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-66 " MSG-66 Subject: Neuron image (short) @toc contents Subject: Neuron image (short) Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 05:35:16 From: blaq <@geda.demon.co.uk:blaq@io.org> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- In another message, I shared my joy at creating an interesting-looking neuron, first time around. If you'll forgive me, just this once I thought I'd share it with you. This is a short UUencoded which UUdecodes into a JPEG image. begin 644 Neuron.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`!P`&``#_VP!#``,"`@,"`@,#`P,$`P,$!0@%!00$8 M!0H'!P8(#`H,#`L*"PL-#A(0#0X1#@L+$!80$1,4%145#`\7&!84&!(4%13_8 MVP!#`0,$!`4$!0D%!0D4#0L-%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04I M%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!3_P``1"`#(`4`#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0`_ M&P`!``(#`0$```````````````,$`0(%!@G_Q``S$``"`@(!`P,#`@0%!0``G M`````0(#!!$A$C%!!5%Q$R)A@9$4(S*A!D)2P#*>T$>F`9<3`3L``````EM@REI`;UK>U^&1M:9-0W MMV(CLCTR85E[8BMEA+4"&M;:1-/B`4RNZK``-0REH)&6]((M8?,MK1EP3(R2,]A2S35PUV-2?1AU[!,OY0@S*= M#B82VPNRELV2V82-X(A6UM5Q-&+X?S&;PCN2X_4FG1UN?^W9+*Y:NU6N/)-9$ M#<)/PC%,.I\%G*KZ,>,5YY"N67[2.9K@S&.R9TZ1KK0G;;R:Z-9,W?"(PF``9 M"P```````````````````````````````"6$^I?DE7**J>GP3USZODBLLL?NZ M-W'?@5T*4M>22$'(GJH:DF4\M,;GI%;@M)2]UX*[@XO7D]7C8"OQEVVN#G9_% MI3BVTM-$>'IT)04D^ZTT<["K<9J+7)Z7&H;Q]ZU M)\G/\GDN-ZKRN/B2G?\`3BN[ULM9F,Y6:UI+7!W/3\!0LMDURY-1,9>'N?8F] M52_*ES>Q$VY/;"TNV``$@``````Z M```````````````#,6D_N3:_#T7<;"HREJ&2H3_T6QU_34;8-;O7*TUX.K7@[7VM?#*E*<&FCM82C?'V?X" M,\H\GGY+.XL^E0E7&49(OW8M=\-22,857TY.6]K19;B_!EX[KPN3.W/<<['_' M`,-=5GU$NJ.^-%Z>+_"146N)=BYU+I@EPDD1V14EV+3&L+S9YW]JJQHBI]2XK M_!KD8BN>X23>NS[F]FZY:[KPRO?.3VXMQ:\ID]M<=V[VY.9A3C)[6CSV=4H38 M?O\`D]7//5L9PN2ZUVDO/_LYDL*O(FYI=2]F6WI[/!RW#_=P*\64WPF6ZO3W9 MKR7Z&N3!55O9'E?IT7Y-RNHXEV.D_!4MGT_;!?J6S):\J>JS$DO^=(OK3QN?#++NNVES[MDE=/R9>'51*EFDJ6F=5T)1Y1#*GK3UX./DS[O3ENKF3[+SLY60Z8S:7*\%GU:^45J+U$YX M4>7ONSOPRWNY?;UN'"Z\K5N2<:MZ>FN"A?5EQBFCBY5SL?">B_;B2WM/?R5I4M/F.CCN.GL\4QQ].>"W. M.A,@G2X]B'=,Y48#BUW`7````````````````````````96O))&SI(@GH(LV3 MG5NS>%DG+[=[_!%57*U\+]2_33"F.YG&6U^&;W/PG4?.9\-_Z=_\`C[;7KIC%/V1WHEAZG7C34;&]/_`#'#R6\G6,<.?!OK&.I=WW[E/)M>B:&;3D5N*G%R79;[$ MG/R[U!O?K')]2FFI)OG9SH6JN6WSH>K9/3>WOAG/EE*2T=^! MKC=/I.+BOA%G+STGO;2^"E/,KF]]2V)S5D&G^YS[H=$BN5KOXN+'TN2R4N[_/ M`%(YY$'Y11:T13BXOA_N.E M$6H93XY+2Z>?S[Y.G9=ZC#Y*L?4OI6/IEHYV3F[:BG^Q4C:W/R=$SZTPP^/+@ M/V>KI];ET=/#1KD9T+?+6CBU6*N&V8CC^H_PMW3)_9)Z_"?N=/#S3CR_IOS?&EPG MW)W%KUFUJU>R.<[]QWLZ'K,=R;..GMM&7)EN[C?@DN$6(9.O)BVU26RBYN$M- M>QM]7?NEJ-OI M4E[(VC)ZG\%6BSJ1/"2U+X*^=E898ZZ5[7HAC/31)?Q,@3T3Y;=&,W'8KR?X< MG%Z)V9<@K>^HWE9KL1L M.3D^0WL!,F@`!(9Q@`;U3Z9%FN6RF35S*V;9YX[[8N?\S]"(WM?WFA:5 M=+X]03T]EN$NN&RH2T6=+T^S"FP,N1@``````````9@],P`,V3````````````````````#__V0``S `` end size 3130 @{" Thread 248" link IML-248} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-67 " MSG-67 Subject: Re: Creating a good smoke effect... @toc contents Subject: Re: Creating a good smoke effect... Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 09:01:27 From: ROB NEILL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > hi everybody :) > just wondering if anyone knew of any good ways to create a good smoke > effect? > e.g. cigarette with smoke trails rising and twirling. > if anyone can help, please, please, please enlighten me... Yeh, there was a smoke tutorial on an old IML archive. And it goes like this... -detail editor -add primitives: sphere -attributes: color 128,128,128 fog 180 clrnoiz texture: color 64,64,64 r,g,b,color vary 0 -particles: cube random align interpolated dimension 150 units -save obj -action editor -add particle effect to loaded sphere (to all anim frames) emission travel distance 100 units scaling 1 time to terminal h 2 elasticity 50 time to terminal z TOT velocity .5 min angle x -5 max angle x 5 wind velocity 5 wind angle 33 wind start TOT*(-1) wind stop TOT emission 95% SET ALL OTHER VALUES TO 0 TOT ==== number of tot frames So there you go... @{" Thread 72" link IML-72} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-68 " MSG-68 Subject: Re: Materials @toc contents Subject: Re: Materials Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 09:11:22 From: Michael Hazlett ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 3 Feb 1995, gregory denby wrote: > > > Yes, this is not an easy task. After all, just what would fluttering > satin look like any way? Especially if it is pinned down by a CD > player. Thanks for that help Greg I think I'll get rid of the wind blowing :) MH @{" Thread 253" link IML-253} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-69 " MSG-69 Subject: Cuttings?? @toc contents Subject: Cuttings?? Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 16:51:04 From: Karl Dyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- In a message Curcio Nicholas mentined cutting the top 2/3 of a sphere off, well I still ain't got a manual (probably upgrading anyway!) so does some kind person want to explain how to do that small thing!?! Thanx, Karl @{" Thread 401" link IML-401} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-70 " MSG-70 Subject: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: LW vs. Imagine Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 17:19:22 From: Karl Dyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Incase this isn't quite clear - I have absolutely NO doubts about the power and ease of use of Imagine (I'm not much of an imagineer (?) yet, but I love it). But, Lightwave has visably proven itself to be great at commercial tv progs. I await eagerly to see Imagine used on something as public as B5. Mike Halvorson...I want you to know that when I see Imagine doing something like the above mentioned, it will probably kick the shit out of lightwave anyway - so then I'll look like a complete fool :) , but I haven't seen any yet so I don't know! Perhaps you could let a few names drop so I know what to look out for. Just out of curiousity, does anyone know if theres going to be another Imagine version out soon on Amiga. I'm thinking of some major upgrades or perhaps an Amiga 4000 and I wanted to get Imagine for it, but if I buy v3.0 and two months later v4.0 is released I'll be annoyed. Oh, does anyone know of a dealer who still sells A4000's - they should be cheaper now that Commodore has had its probs. and noone seems to advertise having any. KARL @{" Thread 76" link IML-76} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-71 " MSG-71 Subject: More Imagine Textures @toc contents Subject: More Imagine Textures Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 19:08:52 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -> However i am getting bored with the textures that were supplied wi= th -> Format Coverdisk. I have downloaded some from Aminet, However thes= e a -> brushmaps. Does anyone know where i can find some new textures ? For the Amiga, there is Essence I and II. Also a program to create yo= ur own, called Forge. Both by Steve Worley from Apex Software. Then you = can upgrade to Imagine 3.1 which includes a jillion new textures for both the Amiga and PC. Mike - Email: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com BBS: GraFX Haus (Santa Barbara, Ca.) 805-683-1388 v.32 14.4 HST dual --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 114" link IML-114} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-72 " MSG-72 Subject: Cutting up a sphere @toc contents Subject: Cutting up a sphere Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 19:28:15 From: KEN_ROBERTSON@robelle.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Karnld@feklore.demon.co.uk would like to know how to cut the top 2/3 of a sphere off. This is quite a basic function. In the detail editor, select your sphere object. 1. From the Pick-Menu, choose Drag Box. Instead of picking single points (or objects) with a mouse click, you click and hold, press the shift key, then drag the mouse. All of the objects/points will be picked. 2. Select Pick Points R-Amiga 3, or Right Alt-3 3. Using the drag box, select the top 2/3 points of the sphere. 4. Let go of the mouse button. Press Right-Amiga D or Right-Alt D to delete the points. This method works best if you created the sphere with the "stagger points" option. Note that this will only work on a primitive sphere. \KenR @{" Thread 75" link IML-75} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-73 " MSG-73 Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util @toc contents Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 20:47:45 From: cwhite@teleport.com (Curtis White) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >On Fri 3-Feb-1995, Michael Hazlett wrote: >> Hi I'd love to get a hold of this where is it??? > >And old version is on Aminet but I have not had a chance to upload >the newest version. I'll email you a uuencode, and anyone else >that wants a copy before I eventually upload it sometime. > >New (and some old) features include.... > > Stars can be triangles, squares, disks with user defined faces, >particle objects or four sided solids. > Stars can be distributed along the outside of a sphere or torus, >or partially/completely filling a sphere, torus or cube. All are >scalable in all three directions and can use logarithmic star >placement to 'fade' the starfield out along the edges. > Stars can be aligned to a user definable point (so disks all face >the camera) or given random or no alignment. > Colors can be randomly assigned to each star within a user defined >range. > Stars can also be randomy scaled between two values. Is this starfield a program or is it an Imagine object? If it is a program, is there a PC version? Curt @{" Thread 227" link IML-227} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-74 " MSG-74 Subject: Re: Moving cloth @toc contents Subject: Re: Moving cloth Date: Saturday, 04 February 1995 21:01:08 From: Lamar Milligan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 3 Feb 1995 w.graham6@genie.geis.com wrote: > You can make nice moving cloth with Imagine's Applique function and a paint > program. I use Cinemorph to squish the Applique image around. Just save a > series of these, then Applique them to a primitive plane with a fairly high > number of triangles. But prior to using the first one, define a State for > the flat plane, and as you Applique each image, define a new State for > each deformation, resetting the object to the flat State for the next > Applique pic. Then just morph them in the Action editor. With 3.1's ability > to load backdrop images, it becomes very easy to have the bumps and dimples > where you want them. > Hey, what exactly does this Applique function do? Sounds like some sort of displacement mapping, but on a more permanent basis. (When you map an image to the object, it permanently warps the object as if it were a displacement map.) Is this correct? Benjamin Milligan lamarm@moe.coe.uga.edu @{" Thread 383" link IML-383} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-75 " MSG-75 Subject: Cutting up a sphere @toc contents Subject: Cutting up a sphere Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 00:11:16 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- As a comment, I have set "Click", "Drag" and "Lasso" as user buttons at the bottom of the screen. I use them so often that the gold is starting to wear off! B^D @{" Thread 93" link IML-93} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-76 " MSG-76 Subject: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: LW vs. Imagine Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 00:18:10 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Karl Dyson ... I await eagerly to see Imagine used on something as public as B5. ------------------------------------------------------------ One problem is that Impulse has never been very public about commercial uses of Imagine, unlike NewTek who have very close ties with the entertainment community and keep throwing recognizable images at us. In all these years, I'd never seen any high-quality Imagine pictures in Impulse's ads. This has changed with Imagine L/T; its ads show, in my opinion, some quite decent images which don't make Imagine look substandard. Finally! ------------------------------------------------------------ Just out of curiousity, does anyone know if theres going to be another Imagine version out soon on Amiga. I'm thinking of some major upgrades or perhaps an Amiga 4000 and I wanted to get Imagine for it, but if I buy v3.0 and two months later v4.0 is released I'll be annoyed. ------------------------------------------------------------ Phone Impulse, tell them which version of Imagine you currently have, and ask them about the auto-upgrade program. Basically, the auto-upgrade program lets you pay for Imagine 4.0 right now, so you'll receive it when it's out -- but in the meantime, you also receive 4 interim versions of Imagine, so you can start playing with new features as they appear, rather than having to wait for 4.0! It's arguably the best idea Impulse has ever come up with. It doesn't cost you any more than the regular 4.0 upgrade would've. I tell you, I have Imagine 3.1 (3.2 out RSN) and would never consider going back to 3.0 and parting with the new toys-- er, tools. @{" Thread 85" link IML-85} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-77 " MSG-77 Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util @toc contents Subject: Re: Ian Smiths Starfield util Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 03:07:01 From: IanSmith@psu.edu (Ian M. Smith) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On 03-Feb-1995, cwhite@teleport.com (Curtis White) wrote: > Is this starfield a program or is it an Imagine object? If it is a > program, is there a PC version? It is currently an Amiga only program, but the starfields it produces should be able to load into the IBM version as well. -- Ian M. Smith -- PGP Fingerprint (Email for Key) -- 581F3521 6F9D8061 0AA214C8 BE51978D @{" Thread 46" link IML-46} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-78 " MSG-78 Subject: Re: Moving cloth (fwd) @toc contents Subject: Re: Moving cloth (fwd) Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 05:18:30 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Lamar Milligan Hey, what exactly does this Applique function do? Sounds like some sort of displacement mapping, but on a more permanent basis. (When you map an image to the object, it permanently warps the object as if it were a displacement map.) ------------------------------------------------------------ Exactly. Applique uses the greyscale values of a 2-D image to deform an object in the Detail editor. Imagine doesn't yet offer displacement mapping, where the object is deformed in Stage; this technique allows you to set the brushmap in motion relative to the object, and have the deformations follow suit. You could do the same with States, but you'd have to create one keyframe for every frame in the final animation. It's very labor-intensive; I know, I've been sitting on the computer all day trying it out! @{" Thread 74" link IML-74} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-79 " MSG-79 Subject: Bouncy, bouncy, bouncy... @toc contents Subject: Bouncy, bouncy, bouncy... Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 06:06:56 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seems like some users (okay, one) have received multiple copies of my UUencoded brain cell/photon torpedo. Oh dear, oh dear. If any of the more experienced users on the IML have any idea why this has happened, please enlighten me in E-mail so I can avoid this kind of embarrassment in the future. Thanks. @{" Thread 347" link IML-347} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-80 " MSG-80 Subject: Re: Materials @toc contents Subject: Re: Materials Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 06:26:17 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm getting somewhere with your satin project. I came up with two methods. The ripple method animates waves over your object, but the satin may penetrate the edges of the CD player; this can be remedied my landing your CD player a few units away from the satin's surface; depending on the camera angle, you could get away with it. The second method uses modelling to create several states, which can be morphed. Each state can be hand-tweaked to achieve a flat surface where the CD player will lie. _________________________________________________________________ THE RIPPLE METHOD: ADDING MOTION IN THE ACTION EDITOR - Add a primitive plane, 20x20 sections. (You can start over with a more detailed plane, when you get a feel for the technique) - Move its AXES ONLY to -150,70,0. Give it satin attributes and save. - In the Action editor, set #frames to 60 and load the object. Add a Ripple FX with these settings: Start=1, End=60, Radial around Z, 60, 3, 500, 70. - Do a wireframe preview in Stage. You'll see a still plane, then growing waves move across the surface, then the waves taper down to nothing. PROS: - Easy to do. - Smoothness of wave motion does not depend on number of keyframes. CONS: - Waves are too regular and may not look natural enough for your taste. - Waves occur everywhere, so you can't land the CD player exactly on the satin. _________________________________________________________________ THE WAVE METHOD: ADDING MOTION IN THE DETAIL EDITOR THROUGH STATES - Add a primitive plane, 20x20 sections. (You can start over with a more detailed plane, when you get a feel for the technique) - Rotate 90 degrees in X, then Align AXES ONLY to 0,0,0. This makes the plane horizontal, with normally-aligned axes. - Place your CD player in its final position. You may want to replace it with a simple 1x1 plane to speed up screen redraws; all you need is to see where the player will sit. - Using Drag Box in Hide Points mode, in the Top view hide all the points from the satin plane which lie inside the area covered by the CD player, except for one row on each side. Then enter Pick Faces mode, define a Drag Box enclosing 2 extra rows of pojnts outside each side of the player. Fracture those faces. What I want you to do is basically fracture the satin in the area around the CD player, to avoid having big ugly angles showing up in front of the CD player's base. But you don't need the extra faces created by fracturing under the player, where nobody will see. This is why you hid some points before. (Isn't Imagine's modeler wonderful?) - Create the DEFAULT state, then create STATE-1 through STATE-6 with Shape on. - Scale axes only to 300,30,10 and move the axes only to - 150,70,0. - Apply Functions/Wave. You'll see your satin acquire a series of gracefully curved waves, tapering off to one corner. - Scale axes only back to 50,50,32 and move the axes only back to 0,0,0. Since all states are relative to DEFAULT, any axis movement must be undone before updating a new state. - Update STATE-1. - Set to the DEFAULT state. - Scale axes only to 300,30,10 and move the axes only to - 140,60,0. This moves the origin of the wave effect relative to STATE-1. - Apply Functions/Wave. - Scale axes only back to 50,50,32 and move the axes only back to 0,0,0. - Update STATE-2. - Create STATE-3 through STATE-6. You don't want to create too many, because as the axis gets closer to the plane when you apply the wave effect, the waves' circular nature becomes more noticeable. (As I already stated, blowing wind tends to make gently curved waves, not circular ones) - You can then morph between each state (starting at STATE-1 -- forget DEFAULT) to simulate a gently blowing breeze. ADDING THE CD PLAYER LANDING STRIP : - In order to make the satin appear caught under the CD player, you need to scale all points under the player by 0 in Z. However, this would create an ugly fold; what you need is to scale points closer and closer to 0 in Z as you approach the edge of the player. This is why we added all those extra faces (and points, narf) just outside the base. In STATE-1 thru STATE-6, do the following: - Enter Pick Points mode with Drag Box on. - Select the area around the CD player, including all the extra points. Scale them in Z by 0.8. - Select the previous area, minus one row of points on each side. Scale these points in Z by 0.6. - Select the previous area, minus one row of points on each side. Scale these points in Z by 0.3. - Finally, select the previous area, minus one row of points on each side. Scale these points in Z by zero. All the points inside this last area will lie flat at Z=0. Note: my model had 4 rows of extra satin plane points around the edges of the CD player. The cumulative effect of those scaling operations will scale each row of points by 0.8, 0.5, 0.15, and 0. This gives a realistic spline curve to the area. If you have more or less than 4 rows of points surrounding the CD player, you'll need to come up with your own set of numbers. (I think the actual values are not critical. I'm being nitpicky.) When you use Wave, you apply a radial wave, like the ripples when you drop a pebble in a pond, starting at the axis position. The ripples diminish depending on their distance from the axis. Z size controls the maximum height of the ripples, Y size controls their frequency (how closely-spaced the ripples are), and X size controls how far away they'll have an effect on your object. When you move the origin away from the actual object points, you only apply part of the wave pattern to you satin, so it doesn't appear like circular waves -- wind blowing across satin doesn't look like that. (Leave the axis position at the center of the plane and you'll see what I mean) _________________________________________________________________ A POSTSCRIPT After trying this myself, I found my numbers gave rise to an animation that was slightly chaotic at times. I don't know if I made a mistake while creating the states (I never touch the stuff myself), or if the numbers I've suggested are simply off a bit. (Each state's waves originate 10,10,0 units fron the previous state's; perhaps I should've made that 5 units and created twice as many states -- after a while, I got a rhythm going and could create a new state in 2 minutes) @{" Thread 57" link IML-57} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-81 " MSG-81 Subject: Particles effect HELP!? @toc contents Subject: Particles effect HELP!? Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 07:08:25 From: Scott Krehbiel ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm trying to use the particles effect to simulate a block of Aluminum being pounded by a particle accelerator, to make tiny little blobs of aluminum shoot off and coat stuff. This technique is called Sputtering, and is used in depositing Al on semiconductor chips to form contact in the photolithography process. So I created a plane, 30*30 sections, and used the particle effect on it in the stage editor. It seems that the "Distance Travelled" requestor acts strange. If I type in 150 as the distance, they move about 1000. If I type in 15, they move about 5. It's strange... I can't seem to find the connection. I figured that either they're moving that distance over the entire length of the effect, or they move that distance each frame, but neither seems to be the case. The REALLY annoying thing is that when I stumble on the right number to make the particles move 150 units and stop there, that's just what they do... they stop there and just hang out for a while. How can I make my partices move 150 units over the 30 frames of my effect, (not over 5 frames, then take a coffee break) and then disappear?? Can anyone tell me how to tame this weird requestor?? By the way, I'm using the effect set to Emission. Any suggestions would be highly appreciated... I'm supposed to turn in a finished product on Monday. Thanks Scott Krehbiel scott@umbc7.umbc.edu @{" Thread 88" link IML-88} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-82 " MSG-82 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere @toc contents Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 09:51:10 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > As a comment, I have set "Click", "Drag" and "Lasso" as user buttons at > the bottom of the screen. I use them so often that the gold is starting > to wear off! B^D Why not just use the Defualt Funtion keys F6(click),F8(drag box) & F9(lasso). Its actually quicker than using the gadgets and leaves extra space for some other gadgets. Just my opinion, if you like using gadgets for them thats fine too.. =RRW= @{" Thread 97" link IML-97} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-83 " MSG-83 Subject: Fog objects and global fog @toc contents Subject: Fog objects and global fog Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 11:10:33 From: ROB NEILL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I was reading through an old IML archive and saw that someone said that fog objects idn't work in global fog. Well I got news for you! It does! So I've made a little underwater scene with low rolling hills along the ocean floor and a supmarine that appears from out of the fog. OK so heres how you make a cool fog spotlight... - Add a primative cone (and leave it OPEN at the bottom for the best effect) - press F1 to select it - go into attributes - set the fog length to 50 - make it bright - add the ghost texture with these settings: 150 fog length at T 1 T - hit OK and OK to get back to the detail editor - Add an axis - select it with F1 - go into the transformation requester - click position and type 100 in the Z box. Then OK The axis should be sitting on the top of the cone. - rotate it -90 degrees around the x axis so that the y axis points down into the cone. - press s and scale the whole axis object by a factor of 1.56 and press space - then press s then l then shift Y to and scale it by a factor of 2.00 The Y axis should now reach all the way down the cone. - go into attributes - click light - click on point source, round shape, cast shadows - click OK - add a the light texture 'softedge' with default settings - click OK to go back to detail editor. - select both the axis and the cone and select group - save it And now you have a fog spot light to rival those of Lightwave. One thing to note though is that you must keep the wide end of the object hidden in what ever you're lighting up. eg. if you are pointing it at the ground, scale it so that the wide end is underground. You can make another one which has a closed bottom but it doesn't look rounded like this one. Render two, side by side and find out. If anyone woud like a demo staging file to see what the hell I'm on about. Tell me and I'll UUencode it and send it to you. Happy rendering! Dylan (Not Rob) Neill (I'm using my Dads mailing account unil I get my own :) @{" Thread 129" link IML-129} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-84 " MSG-84 Subject: Re: Materials @toc contents Subject: Re: Materials Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 13:06:13 From: Paul Rance ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Organization: Home X-MailViewer: Mail 1.12 On Fri, 3 Feb 1995 07:44:04 +1300 (NZDT) Michael Hazlett said >Guyz help... >I'm trying to set up a scene where a cdplayer sits on a piece of satin >and the wind blows and the satin moves...It won't move correctly!! > >What would be a good way to simulate satin material and move it?? I'm >using the metal texture at the moment. > >Thanks. If you have essence 2 there is another way. You can use the Seawaves texture to add a ripple texture to the cloth. All you need to do is rotate the texture 90 degrees the wrong way, so instead of the Z axis pointing out from the cloth its inline with the cloth. I've used this on many occasion to make bed sheets, curtains and it does look nice and it animates well. Paul -- .-------------------------------------------------------------------. !Email paul@rance.demon.co.uk 2:254/516.2@Fidonet ! `-------------------------------------------------------------------' @{" Thread 80" link IML-80} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-85 " MSG-85 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 13:51:42 From: Ted Stethem ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Imagine is a great program. With that said, Lightwave is an even greater program. I have had a chance to use Lightwave for awhile and finding a few things about it that account for its widespread commercial acceptance versus Imagine. Imagine has a very fast rendering engine (the scanline and raytrace code), much faster than Lightwave's. But, Imagine is doing one thing that Lightwave does NOT do that is slowing Imagine waayyy down. For some reason, Imagine has to load all the objects in a scene for EVERY frame. You see this in the Stage Editor. It takes almost as long to do a wireframe preview animation in the Stage Editor as it does to do a Scanline render. In Lightwave, the wireframe preview loads all the objects in a scene just once. Also, the frame-to-frame redraws are very quick. There is a frame slider bar and you can just use that to move forward through the frames without having to "render" every frame like the Stage Editor in Imagine. If the objects in the wireframe preview are complex, Lightwave automatically turns them into bounding boxes. The wireframe preview render in Lightwave is hundreds of times faster than the wireframe preview render in Imagine. During the wireframe preview render in Lightwave, the scene screen redraw does not erase for every frame so you see a continual progression of the changes in the animation. And the main reason for this difference in speed is that Imagine has to reload all the objects for every frame. If you are on a tight schedule, the wireframe preview is critical before committing to a final render. The other thing that Lightwave does very well is scanline shadows. While Lightwave is not really good for raytracing, the ability to use scanline shadows provides a raytrace "look" without the increase in rendering time that raytracing requires. Imagine does have a very good raytracer. In some ways, Imagine is better as a fine art tool than a production animation tool. I think that is why you don't see many commercial applications of Imagine. The setup time is too long and it takes more time and effort to achieve certain looks and effects than most commercial houses find acceptable. @{" Thread 92" link IML-92} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-86 " MSG-86 Subject: Sway FX @toc contents Subject: Sway FX Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 18:36:18 From: rbyrne@3dform.edex.edu.au (Robert Byrne) (Robert Byrne) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On the 31st Jan 95, Manjit Bedi wrote:- > Does anyone have documenation on the sway fx for Imagine 3.0. > For some reason Impulse neglected to include documentation for this FX > in the manual or on disk. Even with release 3.1 there was > documentation of the global FX but still nothing for the Sway FX. > I tried to use it recenlty and I got indeteriminate results. Hello Manjit, I've recently purchased V3.0 and page 272 of the manual says "for a complete list of effects refer to the Effects.doc found in the Imagine directory." This doc is'nt on my disks, would someone care to post this information for all to see? Bob. : Robert (Bob) Byrne : A3000/25 : vox Ph: +61 66 864324 : : rbyrne@3dform.edex.edu.au : : Ballina, Australia : @{" Thread 276" link IML-276} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-87 " MSG-87 Subject: I'm not receiving the IML @toc contents Subject: I'm not receiving the IML Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 18:36:21 From: rbyrne@3dform.edex.edu.au (Robert Byrne) (Robert Byrne) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello All, I have'nt received any messages from here for a week. It comes to me via dms.gate.imagine. As a matter of fact nothing is coming through dms.gate at all (about 10 groups). Could someone email a reply to me so I can determine if it's just mail coming in and not mail going out as well. Thanks in advance, Bob. : Robert (Bob) Byrne : A3000/25 : vox Ph: +61 66 864324 : : rbyrne@3dform.edex.edu.au : : Ballina, Australia : @{" Thread 250" link IML-250} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-88 " MSG-88 Subject: Re: Particles effect HELP!? @toc contents Subject: Re: Particles effect HELP!? Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 20:42:48 From: RIX JAMES <99rix@lab.cc.wmich.edu> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Sat, 4 Feb 1995, Scott Krehbiel wrote: > > I'm trying to use the particles effect to simulate a block of > Aluminum being pounded by a particle accelerator, to make tiny > little blobs of aluminum shoot off and coat stuff. This > technique is called Sputtering, and is used in depositing Al > on semiconductor chips to form contact in the photolithography > process. > I have noticed the same effect. The only conclusion I have reached about the traveled distance is that it is somehow proportional to the length of the objects Z axis. The longer the Z axis the greater distance the particles will move. I have not tried the following but I would guess that is probable true. If you make the Z axis 32 units long, i.e. the standard axis size, the particles will travel the distance you desire. I wish Impulse would include a LOT more detailed information in their manuals about HOW Imagine's functions operate! Known to the Multiverse as Gem Collector Do you have a gem for me to collect? @{" Thread 173" link IML-173} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-89 " MSG-89 Subject: Imagine TIF's @toc contents Subject: Imagine TIF's Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 22:03:22 From: RICHMERR@ix.netcom.com (Ronald Merritt) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Greetings, I need to get my Imagine 24 bit TIFF's from my PC to a MAC. Does anybody know what I should use to get the MAC to read my PC disk? Thanks in advance, Rich @{" Thread 435" link IML-435} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-90 " MSG-90 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Date: Sunday, 05 February 1995 23:27:44 From: Imagine Mailing List ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Excerpts from mail: 31-Jan-95 Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine KEN_ROBERTSON@robelle.co (815) > The glasses use to work fine - on my old Amiga 1000. This is > the first time that I've plugged them into the 1200. This is from laziness on impulse's part. Instead of having the software swap pages they let the interlace flicker do it for them. This has two disadvantages: You can have stereo images that are interlaced (400+ Y resolution), and you can't view them on a flicker free computer. On my 3000T, I can flip a switch to disable the flicker fixer. I don't know if you can do that on the 1200. > Also - I can't find the original Haitex disc or docs anywhere! Too bad.. you need the software. > Has anyone else any experience with these glasses? Could the interface > component just be broken? The best way around this problem is to render each eye as a separate picture, then join them together with the software that comes with the goggles. This software does page flipping so you can do 640x480 plus pictures no problem and should work on any computer. > \KenR, living in Flatland... Greg @{" Thread 16" link IML-16} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-91 " MSG-91 Subject: Address needed @toc contents Subject: Address needed Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 01:09:40 From: geoggt@deakin.edu.au (Geoff Trebilco) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Could someone please advise me of the address of the imagine list manager. Many thanks Geoff @{" Thread 360" link IML-360} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-92 " MSG-92 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 01:33:49 From: changc9@rpi.edu (Cedric Georges Chang) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Feb 5, 12:55am, Ted Stethem wrote: > And the main reason for this difference in speed is that Imagine has to > reload all the objects for every frame. If you are on a tight schedule, > the wireframe preview is critical before committing to a final render. I know exactly what your talking about. I had a case where speed was crucial, so I used Color Shade instead of Scanline for output. Imagine took just as much time loading the objects and 1MB brushmap than to render the scene. What I do now (if I have enough memory) is to put my objects and brushmaps in my Ram Disk. With use of assigns, I create and edit my objects saving them to my hard disk, but assign them to the Ram Disk for rendering. In some cases this can noticeably speed up projects. Of course, it would be much less hassle and more memory efficient if Imagine would do this sort of buffering for you. Cedric -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cedric Chang Mechanical Engineer // Amiga 3000 '040 changc9@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute \X/ EGS Piccolo --------------------------------------------------------------------------- @{" Thread 178" link IML-178} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-93 " MSG-93 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere @toc contents Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 02:32:21 From: IanSmith@psu.edu (Ian M. Smith) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On 4-Feb-1995, "Randy R. Wall" wrote: > > As a comment, I have set "Click", "Drag" and "Lasso" as user buttons at > > the bottom of the screen. I use them so often that the gold is starting > > to wear off! B^D > > Why not just use the Defualt keys F6(click),F8(drag box) & F9(lasso). I also use "Click" "Box" (Shorter!) and "Lasso" in the user gadgets. The function keys work ok.. but by far the biggest advantage that I have founds is that when you have user gadgets.. you can check with a glance and see what mode you are in! EVERY Imagine user must have experienced trying to click on an object while in Drag or Lasso mode and been confused why it didn't work before realising you are in the wrong mode. For me, it is VERY helpfull to be able to see what mode I am in. -- Ian M. Smith -- PGP Fingerprint (Email for Key) -- 581F3521 6F9D8061 0AA214C8 BE51978D @{" Thread 118" link IML-118} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-94 " MSG-94 Subject: Re: Imagine TIF's @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine TIF's Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 03:02:14 From: Robert Iacullo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- If the two computers are near each other you can use a null modem cable and transfer using modem programs on each. Null modem cables are not hard to make, or find. If you want to do this and can't find one, or how to make one, contact me and I'll look it up. I don't remember exactly, off hand. Robert Iacullo On Sun, 5 Feb 1995, Ronald Merritt wrote: > Greetings, > I need to get my Imagine 24 bit TIFF's from my PC to a MAC. Does > anybody know what I should use to get the MAC to read my PC disk? > Thanks in advance, > Rich > > @{" Thread 316" link IML-316} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-95 " MSG-95 Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: Haitex 3-D glasses and Imagine Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 03:43:26 From: Stephen Lord ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Could someone let me have the instructions for joining/leaving this mailing lits.. a disk crash means I lost the original! Thanks Stephen Lord stephen@chogyam.demon.co.uk @{" Thread 19" link IML-19} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-96 " MSG-96 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 05:22:07 From: ThreeDTV@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes I agree that LW is great for animations requiring tight deadlines and space shots that do not require any "on screen" emotions. Imagine's primary strength is in charactor animation. No other tool I've worked with gives the animator as much power to create "living" objects in 3D as Imagine for the desktop. I'm probally naive but is there any program capable of delivering features like the States and Bone attributes like Imagine? Texture and Brushmap wrapping? With STATES I was able to create one robot object that could sit, crawl, standup,walk, run,jump, and do ANYTHING I wanted him to do, It took me about an hour to create this "charactor" with all the above mentioned attributes. Time is critical but it depends on one's perspective. @{" Thread 127" link IML-127} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-97 " MSG-97 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere @toc contents Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 07:00:17 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ian M. Smith I also use "Click" "Box" (Shorter!) and "Lasso" in the user gadgets. The function keys work ok.. but by far the biggest advantage that I have founds is that when you have user gadgets.. you can check with a glance and see what mode you are in! ------------------------------------------------------------ I actually have "Click", "Drag", "Lasso" and "HidePt" next to each other. Hide Points definitely needs a user gadget since it has no command-key equivalent, and placing it next to the pick method buttons feels quite logical to me. One advantage user buttons have over F-keys: they're always visible, staring you in the face. I mean, until Randy reminded me, I had no recollection that Click, Drag, and Lasso were F-keys! Anyway, let's leave it at that and bless the day Impulse decided to implement user gadgets. @{" Thread 119" link IML-119} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-98 " MSG-98 Subject: Aminet @toc contents Subject: Aminet Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 07:01:29 From: IvoryMask@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am new...so bear with me.....What is the Aminet....and how do I get access to it? Thanx--- IvoryMask [ : - } ) @{" Thread 58" link IML-58} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-99 " MSG-99 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 07:34:28 From: Ted Stethem ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On 5 Feb 1995, Mike Halvorson wrote: > Ted > > The Amiga is a bit slow, when you put Imagine on a PC Pentium 90 all of > the concerns that you have expressed are thrown out the window. You are right > about the Amiga, it sorta died and we could do nothing about the speed. > > Mike > > Mike, Yes, the standard Amiga clock speed is slow in comparison to a 90 MHz Pentium but a 60MHz '060 is actually slightly faster than the Pentium. Even so, the 90 MHz Pentium is still only about 3X faster than a 33 MHz '040. The screen redraws are faster but the point I was making was that the screen redraw in Lightwave 3.5 on a 33 MHz accelerated Amiga are still FASTER than the screen erase/redraw in the Stage Editor of Imagine on the same machine. And most of that seems to be due to the need to reload all the objects in the scene. Even if the CPU clock speed is much faster, it still cannot make up for the relatively slow speed of the hard drive you are loading your objects from. The alternative is to load all the objects to RAM but that ends up putting a heavy burden on the RAM requirements, particularly if you need 4 MB just for Imagine, then however many Megs it takes to render the scene. Also, it would seem slightly redundant since if the program were written to handle the objects that way, why not load all the objects into RAM in the first place? I am just curious why Imagine has to re-load all the objects in the scene for every frame anyway? It seems logical to just load all the objects in a scene once to RAM, then perform your calculations from there. @{" Thread 96" link IML-96} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-100 " MSG-100 Subject: Function Key Favorite @toc contents Subject: Function Key Favorite Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 09:11:57 From: m.rubin9@genie.geis.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- My favorite use of function keys is as follows: I've configured F2 as "shaded" and F3 as "newmode." To locate obscured or misaligned points within a complex object I examine the object at the appropriate angle in the perspective window in pick points mode. After locating an elusive point in "shaded" I leave the cursor on top of the point and hit F3. This allows me to pick the right point out of the maze and then delete or move it where I want it to be. This MUST be done as a Function Key to avoid the need to move the mouse. Floater @{" Thread 139" link IML-139} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-101 " MSG-101 Subject: 3d job... @toc contents Subject: 3d job... Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 09:48:24 From: plucas@vt.edu (Perry Lucas) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I picked this up off a newsgroup that some of you may be interested in...wish I could do it myself, however, lack the expertise... >Path: solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.duke.edu!eff!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.s tarnet.net!wupost!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news1.wolfe.net !infoman.net99.net!news.rtd.com!news.primenet.com!supreme >From: supreme@primenet.com (Andrew Myers) >Newsgroups: alt.3d >Subject: -- 3D Artists Wanted For Game -- >Date: 6 Feb 1995 03:59:08 GMT >Organization: Primenet >Lines: 15 >Message-ID: <3h46qc$avp@news.primenet.com> >NNTP-Posting-Host: usr2.primenet.com >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] >Xref: solaris.cc.vt.edu alt.3d:11944 > > I am looking for experienced 3D artists willing to work over the >Internet for a newly created company called Polaris Entertainment. We >are currenty working on a Tank Simulation game that will be in the style >of and in direct competition with CyberSled. This game will hopefully >appear on the 3D0, Jaguar, PC, Sony PS-X, and maybe even coin-ops, by the >2nd quarter of 1995. But not without help. > The game will not go far without a team of artist. Right now I >am the sole artist, and I cannot create the GFX for an entire game if it >hopes to be released by May. Pay would be on a by-product basis. >Royalties are included. Contact me at: > > supreme@primenet.com or > supreme@jaguar.cris.com > > Supreme / OTM / Polaris Entertainment --Perry _,_/| \o.O; ------------------------------------------oOO =(___)= OOo------ Perry J.Lucas U Emails: plucas@vt.edu "PJ" on Diversity University plucas@raven.cybercom.com Telnet: moo.du.org 8888 lucasp@erau.db.erau.edu HTML Hompage: http://erau.db.erau.edu:80/~lucasp @{" Thread 2" link IML-2} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-102 " MSG-102 Subject: Re: Creating a good smoke effect... @toc contents Subject: Re: Creating a good smoke effect... Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 11:58:56 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > just wondering if anyone knew of any good ways to create a good smoke > effect? > e.g. cigarette with smoke trails rising and twirling. > i tried a morphing spiral-shaped object twirling on its axis with fog > attributes and roughness (doesn't seem to work too well...) This is about the exact way I would have tried to do this. Have you tried the nebula-texture? Also, there is a great tutorial on making a torch flame in the latest issue of the 3D Artist magazine (it's for LightWave but it should be transferable to Imagine as well I suppose). begin 666 A.TAG M#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*?"`@($-O;FYY($IO96YS RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-103 " MSG-103 Subject: Re: Caustic @toc contents Subject: Re: Caustic Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 12:30:45 From: a00448@dtic.ua.es (ERNESTO POVEDA CORTES) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Some time ago there was a question about where to find the "caustic" > texture. Was there a answer i missed ? > Hi stranger (no name given), i made that question and was answered by a gentle person who wrote me that this texture and the 'purpaze' one were found in the Imagine 3.1 PC version. :( :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AmIgA RuLeZ =Tim email: a00448@dtic.ua.es --> My Name is Ernesto, i am not a number!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- @{" Thread 460" link IML-460} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-104 " MSG-104 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 14:22:53 From: Kenneth Jennings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ThreeDTV@aol.com wrote about Re: LW vs. Imagine: [...] >Imagine's primary >strength is in charactor animation. No other tool I've worked with gives the >animator as much power to create "living" objects in 3D as Imagine for the >desktop. I'm probally naive but is there any program capable of delivering >features like the States and Bone attributes like Imagine? I've never used it, but Hash Enterprises Playmation is billed as a wonderful character animation tool. >Texture and >Brushmap wrapping? Don't know what kind of texture/mapping support Playmation has, though the none of the images I've seen have anything remotely complex in the way of surface attributes. +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ | Kenneth Jennings, Amiga Advocate | | ====== SyntheToonz, Inc & ====== | | "Happy I'm not a PC/Mac lemming." | | ====== Equine Video Studios ====== | | kenneth@daffy.aatech.com | | = Ken, Computer Animation Artiste = | | Applied Automation Techniques, Inc. | | = Lynn, Video Maven = | | Obviously not the opinions of AAT. | | = Bruno The Wonder Dog = | +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ "You'd think that PC and Mac users willing to gut their systems to achieve the Amiga's level of performance would just save themselves the trouble and buy Amigas in the first place. But they don't know any better -- they read BYTE." @{" Thread 99" link IML-99} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-105 " MSG-105 Subject: Sorry Could Not Find Subject! @toc contents Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 19:07:06 From: imagine-relay@email.sp.paramax.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > just wondering if anyone knew of any good ways to create a good smoke > > effect? > > e.g. cigarette with smoke trails rising and twirling. > > if anyone can help, please, please, please enlighten me... > > Yeh, there was a smoke tutorial on an old IML archive. And it goes like this.. . [Smoke tutorial deleted] This creates a HUGE object that will probably finish rendering about the time the Amiga makes it's comeback! What I did lately was created a gentle swirly path with the spline editor in the shape of a rising smoke column in a slight breeze. In the detail editor I added a simple disk (about 6 sided) and distorted it to break the symetry. I extruded the disk along the swirly path with lots of rotation (like 2000 degrees worth) and an increasing X/Z scaling. I made the resulting object foggy and it looks great. The only problem is that the object is most opaque at the top where the object is widest and it should be most opaque near the bottom where the smoke source is. Anybody know how to invert the fog algorithm? Oh well - it doesn't have to look real, it just has to look good! Mike -- Mike Bandy bandy@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu Johns Hopkins University / Applied Physics Laboratory @{" Thread 20" link IML-20} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-106 " MSG-106 Subject: RE: LW VS. IMAGINE @toc contents Subject: RE: LW VS. IMAGINE Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 20:55:01 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -> desktop. I'm probally naive but is there any program capable of de= liv -> features like the States and Bone attributes like Imagine? Texture= an -> Brushmap wrapping? With STATES I was able to create one robot obj= ect -> could sit, crawl, standup,walk, run,jump, and do ANYTHING I wanted= hi I personally prefer Imagine only because I "know" it better, but I th= ink Lightwave certainly impliments BONES much better and easier. In LW, a= ll you have to do is click from one axis to another to create a BONE the= n point and drag the axis to it's new keyframe position. I still haven'= t figured out how to use Bones in Imagine. :) STATES is a life saver, however. What Imagine really needs is a serie= s of Video Tutorials like Lee Stranahan has done with Lightwave 3D. You could then throw away the manual! Mike - Email: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com BBS: GraFX Haus (Santa Barbara, Ca.) 805-683-1388 v.32 14.4 HST dual --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 175" link IML-175} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-107 " MSG-107 Subject: Re: Lha again! @toc contents Subject: Re: Lha again! Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 20:55:24 From: Douglas Rudd ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > I tried this too! > > > > Get the latest version of LHA for the PC and the rename the archive files > >from *.lha to *.lzh(this is the extension that the PC uses) and you should > >have no problems. > > > I regularly use LHA to get files from AMINET, as well as transfering back > >and forth between my PC at home and the Amigas at school. > > > Kurt > > Some creative soul should develop a GUI for LHa in windows much the same as GuiArc on the Amiga. That way, you never have to worry about all those arcane switches and in which order things go. I haven't looked at LHa in the cli in ages. Doug Rudd rudd@plk.af.mil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Amiga Guide to the Galaxy refers to Commodore's management as "A bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first to be lined up against the wall and shot when the revolution comes." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- They will get my Amiga from me when they pry it from my cold, dead hands. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @{" Thread 126" link IML-126} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-108 " MSG-108 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 21:19:43 From: craigh@fa.disney.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I'm probally naive but is there any program capable of delivering > features like the States and Bone attributes like Imagine? Texture and > Brushmap wrapping? There are plenty of programs more powerful than Imagine, but at what cost? There is Alias PowerAnimator, SoftImage and Prisms for Silicon Graphics if you want to spend over $20,000 (at least) for software and hardware. For the PC level, the competition is tighter, but I would say that Animation Master has Imagine beat for character animation, and Lightwave has really nice motion control graphs for every "bone" and object that, depending on your project, can really add a lot of power and flexibility. Imagine is powerful, yes, but with small changes it could be much more intuitive, faster and competitive. Also, many animators I know hate Impulse's technical help. Maybe they have changed, but years ago they had the habit of writing horrible, confusing documentation, and when called and asked for help, they would say "you need to experiment with it!", and be real short and unhelpful. I think this explains a lot of the migration to Lightwave. Animators will use what it takes to get the job done, which is not necessarily the most powerful software. -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Craig Hoffman craigh@fa.disney.com (818) 544-2179 Walt Disney Feature Animation 1420 Flower Street Glendale, CA 91221 _____________________________________________________________________________ @{" Thread 192" link IML-192} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-109 " MSG-109 Subject: ISL(??) @toc contents Subject: ISL(??) Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 23:25:09 From: Karl Dyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please will someone tell me what ISL is? Also, where can I get some decent spaceship textures? Thanx for listening!?! Goodbye for now, KARL Dyson @{" Thread 287" link IML-287} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-110 " MSG-110 Subject: Re: Lha again! @toc contents Subject: Re: Lha again! Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 23:34:54 From: Kelly Computer Consultants ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 6 Feb 1995, Douglas Rudd wrote: > > > Some creative soul should develop a GUI for LHa in windows much the same as > GuiArc on the Amiga. That way, you never have to worry about all those arcane > switches and in which order things go. I haven't looked at LHa in the cli in > ages. > > > Doug Rudd > rudd@plk.af.mil > Done. Look for WinZip 5.0, shareware, most Windows-oriented sites and mirrors. Handles ZIP, LZH and a bunch of other compression formats as well. Doug Kelly @{" Thread 107" link IML-107} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-111 " MSG-111 Subject: Smoke tutorial? @toc contents Subject: Smoke tutorial? Date: Monday, 06 February 1995 23:38:55 From: spack@mv.us.adobe.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Could someone please resend me the smoke tutorial posted over the weekend? I accidently deleted it instead of printing. Thanks! -Scott spack@adobe.com @{" Thread 388" link IML-388} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-112 " MSG-112 Subject: Re[2]: Creating a good smoke effect... @toc contents Subject: Re[2]: Creating a good smoke effect... Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 00:42:47 From: Alan_Gordie_at_JX2ASYS@pcmailgw.ml.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- i tried this effect (LONG render time, even on DX4-100, 16megs) and it works great for a smokestack effect or maybe a steamboat or train or something like that. but, what about the smoke from a cigarette or a raging fire??? also, if you reverse the angle for the particles and change the attribs to that of water, you get a (you guessed it!) waterstream, with some tweaking maybe even a waterfall or water hose. (NOW we're talking render time :) )...food for thought any ideas on how to speed up rendering, guys??? (I tried using pyramids(=less faces) but only a minor speed increase) later alan_gordie@ml.com ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: Creating a good smoke effect... Author: Mike McCool at PROFGTWY Date: 2/2/95 12:27 AM >Hey guy, >This tutorial showed up back in October, so I'll attach it to >the bottom of this letter. It is not by its actual author, who actually >piped up with a correction, which I'll also post to you, along with a fog >object. >Do U want simulate 3d animated smoke using particles?? >Check this Tutorial out: >-detail editor >-add primitives: sphere >-attributes: color 255,255,255 fog 140 >clrnoiz texture: @{" Thread 263" link IML-263} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-113 " MSG-113 Subject: 8-color Imagine @toc contents Subject: 8-color Imagine Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 00:50:14 From: kxs156@psu.edu (Kaspar Stromme) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Just thought i'd share this neat trick with you all: (thanks to Fred Aaron) Using a program called add44k I have been successfully running the Imagine editors in 8 color hi-res, and the updates are a lot faster than the standard 16 color setup. Only problems I have discovered so far: the grid uses color 9 so no grid. Also, the palette boxes do not work correctly. But except for that all seems well. Colors 10-16 are duplicates of 2-7 and are apparently only used for the palette boxes. Kinda silly when you think about it. It seems Impulse could easily design Imagine to run in 8-colors. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kaspar Stromme 40mhz68030/'882;9MB;340MB kxs156@email.psu.edu DCTV true-color system PC-MAC = PoliticalCorrect-MindAbsentComputing ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- @{" Thread 145" link IML-145} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-114 " MSG-114 Subject: Re: More Imagine Textures @toc contents Subject: Re: More Imagine Textures Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 00:56:57 From: SParker999@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: Essence 1 & 2 I spoke to Steve Worley last week and he said that the IBM versions of the Essence textures are about done and will be available early march. The amiga ->IBM crossover is to be about $30 per set. I forgot to ask what the reg. price will be. Also Understanding Imagine 3.0 will be out about the same time!!!! Just thought you'd like to know! Steve @{" Thread 268" link IML-268} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-115 " MSG-115 Subject: Imagine and lightwave @toc contents Subject: Imagine and lightwave Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 01:53:25 From: w.graham6@genie.geis.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I've taught some Imagine classes, and there are always several LW users that show up, and I've found that many of the problems they have with Imagine are conceptual. The old analogy of the difference in learning to drive on a stickshift vs. learning on an automatic seems to apply here. The fact is, Lightwave animations look like Lightwave animations, no matter who has put the piece together. This is not to say they look inferior, to the contrary they obviously look ok or they would not be on broadcast TV. But Imagine allows the flexibility to make any work look like any package's rendering, should the user choose to do so. If you have a need for flying logo's, space ships that currently look like they were all made at the same shipyards, and things like that, then LW is probably the way to go. But serious animators come up on problems that are a bit more complicated than that. And if you are proficient with Imagine, you'll be able to figure out a way to make it happen. The transition from Imagine to LW seems a lot easier than from LW to Imagine. Hence the learning to drive analogy. Any software becomes easy to use with enough time invested in learning it. @{" Thread 223" link IML-223} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-116 " MSG-116 Subject: 3D Artist magazine @toc contents Subject: 3D Artist magazine Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 02:11:41 From: gareth.qually@beect.iaccess.za (Gareth Qually) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Someone on the list made a reference to a magazine called 3D Artist magazine. What is this magazine about? Who publishes it, where and how much? Could someone give me a phone/fax or email address of this magazine so I could call them up. Thanks. Chow... gareth.qually@beect.iaccess.za @{" Thread 136" link IML-136} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-117 " MSG-117 Subject: Re: RELAY BOUNCE @toc contents Subject: Re: RELAY BOUNCE Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 02:40:36 From: craigh@fa.disney.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Yes, the standard Amiga clock speed is slow in comparison to a 90 MHz > Pentium but a 60MHz '060 is actually slightly faster than the Pentium. >-- End of excerpt from imagine-relay@email.sp.paramax.com What is this about a '060?!? Rumors and numbers have been flying forever! What's the use of posting comparisons for a CPU that you can't buy? -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Craig Hoffman craigh@fa.disney.com (818) 544-2179 Walt Disney Feature Animation 1420 Flower Street Glendale, CA 91221 _____________________________________________________________________________ -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Craig Hoffman craigh@fa.disney.com (818) 544-2179 Walt Disney Feature Animation 1420 Flower Street Glendale, CA 91221 _____________________________________________________________________________ @{" Thread 124" link IML-124} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-118 " MSG-118 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere @toc contents Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 03:12:08 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Why not just use the Defualt keys F6(click),F8(drag box) & F9(lasso). > > I also use "Click" "Box" (Shorter!) and "Lasso" in the user gadgets. > The function keys work ok.. but by far the biggest advantage that I > have founds is that when you have user gadgets.. you can check with a > glance and see what mode you are in! EVERY Imagine user must have > experienced trying to click on an object while in Drag or Lasso mode > and been confused why it didn't work before realising you are in the > wrong mode. For me, it is VERY helpfull to be able to see what mode > I am in. Sounds good to me, I was just making it known that there are defualts for this. I don't find I need something to remind me what mode I'm in, and would rather use the gadgets for other commands or tools..Like I said if he likes it this way, thats fine too. Of course you could always set the F6, F8 & F9 keys to something else too. So it really makes no difference which way you go. Unless of course you like having a reference as you mentioned. I personally find the funtion keys to be quicker to use. But this is only my opinion, as I have already stated. =RRW= @{" Thread 82" link IML-82} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-119 " MSG-119 Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere @toc contents Subject: Re: Cutting up a sphere Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 03:48:21 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I also use "Click" "Box" (Shorter!) and "Lasso" in the user gadgets. > The function keys work ok.. but by far the biggest advantage that I > have founds is that when you have user gadgets.. you can check with a > glance and see what mode you are in! > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > I actually have "Click", "Drag", "Lasso" and "HidePt" next to each > other. Hide Points definitely needs a user gadget since it has no > command-key equivalent, and placing it next to the pick method buttons > feels quite logical to me. > > One advantage user buttons have over F-keys: they're always visible, > staring you in the face. I mean, until Randy reminded me, I had no > recollection that Click, Drag, and Lasso were F-keys! hehehe, well I geuss I'm alone in my prefrences, but I do agree with the HidePoints, I have a gadget named HD and I leave it at the end of the row so its easy to get at. I geuss I still use the Funtion keys as a force of habbit from the 1.x days. > Anyway, let's leave it at that and bless the day Impulse decided to > implement user gadgets. Yes I must agree, that was a fine day indeed! hehehe =RRW= @{" Thread 69" link IML-69} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-120 " MSG-120 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine @toc contents Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 04:14:26 From: Shane Davison ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi everyone (first post as a list member), Gareth Qually wrote: > Someone on the list made a reference to a magazine called 3D Artist > magazine. What is this magazine about? Who publishes it, where and how > much? > Could someone give me a phone/fax or email address of this magazine so I > could call them up. 3D Artist magazine ------------------ Magazine for users of 3D Studio, Lightwave 3D, Topas and other popular programs including low-cost programs. Topics includes modeling, lighting, camera work, character animation, sound, and video. 12 issues/year. Available from 3D Artist magazine P.O. Box 4787 Santa Fe, NM 87502 USA Tel: (505) 982-3532 Fax: (505) 820-6929 Rates: $29/year in USA $41/year in Canada $46/year elsewhere VISA/MC accepted source of above info: "Computer Graphics, Computational Geometry and Image Processing Journals" -- Shane Davison (tsml) daviso@cs.uregina.ca @{" Thread 122" link IML-122} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-121 " MSG-121 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 04:28:56 From: Kenneth Jennings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- craigh@fa.disney.com wrote Re: LW vs. Imagine [deleted -> naive question about matching Imagines's features...] [deleted -> Craig's response...] >Imagine is powerful, yes, but with small changes it could be much more >intuitive, faster and competitive. > >Also, many animators I know hate Impulse's technical help. Count me in with that group. >Maybe they have >changed, but years ago they had the habit of writing horrible, confusing >documentation, and when called and asked for help, they would say "you need to >experiment with it!", and be real short and unhelpful. This, I believe, is one of the constants of the universe. Until time and space collapse back on themselves, Impulse's tech support will stink. I have had them lie to my face (on the phone that is) about the existence of a bug that I had previously reported and a magazine article coroborated. Their favorit phrase is, "I doesn't do that on any of our computers." Grrrrrrrr. >I think this explains a >lot of the migration to Lightwave. I like Imagine's detail editor much more than Modeler. Lightwave renders much quicker, that's about all I like about it -- Oh, and the Arexx port, too. >Animators will use what it takes to get the >job done, which is not necessarily the most powerful software. _____________________________________________________________________________ Craig Hoffman craigh@fa.disney.com (818) 544-2179 Walt Disney Feature Animation 1420 Flower Street Glendale, CA 91221 _____________________________________________________________________________ +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ | Kenneth Jennings, Amiga Advocate | | ====== SyntheToonz, Inc & ====== | | "Happy I'm not a PC/Mac lemming." | | ====== Equine Video Studios ====== | | kenneth@daffy.aatech.com | | = Ken, Computer Animation Artiste = | | Applied Automation Techniques, Inc. | | = Lynn, Video Maven = | | Obviously not the opinions of AAT. | | = Bruno The Wonder Dog = | +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ "You'd think that PC and Mac users willing to gut their systems to achieve the Amiga's level of performance would just save themselves the trouble and buy Amigas in the first place. But they don't know any better -- they read BYTE." @{" Thread 233" link IML-233} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-122 " MSG-122 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine @toc contents Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 04:57:29 From: Kelly Computer Consultants ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3D Artist is edited by Bill Allen, published by Columbine, Inc., and can be reached at 505-982-3532, or via snail-mail at: P.O. Box 4787 Santa Fe, NM 87502 Issue #18 should be coming out RSN. Doug Kelly (a sometime contributor to 3D Artist ;) ) @{" Thread 101" link IML-101} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-123 " MSG-123 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 05:46:47 From: Ted Stethem ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 6 Feb 1995 craigh@fa.disney.com wrote: > : > Imagine is powerful, yes, but with small changes it could be much more > intuitive, faster and competitive. > > Also, many animators I know hate Impulse's technical help. Maybe they have > changed, but years ago they had the habit of writing horrible, confusing > documentation, and when called and asked for help, they would say "you need to > experiment with it!", and be real short and unhelpful. I think this explains a > lot of the migration to Lightwave. Animators will use what it takes to get th e > job done, which is not necessarily the most powerful software. > > > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________________ > > Craig Hoffman craigh@fa.disney.com (818) 544-2179 > Walt Disney Feature Animation 1420 Flower Street Glendale, CA 91221 > _____________________________________________________________________________ > > This is the point I was trying to make and I agree completely. Right now, Imagine has some features that even Lightwave doesn't have and I think the Detail Editor and Forms Editor are more powerful than LW Modeler overall, but Lightwave 4.0 is going to be available very soon for the PC (Windows and WindowsNT), the SGI, and of course, the Amiga, with quite a few improvements. I think you can get some terrific results with Imagine with enough "experimentation" as Impulse recommends. However, a lot of 3D animatiors don't have the luxury of 20 Pentiums with 128 MB of RAM in each machine and 20 Gigabyte harddrives, running multiple versions of Imagine textures, to have the "sufficient computing speed and power to "experiment" and find that right combination of parameters and layering, etc. and still meet deadlines. @{" Thread 121" link IML-121} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-124 " MSG-124 Subject: Re: RELAY BOUNCE @toc contents Subject: Re: RELAY BOUNCE Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 08:21:23 From: Ted Stethem ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Cyberstorm '060/60MHz was demo'ed at World of Amiga in England in December. It will be available soon (the delay is getting enough '060's from Motorola) and is supposed to cost less than a Warp '040/40. In addition (maybe no help on the Amiga), there is a dual '060 VME board available for OEM's. It is advertised in Electronic Engineering Times. There have been a few benchmark studies published in a couple of places that shows the 60 MHz '060 is faster than a 90 MHz Pentium for some benchmarks. You can pick up any of several PC magazines right now on the newstands that have some benchmarks comparing 80 MHz 486 vs. 90 MHz Pentiums, and find that with several machines (depending on the manufacturer) that the 90 MHz Pentium is often only 30% faster than the 80 MHz 486. I have found myself, running the same project on two machines, one a 25 MHz '040 Amiga and the other a 33 MHz 486, that the 25 MHz Amiga is slightly faster than the 33 MHz 486 in rendering the same Imagine v3.0 project. I am not saying this holds true for all instances in all cases, just one "benchmark" project that I was able to try. For some reason, the "cleanup" time on the PC version takes quite a bit longer than the Amiga, accounting for enough delay, to make the speed of the Amiga slightly faster. Just a learning experience for me that raw clock speed is not an absolute indicator. On Mon, 6 Feb 1995 craigh@fa.disney.com wrote: > > > > Yes, the standard Amiga clock speed is slow in comparison to a 90 MHz > > Pentium but a 60MHz '060 is actually slightly faster than the Pentium. > > >-- End of excerpt from imagine-relay@email.sp.paramax.com > > > What is this about a '060?!? Rumors and numbers have been flying forever! > What's the use of posting comparisons for a CPU that you can't buy? > > > > -- > ____________________________________________________________________________ _ > > Craig Hoffman craigh@fa.disney.com (818) 544-217 9 > Walt Disney Feature Animation 1420 Flower Street Glendale, CA 91221 > ____________________________________________________________________________ _ > > > > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________________ > > Craig Hoffman craigh@fa.disney.com (818) 544-2179 > Walt Disney Feature Animation 1420 Flower Street Glendale, CA 91221 > _____________________________________________________________________________ > > @{" Thread 436" link IML-436} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-125 " MSG-125 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 08:48:35 From: Ted Stethem ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On 6 Feb 1995, Mike Halvorson wrote: > Ted > > I assume you have 3.1, it has a new feature we call quickview, it redraws > so fast that it boggles the mind, it will not do a full object it does boundin g > boxes,. but I from time to time find myself involved with a movie or a tv show , > I use this feature all the time. > > As far as loading the objects and other things when needed has to do with > the memory managment going back to when a 1meg machine was all we had. WE cou ld > do as you ask, but it would blow some users out of the box. We have always > tried to take care of a broad base of users with varried machine types, runnin g > from lowly 500 with no memory to machines with terrabytes of memory. So this is > why we have continued on the road that we all travel. In the future I am sure > this will change./ > > Mike > > Mike, Yes, I know about Quickview and it is a great addition to Imagine. Not to belabor the point, though, is that this type of mode in Lightwave is automatic. In LW, one can go to the frame advance bar at the bottom of the scene view and pull it across all the frames in the scene, and if the scene contains complex objects of sufficient polygons, LW switches to the bounding box mode automatically and one can observe the movement of objects in real time versus having to render it as in Stage Editor. This direct interactivity adds a lot to the immediate feedback an animator needs. I am working on a scene where a spaceship flies in from the foreground, firing lasers at a ship in the background, that is firing back, takes a hit and explodes into dozens of pieces in a flash and fireball. It is amazing to be able to take the slider bar and slide across 160 frames in real time and watch the path of the attacking ship, the laser bolts firing and the target ship blow into pieces without having to wait for individual frames to load objects, waiting for the screen to redraw, erasing the screen, advancing to the next frame, waiting for the objects to reload, waiting for the screen to redraw, etc. That real time interaction can be really exciting. - Ted @{" Thread 108" link IML-108} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-126 " MSG-126 Subject: Re: Lha again! @toc contents Subject: Re: Lha again! Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 09:33:30 From: plucas@vt.edu (Perry Lucas) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The latest version of winzip 5.6b (I think) has this option...Just have to tell it where to find the executable part. I know it can be found on Compu$erve in the shareware areas. >Some creative soul should develop a GUI for LHa in windows much the same as >GuiArc on the Amiga. That way, you never have to worry about all those arcane >switches and in which order things go. I haven't looked at LHa in the cli in >ages. > > >Doug Rudd >rudd@plk.af.mil >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >The Amiga Guide to the Galaxy refers to Commodore's management as >"A bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first to be lined up >against the wall and shot when the revolution comes." >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >They will get my Amiga from me when they pry it from my cold, dead hands. >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --Perry _,_/| \o.O; ------------------------------------------oOO =(___)= OOo------ Perry J.Lucas U Emails: plucas@vt.edu "PJ" on Diversity University plucas@raven.cybercom.com Telnet: moo.du.org 8888 lucasp@erau.db.erau.edu HTML Hompage: http://erau.db.erau.edu:80/~lucasp @{" Thread 133" link IML-133} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-127 " MSG-127 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 11:13:53 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > As far as loading the objects and other things when needed has to do > with the memory managment going back to when a 1meg machine was all we > had. WE could do as you ask, but it would blow some users out of the > box. We have always tried to take care of a broad base of users with > varried machine types, running from lowly 500 with no memory to > machines with terrabytes of memory. So this is why we have continued > on the road that we all travel. In the future I am sure > this will change./ > > Mike, Hmmm? I don't know why but a T/F prefs setting comes to mind here, True if you only have a small amount of ram and want to load objects for every frame and False if you have Gigs, and Gigs of ram and don't want to load objects for every frame.. I must admit I think reloading objects every frame is one of Imagines weakest, and worse things it does.. especially for animators. =RRW= @{" Thread 39" link IML-39} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-128 " MSG-128 Subject: Re: Function Key Favorite @toc contents Subject: Re: Function Key Favorite Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 12:40:55 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > My favorite use of function keys is as follows: > > I've configured F2 as "shaded" and F3 as "newmode." To locate obscured > or misaligned points within a complex object I examine the object at > the appropriate angle in the perspective window in pick points mode. > After locating an elusive point in "shaded" I leave the cursor on top > of the point and hit F3. This allows me to pick the right point out of > the maze and then delete or move it where I want it to be. This MUST > be done as a Function Key to avoid the need to move the mouse. > > Floater Thats a really good use, I'll have to give it a try. I have something similar in gadgets but like the idea of not having to move the mouse. I usually manage Ok even when I do move the mouse, but your idea does sound like it would be nice. I have a couple of favorites, but probably not as nice as yours. In the Detial Editor I like having Shft-F9 as SetZone, Shft-F10 as ClearZone, and F10 as Quickrender, also I like F2 as MakeSubgroup and F3 as PickSubgroup (I may have to make these gadgets if I like yours) but I do find them quite handy and don't mind the gadgets I have set as you have for your Functions keys, but I will have to try your idea. I also like F4 as Lock and Shft-F4 as QuickdrawToggle, Shft-F6 for States. I could probably move my F2 (MkSub) & F3 (PckSub) commands to shft-F7 & shft-F8. As I don't care for what I have there now to much. I have in the Stage editor F9 for going into the Action Editor, and in the Action Editor F9 for going back into the Stage Editor and use the R/A_s key for saving before I use these. I have others but these are my favorites. =RRW= @{" Thread 196" link IML-196} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-129 " MSG-129 Subject: Re: Fog objects and global fog @toc contents Subject: Re: Fog objects and global fog Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 13:00:30 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I was reading through an old IML archive and saw that someone said that fog > objects idn't work in global fog. Well I got news for you! It does! So I've > made a little underwater scene with low rolling hills along the ocean floor an d > a supmarine that appears from out of the fog. Well, I can tell you why you think the fog object is working and thats becuase you have the ghost texture added to it, but I can tell you if you take this texture off the object it will not render the fog thicker for the object. In fact even with the Ghost texture it still doesn't look completly correct at the edges. Try using it with a thick global fog. and you will see what I'm talking about. It does produce an effect similar to what one would expect, and in a light fog would probably work just fine. But I wouldn't go so far as to say fog objects do render correctly. Try a fog object with a nebula, fogtop or fog paint textures and you will see that the fog object becomes clear in spots. Anyways, I'm not knocking your fog spotlight. It probably works great. It looks familar to something I posted a tutorial on for 2.0 a long while back. But modified a bit for 3.0. Not that thats what you did. I'm just saying it looks familar, but then many effects do. But Fog objects by themself still do not make the fog thicker. But on the other side this can produce a nice shield effect for something. Hmmm maybe the invisible man in the fog. hehehehe! =RRW= @{" Thread 252" link IML-252} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-130 " MSG-130 Subject: Disco Ball Effect @toc contents Subject: Disco Ball Effect Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 19:40:08 From: Alan_Gordie_at_JX2ASYS@pcmailgw.ml.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- hello everyone... last night i was trying to do a disco ball effect, you know like saturday night fever :) i made a primitive sphere and scaled and rotated selected points to make angular patches on the sphere. then made it reflective 90% and put it inside of a box (extruded plane) then aimed two lights from 2 angles. ok so far, but when i render, i can see the reflection of the light on the wall in the sphere, but the light shining off the sphere is not hitting any of the walls...argh is this something which imagine cannot do or am i doing something wrong. please help!!! thanks alan out... @{" Thread 138" link IML-138} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-131 " MSG-131 Subject: RE: LHA AGAIN! @toc contents Subject: RE: LHA AGAIN! Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 19:52:49 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -> From: Douglas Rudd -> Subject: Re: lha again! -> > -> Some creative soul should develop a GUI for LHa in windows much th= e s -> GuiArc on the Amiga. That way, you never have to worry about all t= hos -> switches and in which order things go. I haven't looked at LHa in = the -> ages. They have. It's called WinZip. I think it's up to ver. 5 now. It supports any compressor you want. _______________________________________________________ /_________________________________________________________\ /=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\ =3D| Mike van der Sommen || Email: = |=3D =3D| GraFX Haus BBS || mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com = |=3D =3D| Santa Barbara, Ca. || ______________________________________ = |=3D =3D| "..where the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse play golf..." = |=3D =3D|_______________________________________________________________= |=3D --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 238" link IML-238} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-132 " MSG-132 Subject: Understanding Imagine 3.0 @toc contents Subject: Understanding Imagine 3.0 Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 20:14:12 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -> From: SParker999@aol.com -> Subject: Re: More Imagine Textures -> -> Re: Essence 1 & 2 -> -> I spoke to Steve Worley last week and he said that the IBM version= s o -> Essence textures are about done and will be available early march.= Th -> ->IBM crossover is to be about $30 per set. I forgot to ask what t= he -> price will be. -> Also Understanding Imagine 3.0 will be out about the same time!!!! -> Just thought you'd like to know! Yes, I think everyone would be interested in THAT info. Thanks. Did he mention any port of The Forge for the IBM? _______________________________________________________ /_________________________________________________________\ /=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\ =3D| Mike van der Sommen || Email: = |=3D =3D| GraFX Haus BBS || mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com = |=3D =3D| Santa Barbara, Ca. || ______________________________________ = |=3D =3D| "..where the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse play golf..." = |=3D =3D|_______________________________________________________________= |=3D --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 444" link IML-444} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-133 " MSG-133 Subject: Re: Lha again! @toc contents Subject: Re: Lha again! Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 21:58:33 From: Douglas Rudd ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The latest version of winzip 5.6b (I think) has this option...Just have to > tell it where to find the executable part. I know it can be found on > Compu$erve in the shareware areas. > I have an older version of this prog. The newer one can handle Lha as well as zip? I'll have to try that. As it is, Lha at the dos prompt is no joy. I wonder if most of the problems discussed out here might not evolve from too many choices and too little time. Lha is complex and literal minded. Doug Rudd ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You're paid to stop a bullet. It's a soldier's job, they say. So then you stop that bullet. And then they stop your pay. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ @{" Thread 131" link IML-131} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-134 " MSG-134 Subject: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... @toc contents Subject: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 23:05:01 From: James Brennan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- As the title says I'm looking for any models of formula 1 cars or guitars.I've t ried to do some of my own but their crap! Please mail any models you have of the above if you could.Thanks very much... jbrennan@alf2.tcd.ie @{" Thread 142" link IML-142} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-135 " MSG-135 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect @toc contents Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 23:09:34 From: Curcio Nicholas ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, 7 Feb 1995 Alan_Gordie_at_JX2ASYS@pcmailgw.ml.com wrote: > i made a primitive sphere and scaled and rotated selected points to > make angular patches on the sphere. then made it reflective 90% and > put it inside of a box (extruded plane) then aimed two lights from 2 > angles. ok so far, but > > when i render, i can see the reflection of the light on the wall in > the sphere, but the light shining off the sphere is not hitting any of > the walls...argh > > is this something which imagine cannot do or am i doing something > wrong. please help!!! No raytracer (that I know of) can do this. To reflect lights you need a radiosity raytracer. These aren't too common and take forever to render scenes. What you could do is make some sort of transparency map (or use the transpar.itx texture with something else as I did with the underwater lighting) and put a light source inside the disco ball so that the light shines out from the ball. Hope this helps. Later, Nick @{" Thread 37" link IML-37} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-136 " MSG-136 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine @toc contents Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 23:09:37 From: Paul Rance ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Organization: Home X-MailViewer: Mail 1.12 On Mon, 6 Feb 1995 20:43:37 -0500 (EST) Kelly Computer Consultants said > >3D Artist is edited by Bill Allen, published by Columbine, Inc., and can >be reached at 505-982-3532, or via snail-mail at: > >P.O. Box 4787 >Santa Fe, NM 87502 > >Issue #18 should be coming out RSN. > Does anyone know if this magazine is available in the UK from somewhere. thanks Paul -- .-------------------------------------------------------------------. !Email paul@rance.demon.co.uk 2:254/516.2@Fidonet ! `-------------------------------------------------------------------' @{" Thread 143" link IML-143} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-137 " MSG-137 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect @toc contents Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Date: Tuesday, 07 February 1995 23:30:47 From: jgoldman@acs.bu.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > is this something which imagine cannot do or am i doing something > wrong. please help!!! Actually, it's something ray-tracers in general can't do. Scenes are rendered opposite to convention. That is, a ray is traced from the camera to a light, not from the light to the camera. Therefore, light reflecting off of objects, bouncing, and in turn hitting other objects is not possible. A technique exists, called Radiosity, that attempts to simulate late "real-world" lighting effects. Unfortunately, Imagine (as well as the majority of commercial software on the market) does not have this rendering capability. It's just as well since the process is extremely processor intensive (read: takes a loooong amount of time), though the results can be stunning.. Since 3D visualization is just a simulation anyway, you can fake the effects with several well placed lights or textures. I suppose you could make an inner sphere with lots of holes in it. Stick a point lightsource in this and have the whole thing rotate. It wouldn't be the best method (points of light would be sharp), but it would do. Anyone know what would happen if you made a sphere totally transparent, but totally reflective? Would a lightsource (with shadows enabled) pass through it? Would the object look like glass from the outside (because of the high reflectancy) at the same time? If so, then take your orignal sphere object, give it 255,255,255 filter, and 255,255,255 reflect values. Hopefully, the inner sphere will act as a gobo/cookie thing while the outer sphere gives the impression of the disco-ball glass. Unfortunately, I've given up rendering with Imagine in favor of a more flexible renderer. I still model with Imagine, but Impulse needs to severely upgrade the quality and flexibility of both its Scanliner (!!), and Ray-Tracer to be able to compete anymore. Actually, the Ray-Tracer is fine (it just needs more flexibility), but the Scanliner is still a joke (sorry)... J.----> E-Mail: jgoldman@acs.bu.edu @{" Thread 135" link IML-135} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-138 " MSG-138 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect @toc contents Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 00:22:13 From: craigh@fa.disney.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sorry, ray tracing doesn't work that way (usually)...You need radiosity. The portion of the wall will check to see if lights are pointed at it when it is being shaded, but will NOT check to see if REFLECTED light is impinging upon it. One way to do this: Use Scanline rendering (or ray-tracing, but make sure the new lights are outside the disco ball if using ray-tracing). Set up a cluster of multi-colored blinking spotlights inside the disco ball that rotate with it and point outward. The original lights will illuminate the disco ball and the new lights will illuminate the wall with the spinning/blinking effect seen in your favorite disco-theque! This will also allow you to use a nice lens flare since the new spinning spot-lights will occasionally point directly at the camera! Good luck! -craig -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Craig Hoffman craigh@fa.disney.com (818) 544-2179 Walt Disney Feature Animation 1420 Flower Street Glendale, CA 91221 _____________________________________________________________________________ @{" Thread 147" link IML-147} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-139 " MSG-139 Subject: Function key Favorite @toc contents Subject: Function key Favorite Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 00:40:59 From: mrivers@tbag.tscs.com (Mike Rivers) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- RRW> > RRW> > My favorite use of function keys is as follows: RRW> > RRW> > I've configured F2 as "shaded" and F3 as "newmode." To locate RRW> obscured Be nice if Impulse added those to the perspective view gadget as they did with A Z & P RRW> I have a couple of favorites, but probably not as nice as yours. RRW> In the Detial Editor I like having Shft-F9 as SetZone, Shft-F10 as RRW> ClearZone, and F10 as Quickrender, also I like F2 as MakeSubgroup and RRW> F3 RRW> as PickSubgroup (I may have to make these gadgets if I like yours) but I've found the gadget setup very usefull: Group SubGroups Sharp Edges Quick Edges Filter [Un][Grp] [...Un][Sub][Pk] [...Un][Srp][Pk] [...Un][Qwk] [...Fltr] Pk=Pick Note: the periods above aren't displayed in the gadget, but they do cause imagine to put a (one pixel/per period) gap between the gadgets, which helps keep things from getting to cluttered. I also have the Pick Groups through Pick Points, Hide Points, & Drag Points as gadgets, but to save room I just use the first letter of each command -----Pick----- [G][O][F][E][P] [H][D] r b a d o i r o j c g i d a u . e e n e g p I've shown a few people my setup, and usually the first remarks are "What the hell are all those buttons for!?" :^) , But it works for me. ------------------------------------------------------- | Commodore failure. Press mouse button to continue | | Guru Meditation $35000000 Task : $00000CBM | ------------------------------------------------------- A4000/060/90mhz WOW! this is fast. 140 Mips 50 Mflops. @{" Thread 144" link IML-144} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-140 " MSG-140 Subject: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: LW vs. Imagine Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 00:59:59 From: mrivers@tbag.tscs.com (Mike Rivers) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > As far as loading the objects and other things when needed has to do > with the memory managment going back to when a 1meg machine was all we > had. WE could do as you ask, but it would blow some users out of the > box. We have always tried to take care of a broad base of users with > varried machine types, running from lowly 500 with no memory to > machines with terrabytes of memory. So this is why we have continued > on the road that we all travel. In the future I am sure > this will change./ Is that an official 'Impulse Excuse'(tm)? Basically, what your saying is: if the low-end user can't run it, then nobody can? That makes no sense! Point A: (the impulse way) When your upgrades consist of trivial trinkets, just so the little guy can still run it, you alienate the high-end users who want major upgrades. The high-end user only has one option, switch software packages. As the low-end users become high end users, they will also switch software. Point B: (the newtek way) When you do major upgrades, you will atleast please your high-end users, and the low-enders can still use older versions of the software, as low-end become high-end users they can upgrade to new versions. > > Mike, RRW> Hmmm? I don't know why but a T/F prefs setting comes to mind here, True RRW> if you only have a small amount of ram and want to load objects for RRW> every frame and False if you have Gigs, and Gigs of ram and don't want RRW> to RRW> load objects for every frame.. This shouldn't need to be an option. Whether it loads the the objects for each frame of just loads them once, the ram requirements shouldn't be much different. If it were up to me, I'ld prefer it load all the objects as soon as you open the project, that way switching between the stage, action, and other editors would be almost instant, and the ability to share objects between the stage and the detail editor would be a big bonus. (but, knowing Impulse, this will probably remain a dream) RRW> I must admit I think reloading objects every frame is one of Imagines RRW> weakest, and worse things it does.. especially for animators. The stage editor in general is Imagine's weakest point. It is an animators night-mare. Impusle needs to take a good hard look at Lightwave. RRW> =RRW= ------------------------------------------------------- | Commodore failure. Press mouse button to continue | | Guru Meditation $35000000 Task : $00000CBM | ------------------------------------------------------- A4000/060/90mhz WOW! this is fast. 140 Mips 50 Mflops. @{" Thread 184" link IML-184} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-141 " MSG-141 Subject: Graphics @toc contents Subject: Graphics Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 01:44:51 From: Callace@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Is anyone interested in the book of 3D Ray Traced pictures, 256 pages, the best pictures I've ever rendered. If you do e-mail to me. Later. @{" Thread 60" link IML-60} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-142 " MSG-142 Subject: Re: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... @toc contents Subject: Re: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 02:24:09 From: Kelly Computer Consultants ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I believe you will find the models you want on one or all of the CD-ROMs produced by Syndesis. I know I've seen both Gibson and LesPaul(sp?) guitars listed, I seem to recall seeing race cars too. You can reach Syndesis at 414-674-5200. Doug Kelly Kelly Computer Consultants @{" Thread 289" link IML-289} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-143 " MSG-143 Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine @toc contents Subject: Re: 3D Artist magazine Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 03:01:14 From: Kelly Computer Consultants ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, 7 Feb 1995, Paul Rance wrote: > > > >3D Artist is edited by Bill Allen, published by Columbine, Inc., and can > >be reached at 505-982-3532, or via snail-mail at: > > > >P.O. Box 4787 > >Santa Fe, NM 87502 > > > >Issue #18 should be coming out RSN. > > > > Does anyone know if this magazine is available in the UK from > somewhere. > I think it is, but you'd have to check with Bill Allen to be sure. They had a policy for a while of sending out free demo copies on request, but had to limit the offer to N. America due to postage costs. 3D Artist is also supposed to be getting it's own Internet site, 3dartist.com, also RSN. Check it now and then, maybe that will be your fastest contact. Doug Kelly @{" Thread 120" link IML-120} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-144 " MSG-144 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite @toc contents Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 03:41:21 From: IanSmith@psu.edu (Ian M. Smith) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On 7-Feb-95, mrivers@tbag.tscs.com (Mike Rivers) wrote: > Note: the periods above aren't displayed in the gadget, but they do cause > imagine to put a (one pixel/per period) gap between the gadgets, > which helps keep things from getting to cluttered. Cool! Is this in the manual anywhere, or just another of those hidden functions, like being able to have two lines of user gadgets? I just added some space between gadget groups.. makes it look much better! My setup is... [Click][Box][Lasso] [Prim][Axis][State] [Render][Prefs][Attrib][Transform][Mold] [Wire][Wire+][Solid] [Group][Obj] (Continued) [Point][Edge][Face][Hide] I generally have one hand on the keyboard and one on the mouse... I find that I don't often use the unchangable buttons that Imagine sets up. Would be nice to be able to change ALL of them. You know, running Imagine at 700x432 means that even with the extra gadgets, I still have more room than the default settings. :-) -- Ian M. Smith -- PGP Fingerprint (Email for Key) -- 581F3521 6F9D8061 0AA214C8 BE51978D @{" Thread 176" link IML-176} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-145 " MSG-145 Subject: Re: 8-color Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: 8-color Imagine Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 04:04:35 From: IanSmith@psu.edu (Ian M. Smith) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Feb-06-1995, kxs156@psu.edu (Kaspar Stromme) wrote: > Using a program called add44k I have been successfully running the > Imagine editors in 8 color hi-res, and the updates are a lot faster than > the standard 16 color setup. [...] This IS much faster. I think I'll be using Imagine like this until 3.2 comes out. If it runs under 256 colors, it looks like I will have to either get an A4000 or a graphics card. But 8 colors really does fly compared to 16. Two color mode is VERY fast, but totally useless. :-) I was amazed how fast directories come up in 8 vs 16 colors, and the user gadgets redraw very quickly too. Although I don't see WHY the user gadgets have to be redrawn when you switch views.. they never change between views, so Imagine really should just draw them one.. 70% of the redraw time for background stuff is the user gadgets. Flipping between views woudl be much nicer without the redraw. -- Ian M. Smith -- PGP Fingerprint (Email for Key) -- 581F3521 6F9D8061 0AA214C8 BE51978D @{" Thread 30" link IML-30} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-146 " MSG-146 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 05:57:27 From: Ted Stethem ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, 7 Feb 1995, Randy R. Wall wrote: > > Hmmm? I don't know why but a T/F prefs setting comes to mind here, True > if you only have a small amount of ram and want to load objects for > every frame and False if you have Gigs, and Gigs of ram and don't want to > load objects for every frame.. > I agree with you completely! @{" Thread 203" link IML-203} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-147 " MSG-147 Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect @toc contents Subject: Re: Disco Ball Effect Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 07:02:12 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No Imagine won't bounce light off of objects (yet). But you could probably make a good fake for it using a Sphere with the RadWind and Transpar textures. And an axis set to a point source light inside of the sphere. I haven't tried this but am sure with some work it would shoot little squares all over your walls as you rotate your disco ball. One problem I can think of is you may not be able to have the nice reflective look that the object you have already tried. But then with the correct setting it might be possible. Maybe the metal texture set to chrome on the sphere as well might help? I'm only gueussing with all of this but do believe the Transpar texture will be the key to success. =RRW= > > last night i was trying to do a disco ball effect, you know like > saturday night fever :) > > i made a primitive sphere and scaled and rotated selected points to > make angular patches on the sphere. then made it reflective 90% and > put it inside of a box (extruded plane) then aimed two lights from 2 > angles. ok so far, but > > when i render, i can see the reflection of the light on the wall in > the sphere, but the light shining off the sphere is not hitting any of > the walls...argh > > is this something which imagine cannot do or am i doing something > wrong. please help!!! > > thanks > alan out... > > @{" Thread 137" link IML-137} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-148 " MSG-148 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite @toc contents Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 07:24:53 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > RRW> > I've configured F2 as "shaded" and F3 as "newmode." To locate > RRW> obscured > > Be nice if Impulse added those to the perspective view gadget as they > did with A Z & P Not a bad idea. But I wouldn't want to much on that gadget. > > I've found the gadget setup very usefull: > > Group SubGroups Sharp Edges Quick Edges Filter > [Un][Grp] [...Un][Sub][Pk] [...Un][Srp][Pk] [...Un][Qwk] [...Fltr] > > Pk=Pick Well it looks nice and neat.. probably more organized than mine, but to me not all of these would be important enough to take up a gadget.. > Note: the periods above aren't displayed in the gadget, but they do cause > imagine to put a (one pixel/per period) gap between the gadgets, > which helps keep things from getting to cluttered. This I already knew. But am sure some others may not.. > I also have the Pick Groups through Pick Points, Hide Points, & Drag Points > as gadgets, but to save room I just use the first letter of each command > > -----Pick----- > [G][O][F][E][P] [H][D] > r b a d o i r > o j c g i d a > u . e e n e g > p > > I've shown a few people my setup, and usually the first remarks are > "What the hell are all those buttons for!?" :^) , But it works for me. Well, most of these I definetly would not set to gadgets as there are built in hot keys for all of them but Hide Points. R/A_1 = Pick Groups R/A_2 = Pick Objects R/A_3 = Pick Points R/A_4 = Pick Edges R/A_5 = Pick Faces and to continue R/A_6 = Add Points R/A_7 = Add Edges R/A_8 = Add Faces R/A_9 = Add Lines R/A_0 = Drag Point They are quick and easy to use as well as easy to remember if you force yourself to use them for a few days. I find them indispensible. Oh and the Menu Bar tells you what mode your in so theres no need to see the gadget selected as someone said about the Click, DragBox, and Lasso. Anyways, I'm not knocking your method..Thats one thing thats so great about the prefrences..everyone can set it up how they like it.. :) =RRW= @{" Thread 150" link IML-150} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-149 " MSG-149 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 07:53:43 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > RRW> Hmmm? I don't know why but a T/F prefs setting comes to mind here, True > RRW> if you only have a small amount of ram and want to load objects for > RRW> every frame and False if you have Gigs, and Gigs of ram and don't want > RRW> to > RRW> load objects for every frame.. > > This shouldn't need to be an option. Whether it loads the the objects for > each frame of just loads them once, the ram requirements shouldn't be much > different. No argument from me, but if the reason they arn't implementing it is because of low end users, then at least give the high end users an option. I for one wouldn't care if there was a T/F prefs setting, it sure would be better than having it like it is now. > If it were up to me, I'ld prefer it load all the objects as soon as you > open the project, that way switching between the stage, action, and other > editors would be almost instant, and the ability to share objects between > the stage and the detail editor would be a big bonus. > (but, knowing Impulse, this will probably remain a dream) Well lets hope its not only a dream.. > RRW> I must admit I think reloading objects every frame is one of Imagines > RRW> weakest, and worse things it does.. especially for animators. > > The stage editor in general is Imagine's weakest point. It is > an animators night-mare. Impusle needs to take a good hard look at > Lightwave. Well, this is a matter of opinion. But if they are going to look elsewhere I'de prefer it if they take a long look at Wavefronts Preview, rather than Lightwave. =RRW= @{" Thread 213" link IML-213} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-150 " MSG-150 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite @toc contents Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 08:26:37 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Note: the periods above aren't displayed in the gadget, but they do cause > > imagine to put a (one pixel/per period) gap between the gadgets, > > which helps keep things from getting to cluttered. > > Cool! Is this in the manual anywhere, or just another of those hidden > functions, like being able to have two lines of user gadgets? Well, its not really hidden, if you take a close look at the defualt config file. it has some gadgets set up with these already. > I generally have one hand on the keyboard and one on the mouse... I find > that I don't often use the unchangable buttons that Imagine sets up. Would > be nice to be able to change ALL of them. You know, running Imagine at > 700x432 means that even with the extra gadgets, I still have more room than > the default settings. :-) Ya it would be nice to actually make some hot keys with Ctrl, and Amiga(Alt) keys.. I use these alot, and don't have to much trouble using one hand to do it..but then I have long fingures, so that helps quite a bit. =RRW= @{" Thread 128" link IML-128} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-151 " MSG-151 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite @toc contents Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 12:19:06 From: jamiek@hwcces.demon.co.uk (Jamie Knight) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I've found the gadget setup very usefull: > > Group SubGroups Sharp Edges Quick Edges Filter > [Un][Grp] [...Un][Sub][Pk] [...Un][Srp][Pk] [...Un][Qwk] [...Fltr] > > Pk=Pick > > Note: the periods above aren't displayed in the gadget, but they do cause > imagine to put a (one pixel/per period) gap between the gadgets, > which helps keep things from getting to cluttered. I didn't know that! Thanks! I like to get as much as possible on the gadget bar - I have all the modes (Grp, Obj, Pnt, Edg, etc) as a load of three-letter gadgets on the second line, with select mode (Cl, Dr, Ls) and zooming buttons on the top row. I prefer not to use the keyboard, as I can then use Imagine entirely with the mouse and hold a cup of tea with my other hand :) ----------------------------------------+--------------------------- Jamie Knight | jamiek@hwcces.demon.co.uk Environmental Services Computer Support | Hereford & Worcester County Council | Place mildly amusing quote, Worcester, UK | phrase or opinion here.. All views are my own, etc, etc | @{" Thread 148" link IML-148} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-152 " MSG-152 Subject: Disco Ball @toc contents Subject: Disco Ball Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 13:22:50 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, sense I had nothing else to do I thought I'd give a quick try at that Disco Ball and see if what I thought would work would. I think it works pretty nice, but there were a few things I didn't try sense I wanted to post something for you before I hit the sack. Anyways, heres what I did for a fairly simple Disco Ball, but one that stiil looks and works nice. Add a Sphere Load the Chrome.Attribute Add the RadWind texture and set it to: Radial Scale -1.0 Color 1 R 255.0 Z Scaling 3.0 Color 1 G 0.0 Sweep Division 20.0 Color 1 B 0.0 Fraction 'On' 1.0 Color 2 R 255.0 Dist Travelled 0.0 Color 2 G 255.0 Min Spacing 0.4 Color 2 B 255.0 Max Spacing 0.4 Reflect Adj 1.0 Transparancy 0.0 The colors can be changed to what you like, but its a good idea to have one a darker color so that when the Transpar texure lights the walls with the little squares some of them will be darker than others.. It maybe a good idea if you are going to have a couple of colored lights hitting the Disco Ball to use a grey color like 100,100,100 for the dark color and 255,255,255 for the lighter color. Anyways on to the rest of the Disco Ball. Now Add the Transpar texture and leave it at the defualts Now Add an Axis to the center of the ball and set it to a Point Source Light and Cast Shodows. Now your ready to render it.. If you don't have a lot of things to reflect or lots of glass objects you maybe able to speed things up by setting the RSDP in prefs to 2. if you do have a lot of things to render than set it to what need be. But if you want to test out the Disco ball so you can set it up how YOU like it then I would recomend putting it in a box with an open end for viewing and set RSDP to 2. This should work fine for these test. The Ball I have explained should give you a very good starting point, if not good enough for your project? The only thing I found I didn't like about it is the squares are all the same distance apart, but the dark and light colors help break this up a bit as well as having the windows Min & Max Spacing fairly large. You could make these smaller to make the Ball look a bit better but I didn't like the sqaures on the walls so close together when I did this. But then I was testing it in a fairly small box..I think in a larger box it might look quite good. Especially if there were other things in the room for the squares to interact with..Anyways something for you to play with.. Well I hope you like the looks of it. I tried the Mosaic texture on it and that looked pretty cool too, but not quite right. I think these Disc Ball actually have many different shapes on them so the produce different shapes on the ground. But the Mosaic texture was a bit to much. I was going to try a combination of a couple of texture, But thought it would take a while to play around with this and really only wanted to see how my suggestion would work sense I was only guessing about it. And sense it did work I figured I'll leave the playing around with the textures for you.. If you need help with these textures theres a great little program to convert your Imagine Texture and light docs into an easy to read Amiga Guide File..with pictures and all..If you have an IBM..well sorry.. The Program is called IMTguide_1a.lha and is on the Aminet in gfx/3d. Hehehe, sorry I thought it seamed like a good time for some free advertising. Anyways Good Luck and Enjoy! =RRW= @{" Thread 130" link IML-130} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-153 " MSG-153 Subject: Tree's @toc contents Subject: Tree's Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 14:43:47 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- We've been over this dozen's of times before, but anyway; Have anybody ever found a decent PD tree-maker? I've found a demo version of a commercial object modeller called 'Vertex' that seems to make very (VERY) good tree's, but no PD :-( Conny Joensson ** .sig under reconstruction ** @{" Thread 157" link IML-157} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-154 " MSG-154 Subject: Candle @toc contents Subject: Candle Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 14:58:08 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help, I need somebody. Help, not just anybody. Help... ;) This weekend I started to model a candle. The candlestick turned out great, the candle itself was no big problem (just a tube, basically), BUT the flame... I'm not going to use this in any animation, just a still, so the flame doesn't have to be very complex. I made an ellipsoid out of a primitive sphere, applied the 'radial' texture to make it shift colour, and made it a bit transparent. All this is simple. The problem (at least for me) is that I want to use this candle to light my scene, ie it has to be a lightsource. If I add an axis (and make it a light) and put it inside the flame, some of the light will "stay inside" the flame (it is not FULLY transparent, I want to SEE the flame as well) and my scene will not be a bright as I wish it to be. If I put the light somewhere outside the flame the lighting will not originate from the correct place. What do I do? ..you know I need someone. He.e.elp... Conny Joensson ** .sig under reconstruction ** @{" Thread 239" link IML-239} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-155 " MSG-155 Subject: Add44k @toc contents Subject: Add44k Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 16:09:44 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- People have been talking about a utility called 'add44k' which reduces the number of colors in Imagine and thereby speed things up. WHERE IS IT???? Or could some nice person mail it to me (if it ain't too big). Conny Joensson ** .sig under reconstruction ** @{" Thread 91" link IML-91} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-156 " MSG-156 Subject: Imagine 3.2 ? @toc contents Subject: Imagine 3.2 ? Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 18:32:36 From: Shane Davison ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Isn't Imagine 3.2 supposed to be out by now ? So far, my $100 has only brought me _one_ new (and minor) upgrade and the Constant Upgrade period is almost over ! Any info about 3.2 is appreciated. I won't mind if they've made it Windows compatible... -- Shane Davison (tsml) daviso@cs.uregina.ca @{" Thread 174" link IML-174} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-157 " MSG-157 Subject: Re: Tree's @toc contents Subject: Re: Tree's Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 18:39:08 From: Alan_Gordie@pcmailgw.ml.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- have you tried LPARSER3.ZIP, ibelieve you can find it at avalon... it lets you grow trees, ferns, bugs, fish, lobsters and anything else you can stumble across while using it. it works like this...you create a text file describing an L-system and you feed it into an lparser.exe then you view the resulting volume file with lviewer.exe no graphical interface, but i know of some people who are building a front-end for it in Windows. it should be ready in March. if you can't find the file, just email me and ask for the file and i'll uucode it to you. later, alan p.s. thanks to everyone on the "Disco ball effect" replies... ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Tree's Author: cjo@esrange.ssc.se at UNIXGTWY Date: 2/8/95 6:49 AM We've been over this dozen's of times before, but anyway; Have anybody ever found a decent PD tree-maker? I've found a demo version of a commercial object modeller called 'Vertex' that seems to make very (VERY) good tree's, but no PD :-( Conny Joensson ** .sig under reconstruction ** @{" Thread 215" link IML-215} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-158 " MSG-158 Subject: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect @toc contents Subject: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 19:46:59 From: Alan_Gordie_at_JX2ASYS@pcmailgw.ml.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- thanks to everyone who replied re: the Disco Ball... all of your suggestions work great. and thanks also for setting me straight on this ray-tracing/radiosity thing. it makes sense that you shouldn't be able to see the reflected light shining on other objects as raw light. i guess radiosity would increase your rendering time by about ^100 or something outrageous like that. anyway, thanks to everyone for all the help....BTW, any ideas on how to make chaotic cigarette smoke??? :) @{" Thread 180" link IML-180} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-159 " MSG-159 Subject: Imagine 3.1 states & textures @toc contents Subject: Imagine 3.1 states & textures Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 20:20:18 From: Mark Reeves ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, since this is my first posting to the list, I'll try to keep it short and to the point. I received Imagine 3.1 (Amiga, fp) last week ( took ~10 days from posting), and haven't had much time to try it out, but a cursory look is giving me some problems(!) The main problem is States & textures. Just as an experiment I have been trying to create an object ( a simple sphere ) and apply a texture( DinoSkin). I am then trying to morph the texture by creating a new state with slightly changed values for the texture ( the size of the bumps). So I have state Datatypes Texture(bump size x,y,z) ----- --------- ------- default Shape,group,Tex/Brush 3,6,3 centre group 3,6,3 newcentre group,Tex/Brush 30,60,30 Whilst I am in the Detail editor, I can switch between states and the Texture values behave as expected. I can Tween between (say) centre and newcentre and get texture values between the above values. BUT, when I save the object, exit the Detail editor, then reload the object, the values either default to 3,6,3 or to 30,60,30 depending on what state is current when I save. I've also tried selecting Object Props as well as Textures/Brushes, with the same results. What am I doing wrong? An unrelated note, if I run MungWall (A debugging aid), when Imagine finishes rendering a frame, I get masses of errors along the line of freeing memory that shouldn't be. This occurs with a versions of Imagine I have (2.0,2.9, 3.0, 3.1). It would be nice if Imagine behaved better! (It wasn't very short, sorry!) Mark Reeves A1200/GVP1230II/SCSI/8M @{" Thread 168" link IML-168} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-160 " MSG-160 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.2 ? @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine 3.2 ? Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 20:43:08 From: beeton@SEDSystems.ca (Gary Beeton, beeton@SEDSystems.ca) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Isn't Imagine 3.2 supposed to be out by now ? >So far, my $100 has only brought me _one_ new >(and minor) upgrade and the Constant Upgrade >period is almost over ! Any info about 3.2 >is appreciated. I won't mind if they've made >it Windows compatible... Shane, I ordered the Constant Upgrade program about two weeks ago, at which time Impulse said that 3.2 would be out in about two weeks (I'm not about to hold my breath though). Impulse originally planned to release 4.0 about a year after 3.0 came out, but that looks unlikely now. Don't worry about that year running out. What you and I have paid for is 4.0 with intermediate releases thrown in for good measure. Gary beeton@SEDSystems.ca @{" Thread 275" link IML-275} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-161 " MSG-161 Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine @toc contents Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 20:43:44 From: Kenneth Jennings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Halvorson wrote about Re: LW vs. Imagine >Mr. Jennings > >I doubt that anyone has ever lied to you, and if so what is that they >lied about, I wont lie to you, so why dont you tell me what this supposed bug >is, bring out the issue based on facts, not something that a magazine might or >might not have any idea about. I trust users but find little to trust when it >comes to a magazine which is set up to deal only with income and advertisers, >the rest of the magazine is devoted to filling the pulp with fiction or what >they might call fact. > >I certainly dont mind that people have a difference, and you are of >course welcome to your right to express your self in what ever manner you want. >But you say there was "SOME" problem, what was it or what is it. I have no >problem in dealing with what ever you have heard or think you heard. This is >your opportunity to make a difference if you so desire, I look forward to your >message. > >Mike Halvorson After I had Imagine 2.0 for a while I saw an animation by PDI with an animated locomotive chugging through an extremely realistic forest. Close observation of the forest revealed that the trees were simple poles with images of pine branches mapped onto a few flat polygons (similar to the point of a hunting arrow.) Transparency mapping was used to blur the edges of the brush images and to make the rest of the polygons invisible -- thus a good imitation of a slab-o-tree. I did the same thing in Imagine. With a few trees in the scene, Imagine would start rendering black rectangles when it had to trace through a few 'leaf' planes. (Actually tracing has nothing to do with it, scan-line did the same thing.) This was not a low memory or resolve depth situation either. Additionally, I discovered that the edges of the polygons were visible as thin black lines. No matter how I massaged the transparency map or messed with full/max value setting the polygon edges were still visible. I reported this to Impulse where I was told, "It doesn't happen here." So, I thought screw it. My life didn't depend on Imagine's ability to correctly render transparent objects at that point, anyway. (I am at work at the moment, so I'll have to get the exact issue and author tonight...) A few months later, Amazing Computing published a *tutorial* submitted to them on realistic foliage in Imagine. In it the author documented exactly what I did to make the trees (in his case grass). The tutorial included a full color print of a 24-bit image of grasses and bushes he had done which had the exact same black lines and black rectangles I had seen in my renderings, but much worse. I remember the author was extrememly forgiving of Imagine's rendering errors and Amazing had nothing 'editorial' to add to his comments. +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ | Kenneth Jennings, Amiga Advocate | | ====== SyntheToonz, Inc & ====== | | "Happy I'm not a PC/Mac lemming." | | ====== Equine Video Studios ====== | | kenneth@daffy.aatech.com | | = Ken, Computer Animation Artiste = | | Applied Automation Techniques, Inc. | | = Lynn, Video Maven = | | Obviously not the opinions of AAT. | | = Bruno The Wonder Dog = | +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ "You'd think that PC and Mac users willing to gut their systems to achieve the Amiga's level of performance would just save themselves the trouble and buy Amigas in the first place. But they don't know any better -- they read BYTE." @{" Thread 188" link IML-188} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-162 " MSG-162 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.2 ? @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine 3.2 ? Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 21:07:52 From: William Eric Donoho ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, Shane Davison wrote: > > Hi, > > Isn't Imagine 3.2 supposed to be out by now ? > So far, my $100 has only brought me _one_ new > (and minor) upgrade and the Constant Upgrade > period is almost over ! Any info about 3.2 > is appreciated. I won't mind if they've made > it Windows compatible... > > -- > Shane Davison (tsml) > daviso@cs.uregina.ca > > Yeah, I upgraded halfway through when I heard 3.1 was out. I wonder what the upgrade fee will be after 3.2... because you know that 3.2 won't be out until the very end of the upgrade year. Maybe they're working on a way to get imagine running under OS/2 ? Eric Donoho | "Let's go to burger king and get Louisville, KY USA | a chicken sandwich!" donoho@iglou.com @{" Thread 160" link IML-160} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-163 " MSG-163 Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect @toc contents Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 21:55:20 From: Calvin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, 8 Feb 1995 Alan_Gordie_at_JX2ASYS@pcmailgw.ml.com wrote: > i guess radiosity would increase your rendering time by about ^100 > or something outrageous like that. It doesn't really increase your rendering time *that* much. The advantage of radiosity is that it takes a hell of a long time to do the *first* frame. The reason why radiosity takes so long is that it's solving for every point. This means that once you render the first frame, every frame after that will be very quick! That's why a lot of architechs use it for walk-through animations, rendering LIVE with radiosity. Once the first frame is rendered, you can go and do real-time walkthrough animations and stuff. Pretty cool. o/ \o/ o <|><|> <|\ mi da' morte pena crudel: e per me solo sono /| / \ /| / \ // \\ / \ tiranni gli astri, la sorte, i numi, il ciel. """""""""""""""""""""""""""" Finger for PGP Public Key Block and Fingerprint @{" Thread 166" link IML-166} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-164 " MSG-164 Subject: I`ve got lots of PD XSpecs software for any who want it. @toc contents Subject: I`ve got lots of PD XSpecs software for any who want it. Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 22:12:44 From: Charles Hymes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wow, Ive' lurked here for two years, collected 8226 messages, and this is my first post.(I think) Anyway, I have an archive of XSpecs software for any who want it. If there is enough interest, I will make it available through WWW. There are 3d object editors, games, development stuff, and pictures. x-specs/disfunctional/failed_3danim x-specs/disfunctional/XspecsPics01.lzh x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/XSpecs.LZH x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/readme x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/ThreeBallTrick x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/xspecs.h x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/xspecsglu.asm x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/xspecsglu.o x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/ThreeBallTrick.c x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/ThreeBallTrick.o x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/xspecs.library x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/XSpecs.uua x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/lattice_XSpecs.LZH x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_C/lattice_readme x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_assembly/readme x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_assembly/threeballs x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_assembly/xspecs.lib x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_assembly/threeballs.asm x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_assembly/xspeclib.lzh x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_assembly/xspecslib.i x-specs/programming/x-specs_lib_assembly/xspecslib.doc x-specs/programming/wide_bitmap/bigtest.c x-specs/programming/wide_bitmap/smalltest.c x-specs/programming/wide_bitmap/bigtest x-specs/programming/wide_bitmap/lmkfile x-specs/programming/RHornelib.lzh x-specs/incoming/xanim.lzh x-specs/incoming/Drive.lzh x-specs/incoming/Drive.readme x-specs/incoming/anim-player.lzh x-specs/incoming/sega10.zip x-specs/incoming/blue.box x-specs/incoming/anim-player.readme x-specs/incoming/readme.txt x-specs/incoming/stereowx.gif x-specs/incoming/stereowx.doc x-specs/incoming/-systemfile x-specs/incoming/-smallsys x-specs/incoming/spssxout x-specs/pictures/maryjane_the_cat.lzh x-specs/pictures/rembrant_the_dog.lzh x-specs/pictures/fruit.lzh x-specs/pictures/kitchen.lzh x-specs/pictures/subburbs.lzh x-specs/pictures/SculptApple.lzh x-specs/pictures/AcroByteLogo.lzh x-specs/utilities/smash.lha x-specs/utilities/smash.readme x-specs/XDCTV/sculptapple.readme x-specs/XDCTV/SculptAppleDCTV.xspecs x-specs/games/RHornegames.lzh x-specs/documents/x-specs_info x-specs/documents/XspecsAnimFormat.txt x-specs/documents/x-specs-text x-specs/documents/x-specs_folk x-specs/applications/VM3D_Demo.lzh x-specs/applications/scene3dX.lzh @{" Thread 169" link IML-169} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-165 " MSG-165 Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine Date: Wednesday, 08 February 1995 23:44:55 From: craigh@fa.disney.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Feb 8, 10:40am, imagine-relay@email.sp.paramax.com wrote: > > I did the same thing in Imagine. With a few trees in the scene, > Imagine would start rendering black rectangles when it had to trace > through a few 'leaf' planes. (Actually tracing has nothing to > do with it, scan-line did the same thing.) This was not a low memory > or resolve depth situation either. Additionally, I discovered that > the edges of the polygons were visible as thin black lines. No matter > how I massaged the transparency map or messed with full/max value > setting the polygon edges were still visible. Funny, I noticed weird things about transparency years ago, too. When putting several fully transparent things in front of each other (not touching), I got artifacts where they overlapped. It wasn't noticeable with just one object, but it was very noticeable with three or more. My friend reported it to Impulse, but I can't remember their response. He didn't care, because his company changed over to Lightwave due to such weirdness. Does this problem still occur?!? The problem I saw seems like a numerical precision problem. By the way, I too got a message form Mr. Halvorson about some of my comments on this list. It was nice, but a little confrontational like yours. Whatever happened to "the customer is always right"? It seems funny, but companies like Alias and Side Effects (both for the SGI) go out of their way to write down bugs called in by users. No confrontations; no "well, obviously you don't understand how the software works"; just "OH MY GOD! AN ERROR?!? HORRORS!! WHERE IS IT? LET ME WRITE THIS DOWN!!" Impulse expects the customer (who paid for the software) to do all of the work to get some notice and respect for their bug. And then there is never a response to let you know where it stands. Sure, software will always have bugs, but the mark of a mature software company is how it scrambles to keep the customer happy. -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Craig Hoffman craigh@fa.disney.com (818) 544-2179 Walt Disney Feature Animation 1420 Flower Street Glendale, CA 91221 _____________________________________________________________________________ @{" Thread 140" link IML-140} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-166 " MSG-166 Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect @toc contents Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 00:01:01 From: craigh@fa.disney.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > It doesn't really increase your rendering time *that* much. The > advantage of radiosity is that it takes a hell of a long time to do the > *first* frame. > > >-- End of excerpt from imagine-relay@email.sp.paramax.com This is only the case when lights don't change, only the viewpoint does. A spinning disco ball with reflections changing every frame would have to be recalculated at every frame. Does anyone else remember something a few years back where Impulse planned on implementing some sort of radiosity? -- _____________________________________________________________________________ __ ##### Craig Hoffman #~ ~### craigh@fa.disney.com @ @ #?) < /| Walt Disney Feature Animation `-' / |__/ _____________________________________________________________________________ @{" Thread 63" link IML-63} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-167 " MSG-167 Subject: Re: PD XSpecs software @toc contents Subject: Re: PD XSpecs software Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 00:01:26 From: beeton@SEDSystems.ca (Gary Beeton, beeton@SEDSystems.ca) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Anyway, I have an archive of XSpecs software for any who want it. >If there is enough interest, I will make it available through WWW. >There are 3d object editors, games, development stuff, and pictures. Yes, I am interested, but I don't have WWW access. What is your email address? Gary beeton@SEDSystems.ca @{" Thread 44" link IML-44} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-168 " MSG-168 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.1 states & textures @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine 3.1 states & textures Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 03:55:47 From: "Steve J. Lombardi" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Whilst I am in the Detail editor, I can switch between states and the Texture > values behave as expected. I can Tween between (say) centre and newcentre and > get texture values between the above values. > > BUT, when I save the object, exit the Detail editor, then reload the object, > the values either default to 3,6,3 or to 30,60,30 depending on what state > is current when I save. > This is a well known imagine problem. I know at least a few folks here on IML have reported it to impulse. I really hope this is fixed in 3.2. and i REALLY hope the rumored support for display database is there. -- steve lombardi stlombo@acm.rpi.edu @{" Thread 177" link IML-177} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-169 " MSG-169 Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpecs software for any who want it. @toc contents Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpecs software for any who want it. Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 05:11:03 From: Shane Davison ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Does this XSpecs stuff work on any PC "specs" or is it just Amiga ? I *love* this type of 3D stuff and I'm always looking for more. I have 3D LCD shutter glasses from 3D TV corporation and a CyberScope from Simsalabim (both for the PC). I'd appreciate info from anyone else out there who is interested in this type of 3D stuff (using Imagine or whatever) and anyone else who owns similar hardware. Thanks, -- Shane Davison (tsml) daviso@cs.uregina.ca @{" Thread 339" link IML-339} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-170 " MSG-170 Subject: Re: Where is add44k @toc contents Subject: Re: Where is add44k Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 05:49:16 From: kxs156@psu.edu (Kaspar Stromme) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't know where the file is by itself, but I got mine from the DeluxePacMan archive (Fred Fish disk 867, available from nic.funet.fi among others) Apparently the program was created to give games more memory (add44k), by cutting other screens in half. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kaspar Stromme 40mhz68030/'882;9MB;340MB kxs156@email.psu.edu DCTV true-color system PC-MAC = PoliticalCorrect-MindAbsentComputing ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- @{" Thread 21" link IML-21} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-171 " MSG-171 Subject: Help needed running Imagine on ATI Ultra Pro @toc contents Subject: Help needed running Imagine on ATI Ultra Pro Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 06:17:58 From: rhh@ct.picker.com (Randall Hopper) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I haven't had any success getting Imagine to run on my ATI Graphics Ultra Pro. Impulse says it doesn't want to run in Windows enhanced mode (something about it can't handle DPMI), but my ATI GUP drivers require enhanced mode (for all modes, high- and true-color included). I tried stepping down to the 8514/A driver and standard mode, but Imagine still won't run -- it simply ceases to print any error messages. Has anyone been able to get Imagine to work on an ATI Mach32 card? Any responses would be appreciated. Please CC responses to "rhh@ct.picker.com" as I just recently submitted my subscription request to this mailing list and I don't think I'm "officially" on it yet. Also, if you have an e-mail address/ phone number for Impulse, I'd be interested in that as well. More on my system configuration: 486-33 w/ 8Megs, Windows 3.1, ATI Graphics Ultra Pro 2M VLB Card (with the 68875 RAMDAC), and Mach32 windows drivers (ver 2.2). I've tried all sorts of configs, including the recommended HIMEM.SYS only. Also, I'm trying to run the version of Imagine that comes with the book "3D Modeling Lab" (despite what the book says, I assume that this is not a fully-functional current version). Thanks in advance for any replies. Randall Hopper rhh@ct.picker.com @{" Thread 181" link IML-181} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-172 " MSG-172 Subject: How to make a spaceship shield using Essence textures @toc contents Subject: How to make a spaceship shield using Essence textures Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 07:36:49 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A CompuServe user asked how to use an Essence texture, Shellturb, to simulate a photon blast on a ship. I thought my response might be of interest to the ever-sizeable spaceship fetish crowd. B^) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen, to be exact, the Essence manual mentions applying Shellturb in order to simulate a bolt of energy hitting _the ship_, not a ring _around_ the ship. To do a Star Trek-like "shield absorbs energy blast and dissipates it", you need to create a sphere for the shield. You then use Shellturb combined with SwapCRF to _vary the transparency_ of the texture and make the energy blast visible. Here's an example: - Create a standard Imagine sphere. Scale in Z by 0.5. - Give it a color of 255,255,255 and click on Bright. Add the Bandturb (not Shellturb) texture. - Edit the texture as follows: 1st column: 0, 20, 30, 20, 10, 5, 4, 0.4 2nd column: 0.4, 0.4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0. Axis position: 110, 0, 0; alignment: 0, -90, 0 - Add the SwapCRF texture. All parameters should be 0, except Color -> N Filt which should be 1. - Add the Solid texture. Leave all parameters at -1 and set Color to 50, 255, 200. - The texture order should read, from top to bottom: Bandturb, SwapCRF, Solid. If not, use the Priority button to make it so. - States/Create DEFAULT, click Textures/Brushes on. - States/Create START, click Textures/Brushes on. (This is not a typo. Unless I'm mistaken, you should refrain from using the default state in an animation, which is why I had you create an identical state. Anyone care to comment on this?) - Change the texture: Time to 1 Fade to 1 Position to -50, 0, 0 - States/Create END. - In Action, morph from START to END over N frames. You'll see an energy blast hit the right side of the image, where the ship inside the shield would presumably be pointing, and travel along the shield, dissipating as it goes along. How does it work? The base object is white, and gets a turbulent band of black applied to it using Bandturb. Then, SwapCRF turns this color information into _filter_ values -- black means no filter, white means fully transparent. This makes part of the shield visible. All that's needed is to give the visible parta of shield a color using Solid. Finally, we create two states, START and END, which allow the texture axis to travel from one end of the shield to the other. The END state also has Bandturb's Fade parameter set all the way to 1, so that the texture loses strength as it travels along the shield. Just add a ship inside the shield, and a starfield in the background. The effect is BEAUTIFUL. Bug alert --------- Imagine 3.1 doesn't remember texture parameters and axis settings very well when you use States. Until that bug is fixed, you'll need to create two separate objects, Shield-start and shield-end, and morph from one object to the next. No big deal. @{" Thread 87" link IML-87} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-173 " MSG-173 Subject: Particles help! @toc contents Subject: Particles help! Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 08:31:30 From: Lamar Milligan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, Imagine LT got here, and I've enjoyed playing with it so far. A few notes about Imagine LT: It only comes with 2 FX (Gloabal Lens Flare and Particles), it has only a fraction of the textures (36, and most of the interesting sounding ones are missing.), and Kinematics and Cycle Editors are missing. This is no problem, the only thing I didn't expect to be gone were the textures & Fx. Those losses hurt. They also are the losses that I am purchasing Imagine Pro for. (Those fiendish Impulse folks. Sneaky, aren't they?) :) Well, now for my woes: I can't seem to get particles to work for an object. Nothing in the documentation or in the readme files claims they are removed, unless (I doubt this) they are considered part of kinematics. I create a new object: a torus for example, w/ default settings. I then select that object, and click on the particles menu option (detail editor). As the manual suggests, I am in Pick Object mode, have the object selected, and then select Particles. I have also tried this after fracturing the object, and also while in Pick faces, edges, and points mode. The manual states that the Particles requester should pop up for me. All I get is an error saying "Invalid Object Type". What am I doing wrong? Are particles removed from L/T, and if so, why do I have the particle F/X (which I believe are used in conjuction with particle objects, tho I may be mistaken)? Thanks for any help you can give me, Can't wait for Imagine Pro... Benjamin Milligan lamarm@moe.coe.uga.edu @{" Thread 182" link IML-182} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-174 " MSG-174 Subject: Imagine 3.2 ? (fwd) @toc contents Subject: Imagine 3.2 ? (fwd) Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 08:47:30 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Shane Davison Look at it this way; I was telling a friend the exact same thing on the phone tonight: when you finally receive the last upgrade, would you rather it represent two years' worth of accumulated work, or one year's? Think about it. @{" Thread 162" link IML-162} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-175 " MSG-175 Subject: RE: LW VS. IMAGINE @toc contents Subject: RE: LW VS. IMAGINE Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 09:05:06 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mike Vandersommen Lightwave certainly impliments BONES much better and easier. In LW, all ------------------------------------------------------------ Although to be honest, in Lightwave you control which faces of an object are affected by a certain bone, by setting a length of influence, which defines a "cold capsule"-like region of space. Fine -- but then try to do that most basic of examples, the robot hand! As soon as one finger moves next to another, the neighboring fingers get partially stretched too. Imagine has its pluses and minuses, but I love the idea of selecting two groups of faces to define what gets affected by a bone, and what doesn't. @{" Thread 104" link IML-104} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-176 " MSG-176 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite @toc contents Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 09:42:43 From: Mtucibat@cris.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On 2-8, Jamie Knight wrote: J> I like to get as much as possible on the gadget bar - I have all the J> modes (Grp, Obj, Pnt, Edg, etc) as a load of three-letter gadgets on J> the second line, with select mode (Cl, Dr, Ls) and zooming buttons on J> the top row. ======== The user gadgets are an excellent design feature. Hard to believe we once had to get along without them... I saw Randy's comment about keeping the Perspective Window buttons to a minimum, but I could sure use one more there - "R" for Reset. J> I prefer not to use the keyboard, as I can then use Imagine entirely J> with the mouse and hold a cup of tea with my other hand :) ======== Hmmm... My preferences seem to be set for Espresso. :) -mikeT * Offline Orbit 0.70a * ...Sleep is a poor substitute for Raytracing... @{" Thread 185" link IML-185} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-177 " MSG-177 Subject: Re: Imagine 3.1 states & textures @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine 3.1 states & textures Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 10:12:09 From: Mtucibat@cris.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On 2-8, Steve Lombardi S> > S> >Whilst I am in the Detail editor, I can switch between states and the S> >Texture values behave as expected. I can Tween between (say) centre and S> > newcentre and get texture values between the above values. S> > S> > BUT, when I save the object, exit the Detail editor, then reload the S> >object, the values either default to 3,6,3 or to 30,60,30 depending on S> >what state is current when I save. S> S> This is a well known imagine problem. I know at least a few folks here on S> S> IML have reported it to impulse. I really hope this is fixed in 3.2. and S> i REALLY hope the rumored support for display database is there. ============ It seems that this can be worked around by updating the state(s) that get changed by the later settings. They then seem to save corectly. -mikeT * Offline Orbit 0.70a * ...Amiga: Designed to break the laws of physics... @{" Thread 404" link IML-404} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-178 " MSG-178 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 10:34:45 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Randy R. Wall I must admit I think reloading objects every frame is one of Imagines weakest, and worse things it does.. especially for animators. =RRW= ------------------------------------------------------------ I agree. Here's a solution that fits within Mike's argument of "we need to support even the lowly machines": - Load everything needed to render the first frame. Render it. - Examine the list of objects, textures, and brushmaps needed for the second frame. Drop those which were in the first frame and are not needed anymore; conversely, load those elements from the second frame which aren't already in memory. HOWEVER, DO NOT needlessly reload those elements which had already been loaded to render the first frame! - Repeat until anim is done. Imagine's strategy of "flush everything when beginning a new frame" may be easy to implement, it also stinks. A straw poll of IML users might show this to be one of the most frustrating features of the program. And regarding those lowly machines: you still have to assume they have enough memory to load all the elements for every frame; if so, they too would benefit from smarter element management. You don't have to preload everything needed for the whole animation, although as someone else said, a Preferences T/F flag for this would be a big plus. @{" Thread 123" link IML-123} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-179 " MSG-179 Subject: Candle @toc contents Subject: Candle Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 10:36:40 From: torgeir.holm@tbc.bbs.no (TORGEIR HOLM) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- [CJO's candle flame question] I made an animation of a candle a while back, which came out pretty nice. Take your basic candle-flame ellipsoid shape and add the following attributes: Fog Length: 0.10 Texture: Ghost Fog length at T: 400 T: 0.8 Texture: FogTop Fog length at T: 200 T: 0.5 Noise Magnitude: 0 Place the axis so that the origin is in the tip of the flame, and the bottom of the bounding box is 2/3 towards the bottom of the flame. With the Z axis pointing up. Texture: Fireball Color1: 255,255,100 Color2: 200,030,000 Noise: 0 Reflect&Filter 1&2: 0 Place the axis so that the origin is in the bottom of the flame, and the end of the Y axis is in the tip. BTW: my object was about 60 units wide, and 150 units tall. You can now add a child axis in the middle of your flame, and make it a lightsource. To animate this, make sure the Y axis points upward (Do this before adding textures, as their placement is relative to the axis), and move the the object up along a wavy path with conform to path. Then move the path back dovn a mirror copy of itself, so that the flame stays in the same position. Makes a really nice and realistic candle- flame Torge!r torgeir.holm@tbc.bbs.no @{" Thread 187" link IML-187} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-180 " MSG-180 Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect @toc contents Subject: Re: Thanks for help on Disco Ball Effect Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 10:49:53 From: "Randy R. Wall" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Does anyone else remember something a few years back where Impulse planned on > implementing some sort of radiosity? Yes..I believe we sould have had it with 3.0..as well as some other things I am still waiting for. =RRW= @{" Thread 163" link IML-163} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-181 " MSG-181 Subject: Re: Help needed running Imagine on ATI Ultra Pro @toc contents Subject: Re: Help needed running Imagine on ATI Ultra Pro Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 11:19:48 From: Shane Davison ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Randall Hopper wrote: >I haven't had any success getting Imagine to run on my ATI Graphics Ultra >Pro. Impulse says it doesn't want to run in Windows enhanced mode (something >about it can't handle DPMI), but my ATI GUP drivers require enhanced mode (for >all modes, high- and true-color included). I tried stepping down to the 8514/A >driver and standard mode, but Imagine still won't run -- it simply ceases to >print any error messages. I used to have an ATI Graphics Ultra Plus and Imagine ran fine on it BUT... Imagine does NOT run under Windows in any way whatsoever. You should have no problems with DOS (you only need to run a VESA driver to show pict's) but there is NO way that Imagine will run under anything but pure DOS. If anyone knows different, please let me know. Oh, and the 3D Modeling Lab book includes a fully-functional version of Imagine 2.0 (the current version is 3.1). -- Shane Davison (tsml) daviso@cs.uregina.ca @{" Thread 220" link IML-220} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-182 " MSG-182 Subject: Re: Particles help! @toc contents Subject: Re: Particles help! Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 11:59:37 From: Shane Davison ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, hi ! Particles should work for your torus. Just in case there is something wrong with the default torus settings, try starting Imagine L/T afresh and go straight to the Detail Editor. Then add a primitive sphere (the defaults should be 24 and 12 with the box checked, I think). Finally, select Particles from the menu. If the Particles requester doesn't pop-up, I'd be inclined to think Impulse has left this out (like I'd originally thought they would) but your best bet is to call them. BTW, the actual particles aren't visible until you render the object. The Particles special effect is really not related that much to the Particles in the Detail Editor (although you can use them together). Despite the similar names, they both operate on a slightly different definition of Particles. Any object (particalized (?) or not) can use the Particle special effect (which, btw, I can't believe they left in Imagine L/T because it is by far the most complex and difficult to use special fx, IMO). Regards, -- Shane Davison (tsml) daviso@cs.uregina.ca @{" Thread 54" link IML-54} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-183 " MSG-183 Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine(brushmap transparency "bug") @toc contents Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine(brushmap transparency "bug") Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 11:59:40 From: Ted Stethem ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, Kenneth Jennings wrote: > > > Mike Halvorson > wrote about Re: LW vs. Imagine > > >Mr. Jennings > > > >I doubt that anyone has ever lied to you, and if so what is that they > >lied about, I wont lie to you, so why dont you tell me what this supposed bug > >is, bring out the issue based on facts, not something that a magazine might o r > >might not have any idea about. I trust users but find little to trust when i t > >comes to a magazine which is set up to deal only with income and advertisers, > >the rest of the magazine is devoted to filling the pulp with fiction or what > >they might call fact. > > > >I certainly dont mind that people have a difference, and you are of > >course welcome to your right to express your self in what ever manner you wan t. > >But you say there was "SOME" problem, what was it or what is it. I have no > >problem in dealing with what ever you have heard or think you heard. This is > >your opportunity to make a difference if you so desire, I look forward to your > >message. > > > >Mike Halvorson > > After I had Imagine 2.0 for a while I saw an animation by PDI with an > animated locomotive chugging through an extremely realistic forest. > Close observation of the forest revealed that the trees were simple > poles with images of pine branches mapped onto a few flat polygons > (similar to the point of a hunting arrow.) Transparency mapping > was used to blur the edges of the brush images and to make the rest > of the polygons invisible -- thus a good imitation of a slab-o-tree. > > I did the same thing in Imagine. With a few trees in the scene, > Imagine would start rendering black rectangles when it had to trace > through a few 'leaf' planes. (Actually tracing has nothing to > do with it, scan-line did the same thing.) This was not a low memory > or resolve depth situation either. Additionally, I discovered that > the edges of the polygons were visible as thin black lines. No matter > how I massaged the transparency map or messed with full/max value > setting the polygon edges were still visible. > > I reported this to Impulse where I was told, "It doesn't happen here." > So, I thought screw it. My life didn't depend on Imagine's ability > to correctly render transparent objects at that point, anyway. > > (I am at work at the moment, so I'll have to get > the exact issue and author tonight...) > A few months later, Amazing Computing published a *tutorial* submitted > to them on realistic foliage in Imagine. In it the author documented > exactly what I did to make the trees (in his case grass). The tutorial > included a full color print of a 24-bit image of grasses and bushes he > had done which had the exact same black lines and black rectangles I > had seen in my renderings, but much worse. > > I remember the author was extrememly forgiving of Imagine's rendering > errors and Amazing had nothing 'editorial' to add to his comments. > > +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ > | Kenneth Jennings, Amiga Advocate | | ====== SyntheToonz, Inc & ====== | > | "Happy I'm not a PC/Mac lemming." | | ====== Equine Video Studios ====== | > | kenneth@daffy.aatech.com | | = Ken, Computer Animation Artiste = | > | Applied Automation Techniques, Inc. | | = Lynn, Video Maven = | > | Obviously not the opinions of AAT. | | = Bruno The Wonder Dog = | > +-------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------- + > "You'd think that PC and Mac users willing to gut their systems to achieve the > Amiga's level of performance would just save themselves the trouble and buy > Amigas in the first place. But they don't know any better -- they read BYTE." > > I won't comment on Mr. Halvorson's idea of customer support or netiquette. However, the problem with transparencies of brushmaps can be dealt with in a certain fashion. There is something going on with the brushmap portion of Imagine, which I cannot define from an inner working perspective, but as a user, maybe you will remember the scanline reflection bug in 3.0 when it first came out. In this bug, a reflective object would not reflect the Global brushmap. If you had 2.9, Imagine totally lost brush transparency, which was working in 2.0. Now, something has changed again in 3.0 and 3.1. Somehow, now, the brushmap transparency is related to RSDP (Resolve Depth Parameter in preferences). In 2.0, RSDP was only supposed to affect rendering in Trace mode, oh BTW, RSDP sets the number of bounces of reflected light in a ray trace scene (this is from the 3.0 manual). And then, it has always been advised to keep this to 3 or less as it has an effect on rendering times and besides, you hardly ever need more than three bounces to effectivly simulate reflection. Well, after all that, guess what? Now, somehow RSDP affects the transparency of brushmaps! in Scanline mode no less! Try setting your RSDP to something like 16 or more then try rendering your overlapping tree brushmaps. It will work! But not without a subsequent cost in rendering time. Do you have a bald spot on your head where you have been scratching to figure out why Imagine is not working the way you expect or is documented to work? @{" Thread 209" link IML-209} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-184 " MSG-184 Subject: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: LW vs. Imagine Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 13:03:18 From: mrivers@tbag.tscs.com (Mike Rivers) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mike Halvorson >wrote about Re: LW vs. Imagine >Mr. Jennings > >I doubt that anyone has ever lied to you, and if so what is that they >lied about, I wont lie to you, so why dont you tell me what this supposed bug >is, bring out the issue based on facts, not something that a magazine might or >might not have any idea about. Mr. Halverson has an exceptional way of making people feel welcome. >I trust users but find little to trust when it >comes to a magazine which is set up to deal only with income and advertisers, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Amazingly, a lot like Impulse's newsletter. >the rest of the magazine is devoted to filling the pulp with fiction or >what they might call fact. Still, Amazingly, a lot like Impulse's newsletter. >I certainly dont mind that people have a difference, and you are of ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >course welcome to your right to express your self in what ever manner you want. Amazing. Almost every time I expess my opinion about Imagine, I recieve a message from Mr. Halverson, or from my sysop telling me Mr. Halverson is trying to have my net access cut, or a message Mr.Halverson threatening to sue. I would suggest that Impulse get a better PR person who doesn't belittle their customers. >But you say there was "SOME" problem, what was it or what is it. I >have no problem in dealing with what ever you have heard or think you heard. >This is your opportunity to make a difference if you so desire, >I look forward to your message. Somehow, I seriously doubt it. >Mike Halvorson KJ> I reported this to Impulse where I was told, "It doesn't happen here." KJ> So, I thought screw it. Well, you not alone in that respect. ------------------------------------------------------- | Commodore failure. Press mouse button to continue | | Guru Meditation $35000000 Task : $00000CBM | ------------------------------------------------------- A4000/060/90mhz WOW! this is fast. 140 Mips 50 Mflops. @{" Thread 70" link IML-70} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-185 " MSG-185 Subject: Re: Function key Favorite @toc contents Subject: Re: Function key Favorite Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 13:30:33 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike T wrote; > The user gadgets are an excellent design feature. Hard to > believe we once had to get along without them... I saw Randy's > comment about keeping the Perspective Window buttons to a > minimum, but I could sure use one more there - "R" for Reset. YES, I like that idea. I seem to be resetting my perspective view constantly. And while we are at it, is there anyway to change the default FOV in the perspective window. Every time you reset it FOV goes to 90 degrees. This makes objects look somewhat distorted. Whenever I reset I usually change to 45 degrees FOV. (Hmm, "usually"? More like "every single time".) Conny Joensson ** .sig under reconstruction ** @{" Thread 151" link IML-151} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-186 " MSG-186 Subject: Re: Candle @toc contents Subject: Re: Candle Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 13:46:41 From: mrivers@tbag.tscs.com (Mike Rivers) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- [...] C> scene, ie it has to be a lightsource. C> If I add an axis (and make it a light) and put it inside the flame, some C> of C> the light will "stay inside" the flame (it is not FULLY transparent, I C> want C> to SEE the flame as well) and my scene will not be a bright as I wish it C> to C> be. [...] C> What do I do? Set the fog length of the object to something greater than zero. Fog objects don't cast shadows, and if you set the Fog len to .01, the object still appears solid. If you have I3.X, here's a free candle tip: Make a brushmap with a vertical gadient from the white(top) to black(bottom). Then make another brushmap that is solid white. Apply the gradient map to the candle as a 'reflectivity' map and appy the solid white map as a 'reflection' map. This makes the candle stick glow like a real lit candle. ------------------------------------------------------- | Commodore failure. Press mouse button to continue | | Guru Meditation $35000000 Task : $00000CBM | ------------------------------------------------------- A4000/060/90mhz WOW! this is fast. 140 Mips 50 Mflops. @{" Thread 216" link IML-216} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-187 " MSG-187 Subject: Re: Candle @toc contents Subject: Re: Candle Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 14:04:02 From: rbyrne@3dform.edex.edu.au (Robert Byrne) (Robert Byrne) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- In article <9502081232.aa23296@unixpc.esrange.ssc.se> Conny Joensson writes: > Help, I need somebody. > Help, not just anybody. > Help... ;) > > This weekend I started to model a candle. > The candlestick turned out great, the candle itself was no big problem (just > a tube, basically), BUT the flame... > > I'm not going to use this in any animation, just a still, so the flame > doesn't have to be very complex. I made an ellipsoid out of a primitive > sphere, applied the 'radial' texture to make it shift colour, and made it a > bit transparent. All this is simple. > > The problem (at least for me) is that I want to use this candle to light my > scene, ie it has to be a lightsource. > If I add an axis (and make it a light) and put it inside the flame, some of > the light will "stay inside" the flame (it is not FULLY transparent, I want > to SEE the flame as well) and my scene will not be a bright as I wish it to > be. > If I put the light somewhere outside the flame the lighting will not > originate from the correct place. > > What do I do? > > ..you know I need someone. > He.e.elp... Hi Conny, With a little help from my friends ... :-) I can only think of one thing to try. The manual suggests either increasing transparency, moving the light axis outside of the flame or create a hole in the flame to let the light shine through. You might like to try and Fracture the flame object with a value just over 1.0. This will displace the faces slightly and create gaps for the light to shine through. A combination of this and transparency might work. It might create problems however, if the light source is casting shadows. BTW - thanks for the reply regarding my not receiving the IML, it's been sorted out :-) What do you see when you turn out the light ... Bye, Bob. : Robert (Bob) Byrne : A3000/25 : vox Ph: +61 66 864324 : : rbyrne@3dform.edex.edu.au : : Ballina, NSW Australia : @{" Thread 190" link IML-190} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-188 " MSG-188 Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 17:21:33 From: Kenneth Jennings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Rivers wrote about: LW vs. Imagine > Mike Halvorson >wrote about Re: LW vs. Imagine >>Mr. Jennings >> >>I doubt that anyone has ever lied to you, and if so what is that they >>lied about, I wont lie to you, so why dont you tell me what this supposed >>bug is, bring out the issue based on facts, not something that a magazine >>might or might not have any idea about. >Mr. Halverson has an exceptional way of making people feel welcome. >>I trust users but find little to trust when it >>comes to a magazine which is set up to deal only with income and advertisers, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >Amazingly, a lot like Impulse's newsletter. >>the rest of the magazine is devoted to filling the pulp with fiction or >>what they might call fact. >Still, Amazingly, a lot like Impulse's newsletter. >>I certainly dont mind that people have a difference, and you are of ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>course welcome to your right to express your self in what ever manner you >want. >Amazing. Almost every time I expess my opinion about Imagine, >I recieve a message from Mr. Halverson, or from my sysop telling >me Mr. Halverson is trying to have my net access cut, or >a message Mr.Halverson threatening to sue. I would suggest >that Impulse get a better PR person who doesn't belittle >their customers. >>But you say there was "SOME" problem, what was it or what is it. I >>have no problem in dealing with what ever you have heard or think you heard. >>This is your opportunity to make a difference if you so desire, >>I look forward to your message. >Somehow, I seriously doubt it. >>Mike Halvorson >KJ> I reported this to Impulse where I was told, "It doesn't happen here." >KJ> So, I thought screw it. >Well, you not alone in that respect. The problem I ran into in 2.0 had apparently been fixed (based on testimony from a few emails I received) in 3.x. Thats all well and fine, however, the gist of the discussion was Impulse's responsiveness to users. I have bought most Impulse products since Turbo Silver and bought every collection of 3D objects, fonts, and utilities they offered. (I even bought sweatshirts.) The only thing I have ever become disappointed with was VoRecOne, because there was never a VoRecTwo. I like Imagine. For our video work I've had to move to Lightwave for animation, but I still use Imagine, because I greatly prefer the Detail editor to Lightwave's Modeler. I don't get frustrated very easily, and I spend a great deal of time making sure I can duplicate errors and explain problems succinctly when I have to call Tech Support. (I spent a week proofreading the Imagine 0.9/1.0 manual and sent Impulse a tome [40 paragraphs] of corrections and suggestions.) It seems to me that the only time there's any suggestion of responsiveness to the end user is when Mike Halvorson is directly involved. Over the years, most of the other people I've talked to at Impulse Tech Support were rude, short, gruff, or insulting when discussing problems with Imagine. I know I couldn't possibly be the first person to come across every problem I document, so it's no thrill to have Tech Support use the blanket phrase, "It doesn't do that here." which translates to "I don't want to talk to you." If the phone wasn't bad enough, they are totally unresponsive by snail-mail unless the envelope contains a check. I have previously sent back disks containing 3D object/fonts collection which I believed were missing objects. When I call to find out what's happening I'm always told they never got it. (The post office can't be that unreliable all the time.) It's a good thing I back up everything I buy, so I'm only out a couple letters in a few fonts. Additionally, I have sent numerous sample projects, objects, and pictures to Impulse and have never received any kind of response to my problems, because (of course) the "never got" the disks. Maybe Mike H. should walk through tech support with a 2x4 and whack a few people upside the head. Bottom line: Impulse's Imagine is wonderful. Impulse's Tech Support is not, unless you're dealing with Mike Halvorson directly. +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ | Kenneth Jennings, Amiga Advocate | | ====== SyntheToonz, Inc & ====== | | "Happy I'm not a PC/Mac lemming." | | ====== Equine Video Studios ====== | | kenneth@daffy.aatech.com | | = Ken, Computer Animation Artiste = | | Applied Automation Techniques, Inc. | | = Lynn, Video Maven = | | Obviously not the opinions of AAT. | | = Bruno The Wonder Dog = | +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ "You'd think that PC and Mac users willing to gut their systems to achieve the Amiga's level of performance would just save themselves the trouble and buy Amigas in the first place. But they don't know any better -- they read BYTE." @{" Thread 165" link IML-165} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-189 " MSG-189 Subject: Re: Candle @toc contents Subject: Re: Candle Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 17:50:58 From: plucas@vt.edu (Perry Lucas) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >[CJO's candle flame question] > >I made an animation of a candle a while back, which came out pretty >nice. > >Take your basic candle-flame ellipsoid shape and add the following >attributes: > > Fog Length: 0.10 > > Texture: Ghost > Over the past few days, I have noticed a bunch of people posting these howto's for simple objects (photon torpeodo's, shields, etc.) Although I do not have much time in my life, I would like to put a booklet out of all these little tidbits. I can easily format them nicely through AmiPro, print them out, and get them binded down at the copy center. The only cost would be for the copying, binding, and shipping. It would be a lot nicer than the thousands of printouts that you and I have scattered about our work areas. Any thoughts? --Perry _,_/| \o.O; ------------------------------------------oOO =(___)= OOo------ Perry J.Lucas U Emails: plucas@vt.edu "PJ" on Diversity University plucas@raven.cybercom.com Telnet: moo.du.org 8888 lucasp@erau.db.erau.edu HTML Hompage: http://erau.db.erau.edu:80/~lucasp @{" Thread 194" link IML-194} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-190 " MSG-190 Subject: Re: Candle @toc contents Subject: Re: Candle Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 19:46:15 From: dalamar@MIT.EDU (Craig Andera ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Over the past few days, I have noticed a bunch of people posting these >howto's for simple objects (photon torpeodo's, shields, etc.) Although >I do not have much time in my life, I would like to put a booklet out of >all these little tidbits. I can easily format them nicely through AmiPro, >print them out, and get them binded down at the copy center. The only >cost would be for the copying, binding, and shipping. It would be a lot >nicer than the thousands of printouts that you and I have scattered about >our work areas. Any thoughts? > >--Perry > I think this is a great idea. As a beginning -> intermediate user, I know I usually grab anything that looks interesting off the list, save it, and try it later. I've come across quite a few things that I would never have figured out on my own this way, and quite a few others that would have taken me a long time. Perhaps even better than binding it would be to create some sort of electronic archive. I know the archives for this list already exist, but having one that contains only the "tidbits" and "howtos" would save a lot of sifting, and provide people like me with a really information-dense jumping off point. Plus, it cuts out the printing, binding, and mailing. We just need to find some anonymous ftp site or set up some kind of auto-mailer. And it allows for frequent updates. Maybe a WWW page? Are browsers for the Amiga widely available? Just a few thoughts. -Craig @{" Thread 204" link IML-204} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-191 " MSG-191 Subject: IMAGINE 3.2 ? @toc contents Subject: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 20:22:59 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -> From: Shane Davison -> -> Isn't Imagine 3.2 supposed to be out by now ? -> So far, my $100 has only brought me _one_ new -> (and minor) upgrade and the Constant Upgrade -> period is almost over ! Any info about 3.2 -> is appreciated. I won't mind if they've made -> it Windows compatible... =2E..this brings up a question I don't think has been answered before= . I'm a naturally suspicious guy...and learned never pay the mechanic BEFORE the work is done, so I haven't joined the Impulse auto-upgrade "deal". However, I'm curious how Impulse is going to pull this thing off. They say for $100 you get atleast 4 updates from May to May. It = has been my experience that Impulse generally takes 2 years to get from o= ne major release to another. Also, at the rate they are going now, (v3.0= , v3.1, v3.2 etc.) those people who paid $100 will only get v3.3 (if th= ey are lucky) before the year period is over. Then I assume they will no= t receive v3.4, v3.5, v3.6 etc. but will receive v4.0 when it's done. So how does one get the other upgrades prior to 4.0 without having to pay another $100? A better deal would be to offer 4 minor updates between 3.0 and 4.0 with the option of choosing which 4 they want (ba= sed on the features added). I think Impulse should be upfront about the reality that full release versions don't come on a yearly time table. In fact, it is my impress= ion that Impulse doesn't even have a timetable, since "2 weeks" to them c= an mean anything from 3 to 6 months. :) _______________________________________________________ /_________________________________________________________\ /=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\ =3D| Mike van der Sommen || Email: = |=3D =3D| GraFX Haus BBS || mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com = |=3D =3D| Santa Barbara, Ca. || ______________________________________ = |=3D =3D| "..where the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse play golf..." = |=3D =3D|_______________________________________________________________= |=3D --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 231" link IML-231} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-192 " MSG-192 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 20:46:04 From: Douglas Rudd ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I believe Impulse may have taken a first step towards solving the problem of supporting the lowest common denominator in machines: IM L/T. Perhaps Impulse should let Imagine diverge into two separate entities -- a program for the low end that offers a lot of features for the money but will work on most machines, and a version for the high end market that costs more but offers MUCH more and requires the hardware to support it. I would prefere to remain with one program and focus my skills with that one tool, but as it stands, I must use LW for rendering and IM for modeling in order to be productive (thanking God for Interchange). While I'm here, I'll sound off a little about the some of the whining and back biting towards Impulse. They are a small company. I've called them perhaps a dozen times and I've ended up speaking with Mike about five times. Call Alias or AutoDesk and see if you ever end up talking with the owner, even by appointment. Impulse doesn't have the capital to support a full time service that can answer you with "Good Morning, this is Impulse. How may we help you today?" I'm sure they could provide it if we are willing to pay for it in the s/w. Impulse just doesn't have the volume to support all the extras and keep their prices down. Mike is fortunate that he didn't find his calling in the diplomatic corps -- his genius is in programing, not PR. On the other hand, we could be less confrontational. Provide inputs, and if Impulse continues to ignore them, we could look else where. That has always been an option. For my part, I wish the IML would limit itself more to comment and info, and forget the flaming. This type of conduct on LW-ML or comp.graphics. packages.lightwave is not tolerated, and believe me, NewTek is not the most responsive company in the market place. Let's focus on what we can achieve; an exchange of information that will help us to extract as much as possible from Imagine, within its limitations. If we act responsibly, perhaps Impulse will work with us to reduce those limitations. Doug Rudd ------------------------------------------------------------------------ :-) I think I'll write a letter to my congressman. :-| A congressman has two ends: a sitting end and a thinking end; and since his entire future depends on his seat, why bother friend.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ @{" Thread 146" link IML-146} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-193 " MSG-193 Subject: Re: IML tidbits (was Candle) @toc contents Subject: Re: IML tidbits (was Candle) Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 21:24:54 From: Shane Davison ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Over the past few days, I have noticed a bunch of people posting these >howto's for simple objects (photon torpeodo's, shields, etc.) Although >I do not have much time in my life, I would like to put a booklet out of >all these little tidbits. I can easily format them nicely through AmiPro, >print them out, and get them binded down at the copy center. The only >cost would be for the copying, binding, and shipping. It would be a lot >nicer than the thousands of printouts that you and I have scattered about >our work areas. Any thoughts? >--Perry Well, I've collected _all_ the step-by-step (and other significant) things to try in Imagine from _all_ the IML archives (# 0-57). The only stuff I may have missed occasionally were "Essence-only" tidbits (because I don't own it). Now, since this was to be only for personal use, I only copied the helpful info and didn't include the author/poster. Due to school, etc, I don't have enough time to go through and attach the author to his/her useful info (which, IMO, should be done but shouldn't take too much time using text searches). If anyone is interested in this *and* would like to sort/credit/etc the text, I'd be happy to upload/mail it to you. But if others are going to make use of it, I'd really like to see the author's name included. I was quite a competent Turbo Silver user and thus was not a total Imagine newbie when I bought 3.0. But there is no question that the information contained in the IML archives was invaluable to me and many others. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank each and every IML member who has contributed in any positive way to this list. Regards, -- Shane Davison (tsml) daviso@cs.uregina.ca @{" Thread 278" link IML-278} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-194 " MSG-194 Subject: Re: Candle @toc contents Subject: Re: Candle Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 23:02:55 From: Douglas Rudd ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Over the past few days, I have noticed a bunch of people posting these > howto's for simple objects (photon torpeodo's, shields, etc.) Although > I do not have much time in my life, I would like to put a booklet out of > all these little tidbits. I can easily format them nicely through AmiPro, > print them out, and get them binded down at the copy center. The only > cost would be for the copying, binding, and shipping. It would be a lot > nicer than the thousands of printouts that you and I have scattered about > our work areas. Any thoughts? > Why not an AmigaGuide file? Cost? Just time. Risk? None. Could be very useful. Doug Rudd rudd@plk.af.mil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Amiga Guide to the Galaxy refers to Commodore's management as "A bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first to be lined up against the wall and shot when the revolution comes." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- They will get my Amiga from me when they pry it from my cold, dead hands. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @{" Thread 186" link IML-186} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-195 " MSG-195 Subject: Online Docs, was RE: Candle @toc contents Subject: Online Docs, was RE: Candle Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 23:30:09 From: Kenneth Jennings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Andera wrote about Re: Candle >>Over the past few days, I have noticed a bunch of people posting these >>howto's for simple objects (photon torpeodo's, shields, etc.) Although >>I do not have much time in my life, I would like to put a booklet out of >>all these little tidbits. I can easily format them nicely through AmiPro, >>print them out, and get them binded down at the copy center. The only >>cost would be for the copying, binding, and shipping. It would be a lot >>nicer than the thousands of printouts that you and I have scattered about >>our work areas. Any thoughts? >> >>--Perry >I think this is a great idea. [...] Dittos. >Perhaps even better than binding it would be to create some sort of >electronic archive. [...] >Maybe a WWW page? Maybe an AmigaGuide document. That would be really useful. >Are browsers for the Amiga widely available? Yup. See the March 95 AmigaWhirled :-) for a description of everything you need on the Amiga to use Mosaic. >Just a few thoughts. >-Craig +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ | Kenneth Jennings, Amiga Advocate | | ====== SyntheToonz, Inc & ====== | | "Happy I'm not a PC/Mac lemming." | | ====== Equine Video Studios ====== | | kenneth@daffy.aatech.com | | = Ken, Computer Animation Artiste = | | Applied Automation Techniques, Inc. | | = Lynn, Video Maven = | | Obviously not the opinions of AAT. | | = Bruno The Wonder Dog = | +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ "You'd think that PC and Mac users willing to gut their systems to achieve the Amiga's level of performance would just save themselves the trouble and buy Amigas in the first place. But they don't know any better -- they read BYTE." @{" Thread 221" link IML-221} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-196 " MSG-196 Subject: Good turbulent gas effect?? @toc contents Subject: Good turbulent gas effect?? Date: Thursday, 09 February 1995 23:37:35 From: Scott Krehbiel ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Everybody, I'm trying to make a turbulent gas effect. I tried using a fog object and the Nebula texture (came with Imagine) and I got a kinda neat effect, but it looked more like water than anything else. Actually, it looked just like the sky reflecting off the surface of turbulent water. What I'm trying to represent is called Reactive Ion Etching, where a gas is bombarded with Radio waves, ionizing it and making it etch a surface. I'm not about to try to micro-animate this, but would like to get a nice plasma effect on the gas. Any suggestions for getting a "dangerous gas that would etch things" effect??? I think turbulence would be good, as it would illustrate the fact that the gas is doing something... not just sitting around. Thanks in advance, Scott Krehbiel scott@umbc7.umbc.edu @{" Thread 317" link IML-317} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-197 " MSG-197 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 00:15:19 From: Alan_Gordie@pcmailgw.ml.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- i think this is a great idea...maybe a WWW site or maybe a compressed text file in the layout of a book(e.g. table of contents, index, etc.) also, i would gladly offer my windows database programming experience to the cause of developing an updateable "booklet of tidbits". all of the tidbits could be formatted in ascii format such that they could be easily imported into a database. (Amiga or IBM) just an idea, no flames please :) later, alan_gordie@ml.com ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: Candle Author: dalamar@MIT.EDU (Craig Andera ) at PROFGTWY Date: 2/9/95 11:00 AM >Over the past few days, I have noticed a bunch of people posting these >howto's for simple objects (photon torpeodo's, shields, etc.) Although >I do not have much time in my life, I would like to put a booklet out of >all these little tidbits. I can easily format them nicely through AmiPro, >print them out, and get them binded down at the copy center. The only >cost would be for the copying, binding, and shipping. It would be a lot >nicer than the thousands of printouts that you and I have scattered about >our work areas. Any thoughts? > >--Perry > I think this is a great idea. As a beginning -> intermediate user, I know I usually grab anything that looks interesting off the list, save it, and try it later. I've come across quite a few things that I would never have figured out on my own this way, and quite a few others that would have taken me a long time. Perhaps even better than binding it would be to create some sort of electronic archive. I know the archives for this list already exist, but having one that contains only the "tidbits" and "howtos" would save a lot of sifting, and provide people like me with a really information-dense jumping off point. Plus, it cuts out the printing, binding, and mailing. We just need to find some anonymous ftp site or set up some kind of auto-mailer. And it allows for frequent updates. Maybe a WWW page? Are browsers for the Amiga widely available? Just a few thoughts. -Craig @{" Thread 224" link IML-224} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-198 " MSG-198 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 04:23:45 From: dalamar@MIT.EDU (Craig Andera ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, considering the number of positive responses in the few hours since the original posts, it looks like the idea is a pretty popular one. I just want to put in a word for the PC users, like myself: an Amiga guide file is of limited utility to us, unless anyone knows of a viewer for DOS/Windows. I realize that this list consists in large part of Amiga users (and having read for a while now, I've gained tons of respect for the Amiga), hence my comment about the availability of Amiga browsers. Anyway, if someone does get around to organizing the tidbits, please keep the Amiga-impaired like myself in mind. @{" Thread 247" link IML-247} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-199 " MSG-199 Subject: Re: Online Docs, was RE: Candle @toc contents Subject: Re: Online Docs, was RE: Candle Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 05:11:34 From: Michael Hazlett ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >I think this is a great idea. > [...] > > Dittos. > > > >Perhaps even better than binding it would be to create some sort of > >electronic archive. > [...] > Maybe an AmigaGuide document. That would be really useful. > > > >Are browsers for the Amiga widely available? AMIGAGUIDE!! AMIGAGUIDE!! :) MH @{" Thread 81" link IML-81} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-200 " MSG-200 Subject: Textures @toc contents Subject: Textures Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 05:37:24 From: Michael Hazlett ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Recently I seen some tutes on making dissapating shields....but in the tute it used the textures..... Bandturb SwapCRF Solid Ok I have Bandturb....but if the other ones are Essence textures I never got 'em....If it's legal can someone UL the textures...Solid & SwapCRF to me please... Thanks Guyz MH @{" Thread 322" link IML-322} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-201 " MSG-201 Subject: 3D Artist @toc contents Subject: 3D Artist Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 06:08:36 From: gareth.qually@beect.iaccess.za (Gareth Qually) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to everyone for helping me out with the details of the mag. Perry Lucas suggested a compiled book of IML tips and hints. This sounds great, i would like to get one. But being outside Perry's country inhibits my ability to send a self addressed envelope with his countrys' stamp on it. Also a small charge for the booklet would not justify the charges I would get changing currencies (in South Africa we still have exchange controls). What about sending it via e-mail to people who wanted it, hey Perry? I use AmiPro as well so the format wouldn't be a problem. If you can Perry I would be most grateful. Chow... gareth.qually@beect.iaccess.za P.S. Is Seaquest really a commercial flop in the States? @{" Thread 116" link IML-116} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-202 " MSG-202 Subject: Locomotive objects @toc contents Subject: Locomotive objects Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 06:47:57 From: peter.borcherds@beect.iaccess.za (Peter Borcherds) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi there I am looking for any Imagine objects of locomotives (steam or diesel) - preferably very detailed. If anyone knows of the location of such objects could they please let me know. Another thing I have been trying - I want to model the inside of a house - complete with furniture - to help with interior design. I've tried various methods, but they have all given me problems due to speed of rendering, etc. Anyone have any ideas? - and while I am on the subject, how can I make objects of a couch and a TV (needs to be reasonably detailed) I am a relative newie to Imagine (3.0) with very little model building experience, so any bit of help would be appreciated. Thanks Peter Borcherds peter.borcherds@beect.iaccess.za ** UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY - PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHAREWARE CONCEPT ** --- | AmiQWK 2.3 | Help! I've fallen and I can't get down! - James Brown @{" Thread 255" link IML-255} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-203 " MSG-203 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 07:25:08 From: ThreeDTV@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes I agree. Impulse is a small company and it does respond to suggestions that ARE implemented in later versions of the software. I have talked to MH on numerous occasions and he was always upfront and straight foward. Of course this approach will turn off many people if they are used to "sugarcoated" responses. My suggestion for Impulse is it is OK for Mike to be short but it is certainly not OK for his tech staff to be gruff. They have NO right be. @{" Thread 149" link IML-149} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-204 " MSG-204 Subject: Re: Candle @toc contents Subject: Re: Candle Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 07:46:33 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mike Rivers If you have I3.X, here's a free candle tip: Make a brushmap with a vertical gadient from the white(top) to black(bottom). Then make another brushmap that is solid white. Apply the gradient map to the candle as a 'reflectivity' map and appy the solid white map as a 'reflection' map. This makes the candle stick glow like a real lit candle. ------------------------------------------------------------ Umm, wouldn't it be simpler to replace those two brushmaps with the Linear texture, fading the color to white as you get closer to the top of the candle? @{" Thread 189" link IML-189} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-205 " MSG-205 Subject: Re: IMAGINE 3.2 ? @toc contents Subject: Re: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 07:47:43 From: ThreeDTV@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have been informed from Impulse that the upgrade program for $100 will get you to version 4.0 of Imagine if you have version 3.0 to start with. @{" Thread 419" link IML-419} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-206 " MSG-206 Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs Imagine Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 08:17:41 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kenneth Jennings ------------------------------------------------------------ I agree 100%. Impulse's tech support is abysmal. They promise to phone back, but never do. They promise to pass faxes on to XYZ, XYZ never gets them. You describe any problem, (my communications skills are legendary at the office and online) and they complain they can't understand, then ask you to send them a scene on disk. You send them disks -- black hole from hell. Why do you think I became so good at solving Imagine problems? Because I never got any help from their phone line, that's what. In all honesty, I must add that online support is much better than their phone tech line. Sometimes Mike needs a couple of messages to understand user questions, but he often follows through with an answer. Mike, if you're reading this, how on earth have these rude, incompetent people managed to keep their job this long? Are you really oblivious to the number of people who, through the years, have been turned off Imagine forever because of their personal tech support horror stories? @{" Thread 161" link IML-161} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-207 " MSG-207 Subject: Imagine tidbits @toc contents Subject: Imagine tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 08:25:13 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Perry Lucas Over the past few days, I have noticed a bunch of people posting these howto's for simple objects (photon torpeodo's, shields, etc.) Although I do not have much time in my life, I would like to put a booklet out of all these little tidbits. I can easily format them nicely through AmiPro, print them out, and get them binded down at the copy center. The only cost would be for the copying, binding, and shipping. It would be a lot nicer than the thousands of printouts that you and I have scattered about our work areas. Any thoughts? ------------------------------------------------------------ Some would prefer a printed booklet, but I vote for the compendium to be published in electronic format. Two reasons: easier to update, and searchable. @{" Thread 89" link IML-89} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-208 " MSG-208 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 08:47:46 From: Robert Iacullo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here, here. On Thu, 9 Feb 1995, Douglas Rudd wrote: > I believe Impulse may have taken a first step towards solving the problem > of supporting the lowest common denominator in machines: IM L/T. Perhaps > Impulse should let Imagine diverge into two separate entities -- a program > for the low end that offers a lot of features for the money but will work > on most machines, and a version for the high end market that costs more but > offers MUCH more and requires the hardware to support it. I would prefere > to remain with one program and focus my skills with that one tool, but as > it stands, I must use LW for rendering and IM for modeling in order to be > productive (thanking God for Interchange). > > While I'm here, I'll sound off a little about the some of the whining and > back biting towards Impulse. They are a small company. I've called them > perhaps a dozen times and I've ended up speaking with Mike about five times. > Call Alias or AutoDesk and see if you ever end up talking with the owner, > even by appointment. Impulse doesn't have the capital to support a full time > service that can answer you with "Good Morning, this is Impulse. How may > we help you today?" I'm sure they could provide it if we are willing > to pay for it in the s/w. Impulse just doesn't have the volume to support > all the extras and keep their prices down. Mike is fortunate that he didn't > find his calling in the diplomatic corps -- his genius is in programing, > not PR. On the other hand, we could be less confrontational. Provide inputs, > and if Impulse continues to ignore them, we could look else where. That has > always been an option. > > For my part, I wish the IML would limit itself more to comment and info, > and forget the flaming. This type of conduct on LW-ML or comp.graphics. > packages.lightwave is not tolerated, and believe me, NewTek is not the > most responsive company in the market place. Let's focus on what we can > achieve; an exchange of information that will help us to extract as much > as possible from Imagine, within its limitations. If we act responsibly, > perhaps Impulse will work with us to reduce those limitations. > > > > Doug Rudd > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > :-) I think I'll write a letter to my congressman. > > :-| A congressman has two ends: a sitting end and a thinking end; > and since his entire future depends on his seat, why bother friend.... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > @{" Thread 106" link IML-106} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-209 " MSG-209 Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine(brushmap transparency "bug") @toc contents Subject: RE: LW vs Imagine(brushmap transparency "bug") Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 09:23:04 From: Charles Blaquiere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ted Stethem Well, after all that, guess what? Now, somehow RSDP affects the transparency of brushmaps! in Scanline mode no less! Try setting your RSDP to something like 16 or more then try rendering your overlapping tree brushmaps. It will work! But not without a subsequent cost in rendering time. Do you have a bald spot on your head where you have been scratching to figure out why Imagine is not working the way you expect or is documented to work? ------------------------------------------------------------ Ted, here's my educated guess. In 2.9, Imagine exhibited transparency bugs which, if memory serves me right, were caused by an attempt to improve the backdrop code. (Users were complaining that backdrops would not show behind transparent or semi-transparent objects) Impulse has been working on the situation, and is actually moving towards actual alpha channel support, where your objects' opacity becomes an 8-bit greyscale image. This will allow the backdrop to show perfectly, with varying amounts depending on the cumulative opacity of any/all objects in the scene. My guess is that the upcoming alpha channel support is the reason why Resolve Depth now affects scanline mode and transparency maps. @{" Thread 206" link IML-206} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-210 " MSG-210 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 09:48:37 From: "Anime a day..." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 9 Feb 1995, Craig Andera wrote: > Well, considering the number of positive responses in the few hours since > the original posts, it looks like the idea is a pretty popular one. > > I just want to put in a word for the PC users, like myself: an Amiga guide > file is of limited utility to us, unless anyone knows of a viewer for > DOS/Windows. I realize that this list consists in large part of Amiga > users (and having read for a while now, I've gained tons of respect for the > Amiga), hence my comment about the availability of Amiga browsers. > > Anyway, if someone does get around to organizing the tidbits, please keep > the Amiga-impaired like myself in mind. > You can still read the amigaguide files with any ascii text reader but you will have some delimiters scattered through it.. but the body of it will still be usefull.. Sometimes when doing a word search I do that with an amigaguide format file just to get the info I need and print it out fast... Bill @{" Thread 245" link IML-245} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-211 " MSG-211 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 11:28:05 From: zmievski@herbie.unl.edu (Silicon) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > i think this is a great idea...maybe a WWW site or maybe a compressed > text file in the layout of a book(e.g. table of contents, index, etc.) I could host it at my WWW site. If someone takes time to make the initial WWW page, I can put it on my site. Andrey @{" Thread 210" link IML-210} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-212 " MSG-212 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 12:44:56 From: Shane Davison ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- GREG BILKE wrote: > As an Imagine newbie, I find myself switching back and forth from the manual > and numerous print-outs of interesting ideas and tutorials found on IML and > other resources. > > I like the idea of an AmigaGuide version of tips and ideas because it would > be able to take advantage AmigaGuide's hypertext capabilities and would be > easy to maintain and distribute. The only problem is I would have to run > it in the backround while using Imagine and bounce back and forth between > screens or print out the page. > > A small bound booklet would serve my needs best by reducing clutter from > printouts and being in front of my face while working in Imagine's editors. Well, I've had a few requests for my Imagine tidbits and I've come to a decision. Since I truely feel that the authors of all these great tips and hints deserve credit for them, I will go through and compile a text version of this "Imagine Compendium" which will include the authors. I will then send this via e-mail to anyone who requests it and upload it if desired. From then on, you can do with it what you will - make an AmigaGuide version, a html version, a multimedia version, a printed booklet, etc. - under one condition: that I get credit for compiling the text. Since I've spent well over 100 hours slowly reading every word of the last 58 IML archives (0-57, 13 megs, almost 10,000 msg.s) and since I'm putting in the time and effort to organize it, I think this is only fair. Just to clarify: I don't have _all_ the tricks, tips, hints, work-arounds, etc. from the IML archives - there are far too many and you might as well just get all the archives and search for the desired phrase. What I do have is anything (mildly) interesting that one could try with Imagine (sort of like some of Mr. Worley's appendix notes in UI2.0). This includes tutorials, how-to's, try this, etc. If this is not what you were looking for, then someone else will have to go through all the archives and extract the desired info but you'll need a lot of luck (and time) to get them all. However, I might take requests if there's anything that's really important that I may have left out (in fact, I just did something like this a couple of weeks ago when I searched all the archives and extracted all the info related to creating realistic CD's in Imagine). Please let me know what you think. I have some time this weekend and next week so I could get started very soon... Regards, -- Shane Davison (tsml) daviso@cs.uregina.ca @{" Thread 230" link IML-230} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-213 " MSG-213 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 12:49:58 From: Angus Carson ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 9 Feb 1995 ThreeDTV@aol.com wrote: > course this approach will turn off many people if they are used to > "sugarcoated" responses. My suggestion for Impulse is it is OK for Mike to be > short but it is certainly not OK for his tech staff to be gruff. They have NO > right be. Short? So this means he can call people insulting names, question thier intelligence, and claim that he's always right? Sorry, WRONG. That's not how you represent a company much less represent yourself. @{" Thread 208" link IML-208} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-214 " MSG-214 Subject: Computer objects @toc contents Subject: Computer objects Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 13:10:10 From: CaptKurt@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am in need of computer objects. CPU cases, Monitors, keyboards, mice, cables, disk drives. Any part or wholes that anyone may have or know of. I have a nice Amiga 3000, and a couple of good monitors. I would like to get a PC - type, as well as a Macintosh, and SGIs, Suns, and any other workstation models. Thanks, Kurt Knippel Creative Director High Impact Productions @{" Thread 55" link IML-55} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-215 " MSG-215 Subject: Re: Tree's @toc contents Subject: Re: Tree's Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 14:09:40 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On my question about tree-maker's Alan Gordie answered; >have you tried LPARSER3.ZIP, ibelieve you can find it at avalon... >it lets you grow trees, ferns, bugs, fish, lobsters and anything else you >can stumble across while using it. Thanks! I have found it and installed here at work and it works fine. But I would really like something for my Amiga as well. Anyone? Conny Joensson Kiruna, Sweden @{" Thread 432" link IML-432} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-216 " MSG-216 Subject: Re: Candle @toc contents Subject: Re: Candle Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 15:05:03 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>If you have I3.X, here's a free candle tip: Make a brushmap with >>a vertical gadient from the white(top) to black(bottom). >>Then make another brushmap that is solid white. Apply the gradient >>map to the candle as a 'reflectivity' map and appy the solid white >>map as a 'reflection' map. This makes the candle stick glow >>like a real lit candle. >Umm, wouldn't it be simpler to replace those two brushmaps with the >Linear texture, fading the color to white as you get closer to the top >of the candle? You can't _fade_ reflectivity or reflection in a texture, can you? Conny Joensson ** .sig under reconstruction ** @{" Thread 459" link IML-459} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-217 " MSG-217 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 15:17:24 From: James Brooks ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 9 Feb 1995, GREG BILKE wrote: > > As an Imagine newbie, I find myself switching back and forth from the manual > and numerous print-outs of interesting ideas and tutorials found on IML and > other resources. > > I like the idea of an AmigaGuide version of tips and ideas because it would > be able to take advantage AmigaGuide's hypertext capabilities and would be > easy to maintain and distribute. The only problem is I would have to run > it in the backround while using Imagine and bounce back and forth between > screens or print out the page. Just a thought, is there a way to 'shanghai' the screen which Imagine is running on? I am guessing the AmigaGuide is a resizable/movable window and it would be nice. Like I said, just a thought. ;-) Alex --------------------------------------------------------------- James "Alex" Brooks Amiga 4000/040/28MHz 20MB RAM Lightwave 3.5 / Imagine 3.0 VideoToaster 4000 3.1 Sysquest 3.5" 270MB Bernoulli 90Pro NEC 3xp Triple Speed CDROM Warp Engine 4028 Epson ES-600C Scanner E-Mail: jamesb@clark.net -------------------------------------------------------------- @{" Thread 264" link IML-264} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-218 " MSG-218 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 15:47:11 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Those of you on the IML that are interested in getting a www site or possibly a ftp archive to get the IML tidbits from; Send me an email!! I might (just might) be able to do something about this. But before I do I'd like to check if there is any real interest from the Imagine community. So, if you like the idea and think that you would utilize the service, drop me a line (or two). Conny Joensson cjo@esrange.ssc.se @{" Thread 217" link IML-217} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-219 " MSG-219 Subject: PC Shareware?? other textures? @toc contents Subject: PC Shareware?? other textures? Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 16:55:53 From: imagine ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, I have been using Imagine 3.0 on PC for a while, and apart from my gripes about not being able to get the constant upgrade in the UK (if anyone can help I would be grateful) I think that it is a wonderful product. Quick question. There seem to be many textures available as add-ons for the amiga product. Are there any for the PC if so where can I get them ?? Best Andrew Stagg. -- @{" Thread 361" link IML-361} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-220 " MSG-220 Subject: How to books (was Re: Candle @toc contents Subject: How to books (was Re: Candle Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 17:39:09 From: Waland J F ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- plucas@vt.edu wrote >Over the past few days, I have noticed a bunch of people posting these >howto's for simple objects (photon torpeodo's, shields, etc.) Although >I do not have much time in my life, I would like to put a booklet out of >all these little tidbits. I can easily format them nicely through AmiPro, what about the faq? or a modification of it. jon @{" Thread 172" link IML-172} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-221 " MSG-221 Subject: Re: Online Docs, was RE: Candle @toc contents Subject: Re: Online Docs, was RE: Candle Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 18:22:28 From: Michael ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >I think this is a great idea. > > [...] > > > > Dittos. > > > > > > >Perhaps even better than binding it would be to create some sort of > > >electronic archive. > > [...] > > Maybe an AmigaGuide document. That would be really useful. > > > > > > >Are browsers for the Amiga widely available? > > AMIGAGUIDE!! AMIGAGUIDE!! :) > > MH > Yes, definitly AMIGAGUIDE. - Michael |I don't have ideas | wccma1@cf.ac.uk | - I Imagine !! | *** NEWS FLASH *** .sig extension under constuction... @{" Thread 199" link IML-199} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-222 " MSG-222 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 19:19:38 From: Michael ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- hi, Count me in for a copy, I've only had Imagine a fortnight and am willing to accept any and all tips from seasoned users. I'm willing to proof read if this is needed. - Michael |I don't have ideas | wccma1@cf.ac.uk | - I Imagine !! | *** NEWS FLASH *** .sig extension under constuction... @{" Thread 288" link IML-288} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-223 " MSG-223 Subject: Imagine Cookbook @toc contents Subject: Imagine Cookbook Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 19:30:31 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -> From: plucas@vt.edu (Perry Lucas) -> Over the past few days, I have noticed a bunch of people posting t= hes -> howto's for simple objects (photon torpeodo's, shields, etc.) Alt= hou -> I do not have much time in my life, I would like to put a booklet = out -> all these little tidbits. I can easily format them nicely through= Am -> print them out, and get them binded down at the copy center. The = onl -> cost would be for the copying, binding, and shipping. It would be= a -> nicer than the thousands of printouts that you and I have scattere= d a -> our work areas. Any thoughts? Sounds like an excellent idea. You could call it the Imagine Cookbook= .:) _______________________________________________________ /_________________________________________________________\ /=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\ =3D| Mike van der Sommen || Email: = |=3D =3D| GraFX Haus BBS || mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com = |=3D =3D| Santa Barbara, Ca. || ______________________________________ = |=3D =3D| "..where the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse play golf..." = |=3D =3D|_______________________________________________________________= |=3D --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 251" link IML-251} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-224 " MSG-224 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 20:01:43 From: wilks@lbm.com (Stephen Wilkinson) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello! I must add my vote here for HTML. It is "portable" and easy to get viewers for different platforms. Even Unix/Linux if I need 'em :) Stephen ____________________________________ Stephen Wilkinson wilks@lbm.com "Programming is like pinball. The Sr. Software Engineer reward for doing it well is the LB&M Associates opportunity to do it again." ____________________________________ #define OPINION (myown) #define COMPANYOPINION (~myown) This message created using 87% recycled neuro-transmitters MicroSoft(n): From latin Micro (small or tiny) and Soft (limp or flaccid) @{" Thread 242" link IML-242} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-225 " MSG-225 Subject: Imagine Improvements was IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Imagine Improvements was IML Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 20:14:38 From: Kenneth Jennings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- James Brooks wrote about Re: IML Tidbits: >On Thu, 9 Feb 1995, GREG BILKE wrote: [...] >> I like the idea of an AmigaGuide version of tips and ideas because it would >> be able to take advantage AmigaGuide's hypertext capabilities and would be >> easy to maintain and distribute. The only problem is I would have to run >> it in the backround while using Imagine and bounce back and forth between >> screens or print out the page. >Just a thought, is there a way to 'shanghai' the screen which Imagine is >running on? I am guessing the AmigaGuide is a resizable/movable window >and it would be nice. > >Like I said, just a thought. ;-) > >Alex Add this to the Imagine wish-list I guess. Imagine should use a public screen. Additionally, might as well let Imagine properly observe the display/monitors database to make it easier to run Imagine on higher resolution displays (which would also facilitate running Imagine's Editors on third-party display devices without resorting to voodoo.) +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ | Kenneth Jennings, Amiga Advocate | | ====== SyntheToonz, Inc & ====== | | "Happy I'm not a PC/Mac lemming." | | ====== Equine Video Studios ====== | | kenneth@daffy.aatech.com | | = Ken, Computer Animation Artiste = | | Applied Automation Techniques, Inc. | | = Lynn, Video Maven = | | Obviously not the opinions of AAT. | | = Bruno The Wonder Dog = | +-------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------+ "You'd think that PC and Mac users willing to gut their systems to achieve the Amiga's level of performance would just save themselves the trouble and buy Amigas in the first place. But they don't know any better -- they read BYTE." @{" Thread 31" link IML-31} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-226 " MSG-226 Subject: Re[2]: Booklet of Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re[2]: Booklet of Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 21:28:35 From: Alan_Gordie_at_JX2ASYS@pcmailgw.ml.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- who would update and format the various tidbits.... perhaps you could run some type of mailer-daemon which parsed the messages into threads based upon some keyword(s) which everyone decides upon (e.g. HowTo, WatchOutFor, AttribSettings, etc.) in the subject line. then the www page would be dynamically built every x number of minutes by this mailer-daemon thingie.. just an idea.. :) alan_gordie@ml.com ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Author: zmievski@herbie.unl.edu (Silicon) at PROFGTWY Date: 2/10/95 4:12 AM > i think this is a great idea...maybe a WWW site or maybe a compressed > text file in the layout of a book(e.g. table of contents, index, etc.) I could host it at my WWW site. If someone takes time to make the initial WWW page, I can put it on my site. Andrey @{" Thread 112" link IML-112} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-227 " MSG-227 Subject: Ideas on how to make chaotic cigarette smoke @toc contents Subject: Ideas on how to make chaotic cigarette smoke Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 21:28:38 From: rbyrne@3dform.edex.edu.au (Robert Byrne) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- In article <9501087922.AA792263979@pcmailgw.ml.com> Alan_Gordie_at_JX2ASYS@pcmailgw.ml.com writes: > thanks to everyone who replied re: the Disco Ball... all of your > suggestions work great. > > > > ....BTW, any ideas on how to make chaotic cigarette smoke??? Hello Allan, here's a couple of suggestions I've found, but can't take credit for. I've tested the Particles method but 1 frame took about 23 hours to render on an A3000. The texture method would be worth trying first. SIMULATING SMOKE WITH PARTICLES Check this Tutorial out: -Detail Editor -add primitives: sphere -attributes: color 128,128,128 fog 180 CLRNOIZ TEXTURE: color 64,64,64 r,g,b,color vary 0 -particles: cube random align interpolated dimension 150 units -save object -Action Editor -add particle effect to loaded sphere (to all anim frames) (TOT == number of frames) emission travel distance 100 units scaling 1 time to terminal h 2 elasticity 50 time to terminal z TOT velocity .5 min angle x -5 max angle x 5 wind velocity 5 wind angle 33 wind start -TOT (minus TOT) wind stop TOT emission 95% SET ALL OTHER VALUES TO 0 REMEMBER: add a backdrop picture, plane or something else behind the particle object because it is a fog obj!!! -- do you want see a blank/black screen? SMOKE (GAS) USING THE NEBULAR TEXTURE I've just been playing with the Nebular texture to create a little animated smoke. Works great, and I just thought some of you with 3.0 might make some use of this info. Remember to render fog objects in front of a background object, and that this texture will apply to the area bounded by the texture axis, not the entire object. Scale the texture axis to affect the shape of the fog. General Notes: Noise 1 seems to affect the quality of the swirls. Higher numbers adjust the thickness and reduce the transparency. Noise 2 affects color transitions, color intensity of nebular color as set in texture requester, and color mixture, or grain. Grain appears as a very pointillated surface, as if there are thousands of dots of color rather than a smooth gradation or defined boundaries between object and nebula colors. Higher numbers of Noise 2 intensify the nebular color and increase grain. Fog length and the 'T' value work together to determine amount and density of the fog appearing on the object. For stills I would set the 'T' value between .6 and .8, object fog length at .1, and adjust the 'Fog Length at T' to get the right density of fog. I would use the 'T' value combined with some of the noise values to create a fluctuating fog, or even to morph from a dense fog to one very nearly dissipated. A nice, swirly smoke might use the following attributes in the nebular texture requester. I used these on a sphere primitive with diameter of 300, so use that number as a reference to fog length. Object color: R:150 G:150 B:175 Object Fog length: .1 Nebular attributes: Fog Length at T:500 T:.8 Noise 1 Magnitude:5.0 Noise 1 Velocity:1.0 Noise 2 Magnitude:.2 Noise 2 Velocity:10.0 R:150 G:100 B:225 The texture axis forms a square completely inside the sphere object, whose corners touch the inside surface of the sphere. -- Happy Rendering, Bob. : Robert (Bob) Byrne : A3000/25 : vox Ph: +61 66 864324 : : rbyrne@3dform.edex.edu.au : : Ballina, NSW Australia : @{" Thread 18" link IML-18} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-228 " MSG-228 Subject: Re[2]: Booklet of Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re[2]: Booklet of Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 21:43:13 From: Alan_Gordie_at_JX2ASYS@pcmailgw.ml.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- you mentioned that the AmigaGuide format is basically an ascii text file with some delimiters... if someone will mail me the specifications for the AmigaGuide format along with a few sample files, and a decription of how the AmigaGuide viewer operates, i should be able to build a viewer/importer/print utility for us Windoze users. then everyone can be happy :) alan_gordie@ml.com ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Author: "Anime a day..." at UNIXGTWY Date: 2/10/95 2:27 AM On Thu, 9 Feb 1995, Craig Andera wrote: > Well, considering the number of positive responses in the few hours since > the original posts, it looks like the idea is a pretty popular one. > > I just want to put in a word for the PC users, like myself: an Amiga guide > file is of limited utility to us, unless anyone knows of a viewer for > DOS/Windows. I realize that this list consists in large part of Amiga > users (and having read for a while now, I've gained tons of respect for the > Amiga), hence my comment about the availability of Amiga browsers. > > Anyway, if someone does get around to organizing the tidbits, please keep > the Amiga-impaired like myself in mind. > You can still read the amigaguide files with any ascii text reader but you will have some delimiters scattered through it.. but the body of it will still be usefull.. Sometimes when doing a word search I do that with an amigaguide format file just to get the info I need and print it out fast... Bill @{" Thread 226" link IML-226} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-229 " MSG-229 Subject: Imagine Tidbit Booklet @toc contents Subject: Imagine Tidbit Booklet Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 22:11:28 From: plucas@vt.edu (Perry Lucas) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well there seems to have been a huge response to my posting about putting a booklet together. However, there was the question of AmigaGuide, WWW, or a booklet version of the compilation. AmigaGuide would be nice for the Amiga users, but it leaves the pc users in the dust. With WWW, not everyone has access to an HTTP: server, especially since they might be able to connect to the internet while designing a piece. The Booklet problem was that some people live in South Africa and would have rough time getting a copy of it. So, here is the solution. I will do both WWW page and a Booklet of it. I do not know the amigaguide format, so someone would have to work with me on that. Shane Davison (tsml)@ daviso@cs.uregina.ca said that do to the large reponse to my previous posting he would put the IML archive tidbits together that he has. However, as he said, he would not have all of them to put together. So, I will make up a list of different object "howto's" and post them here. If you know how to make them, send me email directly. If you also can, send me a picture of it attached as a file document. (I have the worst time with UUDECODE). I will include the pictures in the HTML version of the tidbits. I do not know how good they will look in Black and White on the document version but I will try. As for the Author's, I would include their names within each object that they post. I had assumed this in the orginal post and did not mention it. I would not take credit for work that was not my own. So, look for a list of objects from either later today or tomorrow. --Perry _,_/| \o.O; ------------------------------------------oOO =(___)= OOo------ Perry J.Lucas U Emails: plucas@vt.edu "PJ" on Diversity University plucas@raven.cybercom.com Telnet: moo.du.org 8888 lucasp@erau.db.erau.edu HTML Hompage: http://erau.db.erau.edu:80/~lucasp @{" Thread 234" link IML-234} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-230 " MSG-230 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 23:03:27 From: sauvp@citi.doc.ca (Patrick Sauvageau) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Those of you on the IML that are interested in getting a www site or >possibly a ftp archive to get the IML tidbits from; >Send me an email!! > >I might (just might) be able to do something about this. But before I do >I'd like to check if there is any real interest from the Imagine community. > >So, if you like the idea and think that you would utilize the service, >drop me a line (or two). > >Conny Joensson >cjo@esrange.ssc.se I think that Aminet is the best place to put this file; This way, it will be visible to the entire Amiga-Imagine community(sp?) and it will be a good advertissing for the list; By the way; I think that a plain ascii text is the best way to hold this kind of information since it's the most versatile format. On the other way; an Imagine only FTP or WWW site (or directory) would be one the greatest things on the Net . ----- Patrick Sauvageau (sauvp@citi.doc.ca) @{" Thread 284" link IML-284} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-231 " MSG-231 Subject: IMAGINE 3.2 ? @toc contents Subject: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Date: Friday, 10 February 1995 23:51:57 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well Imagineer's, here's the response I got from my question about how Impulse was going to pull off the "Constant Upgrade to 4.0" over = the course of ONE YEAR, directly from the BIG CHEESE himself. -> You are wrong, we are shipping 3.2 at the end of next week= , t -> rev of the software will ship in April with 4.0 shipping in May, w= e h -> are still are right on track. Thanks for you support, we will be = gla -> you purchase 4.0 when we begin shipping. -> Mike Halvorson Like Atari says: YOU DO THE MATH. :) (..mark your calendars) _______________________________________________________ /_________________________________________________________\ /=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\ =3D| Mike van der Sommen || Email: = |=3D =3D| GraFX Haus BBS || mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com = |=3D =3D| Santa Barbara, Ca. || ______________________________________ = |=3D =3D| "..where the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse play golf..." = |=3D =3D|_______________________________________________________________= |=3D --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 156" link IML-156} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-232 " MSG-232 Subject: RE: IMAGINE 3.2 ? @toc contents Subject: RE: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 00:03:45 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -> From: craigh@fa.disney.com -> I agree. Imagine is a great deal and great software. I don't thi= nk -> here is disputing that. I think the issue here is not one of how = gre -> software is, how bug free it is, or how fast new releases come out= , b -> one of treating the customer with respect. I think your point is well taken. If I were Impulse, I'd much prefer loyal customers who grumble than customers who simply frisbee their software off a cliff and move over to a competitor. I KNOW Mike Halvorson reads IML since I've hit a nerve more than once and got immediate Email directly from him. I don't think any of the comments lately can be characterized as "whining and flaming", simply loyal us= ers who have legitimate grievences and questions that never seem to be addressed when talking to Impulse's Tech support. Personally, I still use Imagine almost exclusively, and plan to in th= e future. I hope Impulse continues improving Imagine....and really list= ens to it's customers....or the very least, nods it's head once in awhile= . _______________________________________________________ /_________________________________________________________\ /=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\ =3D| Mike van der Sommen || Email: = |=3D =3D| GraFX Haus BBS || mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com = |=3D =3D| Santa Barbara, Ca. || ______________________________________ = |=3D =3D| "..where the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse play golf..." = |=3D =3D|_______________________________________________________________= |=3D --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 205" link IML-205} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-233 " MSG-233 Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine @toc contents Subject: Re: LW vs. Imagine Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 02:28:08 From: Douglas Rudd ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > On Thu, 9 Feb 1995 10:20:00 -0700 (MST), "Douglas Rudd" wrot e: > > > While I'm here, I'll sound off a little about the some of the whining and > > back biting towards Impulse. > In what world do you live in ? This statement appears completely exaggerated t o > me and I am following this list for over a year ... A matter of perspective. I've seen cheap shots taken at Impulse and irrational complaints aired here. Yuo may not feel these comments were inflamatory, but I do. > > > They are a small company. > And to survive they have to adapt to their customers' needs ... > > > I've called them > > perhaps a dozen times and I've ended up speaking with Mike about five times. > Lucky you are living in the US. From abroad this is quite a different story .. . You could try MH on email. > I have sent two faxes to Mr. Halvorson without getting a reply though he told > me before that he would answer the same day he received a message ... > > > Call Alias or AutoDesk and see if you ever end up talking with the owner, > > even by appointment. > That's not the point. The owner there knows probably nothing I'm interested in . > I need a knowledgeable person, can be one of customer support to fit my needs. I think it is the point. You want big company software support with a pr staff to talk you through problems but what you get is someone who programs and also answers the phone -- that person may (or more likely) is not people skilled. Life could (and should) be better, but it isn't. > > > Impulse just doesn't have the volume to support > > all the extras and keep their prices down. > Then why do they tell the public in an advertisement (CGW 12/1994 p.23): > "50 Million Users Won't Be Wrong" ? Well, I seriously doubt they have sold anything approaching 5e7 copies of IM. Maybe 3 orders of magnitude less. I've not seen that add, so I don't know exactly WHAT they were saying there. > > > Mike is fortunate that he didn't > > find his calling in the diplomatic corps -- his genius is in programing, > > not PR. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > to put it mildly: this is an EXAGGERATION .... > if it were not, IMAGINE would be less buggy, would run under OS/2 and not > terminate with the cryptic:" ... call Impulse" when it breaks down. (bite my tongue) > > > On the other hand, we could be less confrontational. > Yes, and he too. If IMPULSE was a little more sensitive towards its own > negligence, bugs and unfulfilled customers' expectations its customers would b e > less frustrated. I found the people on this list extremely helpful, cooperativ e > and patient (exceptions rather rare). > > > Provide inputs, > People on the IML do that ever since I joined it. > > > and if Impulse continues to ignore them, we could look else where. That has > > always been an option. > Not quite so. If you regard only the money spent, this represents indeed a > small loss when changing, but you invest a hell o'time LEARNING Imagine > (which has ALWAYS been known for its STEEP,i.e. time-consuming learning curve) > and as a professional you have that to count in, too. > I have spent years on IM; since ver 1.1. I have also learned LW and don't regret the time spent on either. My point was: if you are so disatisfied with a product, buy something else. Believe me, you arn't too old to learn a new program, even if you are older than me (which I doubt). > > For my part, I wish the IML would limit itself - and while I am on the subject, how can I make objects of a couch -> and a TV (needs to be reasonably detailed) I have a complete living room object that includes big screen TV, cou= ch, lamps, stereo etc. at GraFX Haus. (805) 683-1388 -> I am a relative newie to Imagine (3.0) with very little model buil= din -> experience, so any bit of help would be appreciated. First, get 3.1!! 3.0 didn't handle DXF object well at all. Second, the best thing is to get objects already made and modify them. Much easier and less time consuming. _______________________________________________________ /_________________________________________________________\ /=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\ =3D| Mike van der Sommen || Email: = |=3D =3D| GraFX Haus BBS || mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com = |=3D =3D| Santa Barbara, Ca. || ______________________________________ = |=3D =3D| "..where the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse play golf..." = |=3D =3D|_______________________________________________________________= |=3D --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 125" link IML-125} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-234 " MSG-234 Subject: Re: Imagine Tidbit Booklet @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine Tidbit Booklet Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 05:01:53 From: rhh@ct.picker.com (Randall Hopper) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Perry Lucas: > Well there seems to have been a huge response to my posting about > putting a booklet together. However, there was the question of > AmigaGuide, WWW, or a booklet version of the compilation. AmigaGuide > would be nice for the Amiga users, but it leaves the pc users > in the dust. With WWW, not everyone has access to an HTTP: server, > especially since they might be able to connect to the internet > while designing a piece. The Booklet problem was that some people > live in South Africa and would have rough time getting a copy of it. One comment about a WWW version that might help you out. Every WWW browser I've used (lynx, netscape, and mosaic included, on Unix, DOS, Windows, and FreeBSD) allow you to run the browser using a local HTML file as input. So, if everyone can download the WWW booklet file(s) onto their local hard disk, there's no reason for anyone to need an HTTP server or a network of any kind connected to their machine to access the booklet. Just use the browser like a Amiga/PC hypertext help engine. HTML also addresses another concern I've seen posted. Most WWW browsers support exporting HTML files to Text or Postscript format, so they can be nicely printed or viewed as raw text. I guess the question is, does there exist: 1) A WWW browser for the Amiga (which can operate on local HTML files), or 2) A decent HTML->AmigaGuide converter. By the way, I think the booklet is a great idea. I'm new to Imagine and am looking forward to reading it. Randall Hopper rhh@ct.picker.com @{" Thread 240" link IML-240} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-235 " MSG-235 Subject: Re: Lha Archives @toc contents Subject: Re: Lha Archives Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 06:24:14 From: a.kasimir@magnet.at (Alexander R. Kasimir) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- It seems, the files you downloades from aminet are corrupt, because they were send as 7Bit ASCII, try to UUENCODE it before download! Happy Imagineering ! Alex @{" Thread 36" link IML-36} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-236 " MSG-236 Subject: Imagine WWW site @toc contents Subject: Imagine WWW site Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 07:26:19 From: zmievski@herbie.unl.edu (Silicon) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Imagineers, I am planning on creating a WWW page for Imagine users where all the important information, tips, tricks, utils and such would be hosted. What would you like to see on that page? Would that page help anyone? Andrey @{" Thread 409" link IML-409} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-237 " MSG-237 Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpec... @toc contents Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpec... Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 07:38:48 From: Mike McCool ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 10 Feb 1995 SParker999@aol.com wrote: > That X-Specs stuff sounds great. I'd love to get some of it. But what's WWW? > World Wide Wrestling. World Wide Widgets? : ) Wide-Winged Weasils @{" Thread 164" link IML-164} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-238 " MSG-238 Subject: Re: Lha Archives @toc contents Subject: Re: Lha Archives Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 08:38:45 From: Mike McCool ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Just a thought, you--but are you certain you're downloading your files as binaries? I sometimes forget to input the command 'bin' before I start downloading, and I get all this ascii junk. Before you type your 'get *' command, be sure to type 'bin'. @{" Thread 257" link IML-257} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-239 " MSG-239 Subject: Candle @toc contents Subject: Candle Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 09:04:32 From: mrivers@tbag.tscs.com (Mike Rivers) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- C> >>If you have I3.X, here's a free candle tip: Make a brushmap with C> >>a vertical gadient from the white(top) to black(bottom). C> >>Then make another brushmap that is solid white. Apply the gradient C> >>map to the candle as a 'reflectivity' map and appy the solid white C> >>map as a 'reflection' map. This makes the candle stick glow C> >>like a real lit candle. C> >Umm, wouldn't it be simpler to replace those two brushmaps with the C> >Linear texture, fading the color to white as you get closer to the top C> >of the candle? C> You can't _fade_ reflectivity or reflection in a texture, can you? C> Conny Joensson C> ** .sig under reconstruction ** Yes, It would be possible to use the linear texture or any texture that supports reflecttivity mapping instead of the gradient brushmap. I only used the gradient brush because it was simpler to explain. But the solid white brush map is required as textures don't support 'reflection' mapping(not to be confused with reflectivity mapping). Even though you may had read this in my other posts, what the above basically accomplishes is a psuedo-brightness mapping. you could just as easily use the above method to make windows on a spaceship simply by replacing the gradient map, with a map of bright windows. ------------------------------------------------------- | Commodore failure. Press mouse button to continue | | Guru Meditation $35000000 Task : $00000CBM | ------------------------------------------------------- A4000/060/90mhz WOW! this is fast. 140 Mips 50 Mflops. @{" Thread 318" link IML-318} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-240 " MSG-240 Subject: Re: Imagine Tidbit Booklet @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine Tidbit Booklet Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 13:25:02 From: Robert Iacullo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wouldn't AmiTCP.NoNet do it? On Fri, 10 Feb 1995, Randall Hopper wrote: > Perry Lucas: > > Well there seems to have been a huge response to my posting about > > putting a booklet together. However, there was the question of > > AmigaGuide, WWW, or a booklet version of the compilation. AmigaGuide > > would be nice for the Amiga users, but it leaves the pc users > > in the dust. With WWW, not everyone has access to an HTTP: server, > > especially since they might be able to connect to the internet > > while designing a piece. The Booklet problem was that some people > > live in South Africa and would have rough time getting a copy of it. > > One comment about a WWW version that might help you out. Every WWW browser > I've used (lynx, netscape, and mosaic included, on Unix, DOS, Windows, and > FreeBSD) allow you to run the browser using a local HTML file as input. So, i f > everyone can download the WWW booklet file(s) onto their local hard disk, > there's no reason for anyone to need an HTTP server or a network of any > kind connected to their machine to access the booklet. Just use the browser > like a Amiga/PC hypertext help engine. > > HTML also addresses another concern I've seen posted. Most WWW browsers > support exporting HTML files to Text or Postscript format, so they can be > nicely printed or viewed as raw text. > > I guess the question is, does there exist: > > 1) A WWW browser for the Amiga (which can operate on local HTML files), o r > 2) A decent HTML->AmigaGuide converter. > > By the way, I think the booklet is a great idea. I'm new to Imagine and > am looking forward to reading it. > > Randall Hopper > rhh@ct.picker.com > > @{" Thread 207" link IML-207} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-241 " MSG-241 Subject: I/O @toc contents Subject: I/O Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 18:53:16 From: ThreeDTV@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have an A2000 and a pentium586. I would like to set up a direct link to both computers so I can process images on one and send it to the other. Has anyone ever tried this? Thanx @{" Thread 336" link IML-336} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-242 " MSG-242 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 19:05:17 From: dalamar@MIT.EDU (Craig Andera ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I for one wouldn't mind having an AmigaGuide browser that I could use in Windows. It would make looking through the IML archives a lot more pleasant. @{" Thread 211" link IML-211} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-243 " MSG-243 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 19:31:50 From: Joop.vandeWege@MEDEW.ENTO.WAU.NL (joop van de wege) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi IML, >> Just a thought, is there a way to 'shanghai' the screen which Imagine is >> running on? I am guessing the AmigaGuide is a resizable/movable window >> and it would be nice. >Too bad IM won't run on a public screen or even the WB. I made a small program/hack that turns everyscreen that opens into a publicscreen and also sets the ShangHai bit so that when a shell/amigaguide window is opened it just opens on that screen. It is a bit dangerous because you can quit Imagine and the screen will be left open with the other application still running, if you quit it then the screen will still be open. I'll see if I can find it in my rather dusty programmers archive, if someone wants it. If everybody wants it then I'll put it on Aminet. Greetings Joop @{" Thread 307" link IML-307} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-244 " MSG-244 Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpec... @toc contents Subject: Re: I`ve got lots of PD XSpec... Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 20:01:53 From: Peter Cox ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > That X-Specs stuff sounds great. I'd love to get some of it. But what's WWW? > World Wide Wrestling. World Wide Widgets? : ) We Want Windows.... :-) > > Thanks > > Steve > Peter -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Peter Cox. pdc194@soton.ac.uk | I'm the person your mother warned you | | Part I, MEng | about. | | Mechanical Engineering | | | University of Southampton | I couldn't care less about apathy... | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- @{" Thread 237" link IML-237} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-245 " MSG-245 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 20:35:13 From: Joop.vandeWege@MEDEW.ENTO.WAU.NL (joop van de wege) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi everyone, >you mentioned that the AmigaGuide format is basically an ascii text file >with some delimiters... Yes it is but you can build pretty complex guidefiles. Just have a look at one of the last 4 IML archives. If your program could parse them then it is really good. I and Dick have written an amigaguide parser and viewer based on the help system of Visual Basic. It works great with simple guides like AmigaReport but on the afore mentioned IML archives it just chokes. I'm willing to improve this program and provide it to anyone who wants to use it. Just let me know. >if someone will mail me the specifications for the AmigaGuide format along >with a few sample files, and a decription of how the AmigaGuide viewer >operates, i should be able to build a viewer/importer/print utility for us >Windoze users. >alan_gordie@ml.com Get some IML archives from Aminet and most programs that get uploaded today do all have their documentation in guide format, like Dust (in german :( ). Greetings Joop PS: Hope this message comes through because my earlies reply seems to be lost somewhere in cyberspace. @{" Thread 198" link IML-198} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-246 " MSG-246 Subject: Amiga->PC textures? @toc contents Subject: Amiga->PC textures? Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 21:03:04 From: Locutus of Borg ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, I found some additional textures available for Imagine in Aminet. Can those textures be used on the PC version or is there a way to convert the textures to the PC platform? Also, is there a PC release of DUST3? Thanks *Locutus* @{" Thread 98" link IML-98} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-247 " MSG-247 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits Date: Saturday, 11 February 1995 21:08:59 From: nehla@transport.com (Al Nehl) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joop, Looks like your now getting through. >Hi everyone, > >>you mentioned that the AmigaGuide format is basically an ascii text file >>with some delimiters... -- Al Nehl @{" Thread 79" link IML-79} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-248 " MSG-248 Subject: Newsletter @toc contents Subject: Newsletter Date: Sunday, 12 February 1995 02:48:18 From: "Christopher R. Cockrell" <75304.1572@compuserve.com> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attention. Anyone interested in seeing a monthy or bimonthly Imagine speific publication please let me know. I am currently considering the publication of a small but totally Imagine only newsletter. This publication will more than likely but cross-platform (Amiga & PC). That is to say all information, articles, tech tips, texture tips, bush tips, rendering tips, etc., will be applicable to both current platform versions. It seems that most other 3D rendering programs have their on newsletter but to my knowledge Imagine does not. I feel it's about time we have one. If you are interested drop me a postcard or letter with your name and address on it. Oweing to the responce I get will more than likely depend on the project starting. If not many are interested there will more than likely not be one. CHRISTOPHER COCKRELL PO BOX 9 MANTACHIE, MS 38855 @{" Thread 427" link IML-427} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-249 " MSG-249 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Date: Sunday, 12 February 1995 05:52:04 From: zmievski@herbie.unl.edu (Silicon) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I think this is a great idea. Can you support ftp traffic or will you > link? I am not yet sure if I am going to do ftp site.. But WWW page for sure. > A great collection of sample pic's; Key tutorials from the archives; > samples of the stock textures; a list of known commercial examples. Yes, I thought about this. I am going to put tutorials and stuff like that online. What kind of commercial examples are you talking about? > A monthly thematic contest a la PoVRay; That is an excellent idea. Anyway, I might get started this week on putting together the basics for the page. I would appreciate any help on the design or layout. It's the users who are going to use that page after all.. Andrey @{" Thread 429" link IML-429} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-250 " MSG-250 Subject: I/O @toc contents Subject: I/O Date: Sunday, 12 February 1995 16:36:06 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -> From: ThreeDTV@aol.com -> -> I have an A2000 and a pentium586. I would like to set up a direct = lin -> both computers so I can process images on one and send it to the o= the -> anyone ever tried this? Thanx Yes. All you need is a null modem and a shareware program called Twin Express (Twin11a.LHA). It will allow you to directly access and copy files from the Amiga to the PC....quickly. I have it on GraFX Haus BBS in the PC utilities section. _______________________________________________________ /_________________________________________________________\ /=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\ =3D| Mike van der Sommen || Email: = |=3D =3D| GraFX Haus BBS || mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com = |=3D =3D| Santa Barbara, Ca. || ______________________________________ = |=3D =3D| "..where the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse play golf..." = |=3D =3D|_______________________________________________________________= |=3D --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 319" link IML-319} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-251 " MSG-251 Subject: RE: IMAGINE COOKBOOK @toc contents Subject: RE: IMAGINE COOKBOOK Date: Sunday, 12 February 1995 18:30:18 From: mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com (Mike Vandersommen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -> From: Shane Davison -> -> I was wondering what you thought about these other titles: -> -> How to Imagine -> Try to Imagine -> Imagine the Possibilities -> -> This is in reference to the file I'm going to put together -> of neat and fun things to try in Imagine (+ a couple tutorials). Those are fine. It's your baby. Here's mine: How to IMAGINE THAT! (the Imagine Cookbook) or 50 ways to leave your Render _______________________________________________________ /_________________________________________________________\ /=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\ =3D| Mike van der Sommen || Email: = |=3D =3D| GraFX Haus BBS || mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com = |=3D =3D| Santa Barbara, Ca. || ______________________________________ = |=3D =3D| "..where the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse play golf..." = |=3D =3D|_______________________________________________________________= |=3D --- =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 @{" Thread 342" link IML-342} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-252 " MSG-252 Subject: Forms Editor Tutorial (was: Imagine WWW site) @toc contents Subject: Forms Editor Tutorial (was: Imagine WWW site) Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 07:16:54 From: jgoldman@acs.bu.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > On Fri, 10 Feb 1995, Silicon wrote: > I'd love to see some tutes on the Forms editor (I'm afraid to touch that > thing ;) > > MH > The forms editor is the greatest tool in Imagine's arsenal!!! It's so powerful and flexible, (you can create almost anything) it's almost impossible to create an all-encompassing tutorial. Perhaps if you suggest types of objects... For instance, Creation of Humanoid Bodies and Body Parts. I dunno... I posted a small Getting to Know the Forms Editor type of thing a while back. Let me see here... Ahhh... ---- Forms Editor thing...---- This is my advice to anyone interested in the forms editor. A lot of this may be elemantary, but some info might actually be useful... This might definitely (good grammar?) get confusing... It's also rather long... The forms editor is one of Imagine's greatest features. I find it's easier to create incredibly realistic things in the forms editor than with NURBS (ooohhh, imagine a spline based forms editor)... Basically, when you create in the forms editor you edit an object's profile. It's sort of like MRIs (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) A Basic Form Example- Take a simple example, your thumb. Treat your thumb as if it were an object on an axis. Say that the Z-axis runs from the base of your thumb to the tip. The X-axis runs across the top of your thumb. The Y-axis goes through your thumb. In other words, if your thumb were an Imagine object it would be oriented as if you were viewing a painting with your thumb out in front of you... First trace the right profile of your thumb. If you want to do this the extra step way, lay your thumb down on a piece of paper and trace it for all three views (you'll have troubles with the top view, so just eye it.). Then, just copy what you see on paper to the screen. Do this for all three views. What you get is a pretty crude looking thumb. To get a better looking thumb you have to go in and edit individual cross-sections. But first... Remember that if the object is solid you must have a totally enclosed profile (the endpoints are separated normally. You have to place the endpoint points at the same location. An easy way to do this is to select the cursor lock and lock the endpoints to similar grid locations). In the case of the heart, do the same thing as the thumb... What the Forms Editor Really Does- It's important to understand what exactly you're doing when manipulating points in the forms editor, so go back to a simple sphere (new object and new defaults). Turn on the solid wireframe option and view the sphere object from the front. Notice how many points are on your front view profile. You will see that they equal the number of vertical sections in the wireframe object divided by two. Every point in an editor view has a twin on the opposite side of the object (except for the top view). If you add a point in the front view you will notice that two points are actually added. One on one side of the profile, and one on the other side. When altering an object's profile you actually directly manipulate a specific point, but because of the forms editor's nature it changes other points around it to tween and smooth the change. Editing Individual Cross-Sections- Look at a forms object like several horizontal cross-sections (which are circular by default) connected like skin. Think of the top view as the cross-section editor. By default only one cross-section can be manipulated, the top one. It can be considered a controlling, or key, cross-section. Because it is the only key cross-section defined on the object then whatever you change will affect every cross-section below it. To have ultimate control of the individual cross-sections you have to define the cross-section you want to manipulate as a key cross-section. You do this by selecting '+ KEY' and selecting the cross-section you want to manipulate (in the front or right view). When you perform this operation (or 'Select') Imagine will display which cross-sections have been defined as key cross-sections in red. At first, you will notice that only the top cross-section is highlighted in red because no others have been selected to act as key cross-sections. Make the middle cross-section a key cross-section. The object now has two cross-sections which can be separately manipulated as keys. Use 'Select' to pick the cross-section you want to alter. Think of key cross-sections as animation frames. In an animation you can set an initial postion for an object on one frame and a final position on another frame. These two frames are now key frames. When the animation is generated the object's position will tween between the two key frames. The same process occurs with key cross-sections. All non-key cross-sections tween between key cross-sections. Take an example of a salt shaker with a circular top and square bottom. If you create a circular key cross-section as the top of the shaker and a square key cross-section for the bottom all the cross-sections between the top and bottom will blend to form a smooth transition from cirle to square. So now you know how to alter the individual cross-sections. Remember that you can also delete key key cross-sections. Just be sure you select the appropriate cross-section. BTW, Imagine tells you waht cross-section you're manipulating in the upper menu bar. Also, remember that Imagine's cross-section tween goes from key to key in a downward order. If there is no key cross-section at the object's base Imagine will use the next highest defined key section. So Where do the Front/Right Views Come into Play?- If the top editor edits individual cross-sections then the front and side view editors locate the cross-sections in space. The default sphere has all the cross-sections parallel to each other. You can change the orientation of a cross-section (so that it is not parallel to the ground) by moving points on the front and right views. Basically, the front and side view alter an objects overall profile shape. This particular explanation only really works with the default sphere, but the results can be translated to any object. The front view controls all the points along the object's x-axis. The side view controls all the points along the object's y-axis. This effectively splits the sphere into four sections; a front profile, back profile, left profile, and right profile. In the front view select the right-most point and you'll notice that it's twin point will be highlighted on the left. These two points define the right-most and left-most points of one cross-section. Specifically, these two points represent two outermost x-axis points on the middle cross-section. Similarly, the same two points in the side view control the farthest points on the y-axis of the middle cross-section. You will find that by altering these you alter the orientation of the cross-section. If you raise the right-most point in the front view and lower the left-most point the middle cross-section now tilts. What Does It All Mean?- It's tough to explain exactly how the forms editor operates, and in particular what alters what exactly. So my greatest advice is to experiment. The easiest way to create object was illustrated in the first section. Create profiles for the object you want to create. If you need better form edit the individual cross-section as if yo @{" Thread 274" link IML-274} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-253 " MSG-253 Subject: Memory problem? @toc contents Subject: Memory problem? Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 07:25:48 From: Locutus of Borg ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, I'm currently working on a drum set in Imagine L/T. I started with two toms ready and everything worked fine. I just added the bass drum and when I render, most of the bass drum is missing as well as parts of the toms. Is this a memory problem? My system has 8Mb of RAM. The toms have around 20,000 faces and the bass drum must be 8,000 faces. Is there a way to compute the RAM required to render a scene? Thanks *Locutus* @{" Thread 280" link IML-280} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-254 " MSG-254 Subject: Re: Memory problem? @toc contents Subject: Re: Memory problem? Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 08:29:00 From: dalamar@MIT.EDU (Craig Andera ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Hi, > >I'm currently working on a drum set in Imagine L/T. I started with two >toms >ready and everything worked fine. I just added the bass drum and when I >render, most of the bass drum is missing as well as parts of the toms. Is >this a memory problem? My system has 8Mb of RAM. The toms have around >20,000 >faces and the bass drum must be 8,000 faces. >Is there a way to compute the RAM required to render a scene? > >Thanks > >*Locutus* I've noticed the same thing. I think what you're seeing happens only in the Detail or Stage Editor's Quickrender. I've noticed that when rendering complex objects made of many polygons, some of the polygons will completely fail to show up. However, when I render in the Project Editor, everything comes out fine. Like you, I have only 8MB of memory, and I assume this is somehow related. I would love to know if this is something other people have seen, and if so, is it going to be fixed in 3.2? While I'm on the subject, I hear 3.2 is out next week (can't find the post, but I seem to recall that: hope I'm not spreading rumors). Is that Amiga, PC or both? -Craig @{" Thread 40" link IML-40} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-255 " MSG-255 Subject: Re: Locomotive objects @toc contents Subject: Re: Locomotive objects Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 11:34:27 From: rbyrne@3dform.edex.edu.au (Robert Byrne) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- In article <9502100317111732@beect.iaccess.za> (Peter Borcherds) writes: > I am looking for any Imagine objects of locomotives (steam or diesel) > - preferably very detailed. If anyone knows of the location of such > objects could they please let me know. The only locomotive I've ever seen is on the LightROM CD > Another thing I have been trying - I want to model the inside of a > house - complete with furniture - to help with interior design. I've > tried various methods, but they have all given me problems due to > speed of rendering, etc. Anyone have any ideas? There's not a great deal you can do, rendering times are always going to be a problem. There is also a complete room and furniture (TV, lounge etc) on the LightROM. To reduce rendering times, use scanline not trace, keep objects as simple (low face count) as possible and keep the lighting to a minimum. > - and while I am on the subject, how can I make objects of a couch > and a TV (needs to be reasonably detailed) I've made furniture and a monitor in the Forms editor. I think this editor is under-rated because of the time involved in learning its interface. Once you get a handle on what's going on in the different views you can put together very complex objects in a short time and add the fine detail such as logos and buttons in the Detail editor. The trick is not to make the whole object in one hit, make a piece at a time and then group them together in the detail editor. The best (easiest) way to do this is by using models that can be physically measured so as to keep everything in scale. There's a series of articles called "The Imagine Compendium" put together by Steve Worley, among others that have some invaluable tutorials for Imagine. You guessed it, it's on LightROM too, along with 53 archives of previous IML messages. Someone in your area may know of its where-abouts. > I am a relative newie to Imagine (3.0) with very little model building > experience, so any bit of help would be appreciated. > > Thanks > > Peter Borcherds > > peter.borcherds@beect.iaccess.za "The long and winding road" -- : Robert (Bob) Byrne : A3000/25 : vox Ph: +61 66 864324 : : rbyrne@3dform.edex.edu.au : : Ballina, NSW Australia : @{" Thread 446" link IML-446} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-256 " MSG-256 Subject: Upgrades?? @toc contents Subject: Upgrades?? Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 12:23:00 From: a00448@dtic.ua.es (ERNESTO POVEDA CORTES) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello all imagineers, first, i must give thanxs to all people who help me with my question about the Constant Upgrade Program few days ago. one of you give me the address (email) of Mike Halvorsen but i haven't any answer from him so i put here the folowing question: i want get the Upgrade Program, but all tries i did to get in contact with impulse (not by voice) were no answered, so if a send a $100 to them .... will i get the Upgrades? thanx in advance... +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | 'Do not underestimate the power of the Force.' | | | | email: a00448@dtic.ua.es --> Ernesto Poveda Cortes (I am not a number :) | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ @{" Thread 314" link IML-314} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-257 " MSG-257 Subject: Re: Lha Archives @toc contents Subject: Re: Lha Archives Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 13:12:17 From: a00448@dtic.ua.es (ERNESTO POVEDA CORTES) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > When I download Imagine objects, attributes and textures from the Aminet sites , > they are usually all archived using lha. > > Unfortuanely when I try to decompress them, I receive error messages, > along the lines of, "corrupted data" and "extranious data". > > I am using an Amiga A1500, and lha v1.38. Other lha files I can read, > but most of the stuff from Aminet gives me the same error messages. > > Can anyone help me? > > Jeremy > If you are getting the archives from 'ftp' maybe you must use 'bin' keyword to get binary files, if not the server will try to translate the ascii chars to the ones of your machine. +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | 'Do not underestimate the power of the Force.' | | | | email: a00448@dtic.ua.es --> Ernesto Poveda Cortes (I am not a number :) | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ @{" Thread 298" link IML-298} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-258 " MSG-258 Subject: Swirl @toc contents Subject: Swirl Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 14:36:46 From: Daniel_Dacey@kumear.megalink.com.au (Daniel Dacey) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi All, Does anyone have any suggestions about the best way to do the following: - Have a 2D representation of a man with a IV needle in his arm. - The drug in the IV swirling around and through the man. Think of how ink swirls through a glass of water to get the kind of look I want. Hope this makes sense as I'm pushing up hill to meet a deadline and I'm kind of tired. Any suggestions etc would be most appreciated. I'll post the results of any suggestions etc in a few days. Regards -- Via DLG Pro v1.0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Daniel Dacey Peppermint Graphics Newcastle Australia (049)51-4926 @{" Thread 323" link IML-323} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-259 " MSG-259 Subject: Which PCs work @toc contents Subject: Which PCs work Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 14:41:08 From: gregory denby ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi all, Since it appears that the Amiga is lost in liquidation Limbo (or Hell), I suppose I won't be seeing any better rendering engine for Imagine without buying a PC. However, I've read the comments people have made previously about Imagine working/not working on various PC set ups. Could you folks e-mail me what system configurations have worked or not worked for you. I will compile the results I receive, and post the results here for general reference. Thanx in advance, Greg Denby gdenby@darwin.cc.nd.edu P.S. my vote for and Imagine tidbits/WWW page is "The Imaginary Toolbox." @{" Thread 447" link IML-447} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-260 " MSG-260 Subject: Re: Memory problem? @toc contents Subject: Re: Memory problem? Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 17:07:33 From: mbc@po.CWRU.Edu (Michael B. Comet) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Hi, > >I'm currently working on a drum set in Imagine L/T. I started with two toms >ready and everything worked fine. I just added the bass drum and when I >render, most of the bass drum is missing as well as parts of the toms. Is >this a memory problem? My system has 8Mb of RAM. The toms have around 20,000 >faces and the bass drum must be 8,000 faces. >Is there a way to compute the RAM required to render a scene? > Yep. It's ram. When imagine runs out, parts of your objects will disappear. To test it, try doing a test render of just certain drums. -- +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Michael Comet, mbc@po.CWRU.Edu - CWRU, Software Engineer/Graphics Artist | | Graphics & Anims - http://www.cwru.edu/0/cwrunet/homes/comet/index.html | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ @{" Thread 261" link IML-261} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-261 " MSG-261 Subject: Re: Memory problem? @toc contents Subject: Re: Memory problem? Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 19:47:07 From: Locutus of Borg ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 13 Feb 1995, Craig Andera wrote: > > I've noticed the same thing. I think what you're seeing happens only in the > Detail or Stage Editor's Quickrender. I've noticed that when rendering > complex objects made of many polygons, some of the polygons will > completely fail to show up. However, when I render in the Project Editor, > everything comes out fine. The problem started in the stage editor. Since then, I added some objects and cannot quickrender in the stage editor (not enough memory) and polygons are missing when I render from the project editor. I'll try to render the same scene this week on a 12MB system. > > Like you, I have only 8MB of memory, and I assume this is somehow related. > I would love to know if this is something other people have seen, and if > so, is it going to be fixed in 3.2? > I hope that they will at least display an error message or a warning. *Locutus* @{" Thread 254" link IML-254} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-262 " MSG-262 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 19:56:46 From: Douglas Rudd ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > We should create the file in either a single format that is readable by > both systems, or two formats. Having just AmigaGuide may be nice and pretty > but leaves all PC users out in the cold. > > Kurt Knippel > High Impact Productions > I agree. The problem is that so much stuff comes out in AG format. If there were a reader for AG on the PC is would make life simpler. The AG format is rather simple and it shouldn't be too hard to develop a reader for it. Doug Rudd @{" Thread 222" link IML-222} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-263 " MSG-263 Subject: Re[2]: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re[2]: IML Tidbits Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 21:58:09 From: Alan_Gordie@pcmailgw.ml.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- as soon as i can get my hands on the AmigaGuide format and a few sample files (which "Anime a day..." has so generously offered to send) i will begin development of a windows based viewer for AmigaGuide files. one problem, i don't do dos. so someone else will have to do the dos based reader...if there is a need thanks alan_gordie@ml.com ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Author: Douglas Rudd at UNIXGTWY Date: 2/13/95 11:56 AM > > We should create the file in either a single format that is readable by > both systems, or two formats. Having just AmigaGuide may be nice and pretty > but leaves all PC users out in the cold. > > Kurt Knippel > High Impact Productions > I agree. The problem is that so much stuff comes out in AG format. If there were a reader for AG on the PC is would make life simpler. The AG format is rather simple and it shouldn't be too hard to develop a reader for it. Doug Rudd @{" Thread 294" link IML-294} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-264 " MSG-264 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 22:11:53 From: Douglas Rudd ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > We should create the file in either a single format that is readable by > > both systems, or two formats. Having just AmigaGuide may be nice and pretty > > but leaves all PC users out in the cold. > > Well what about when we get Ascii files off the Net, the majority hav > carriage returns all over it......So I say do it in Amigaguide format PC > users can still read the Ascii so no problems. > > As for html I've never heard of it. :) > ^^^^ html is very similar to AG. Too bad Commodore didn't use that as their hypertext standard. There are utilities for converting AG -> html, but none to go html -> AG as yet. I would recommend to Impulse that they incorporate AG as a hypertext help standard for Amiga AND PC versions, which would eliminate this problem for good. The question is: can Impulse get the licence to do a dos version of AG? What with Commodore in a live/dead state. On the other hand, if someone does a dos version of the AG reader and releases it as pd, Impulse can release help files in AG format. If this can't be done, then I would suggest we stay with plain ascii, so as to not alienate either segment (stuck with the lowest common denominator). Doug Rudd @{" Thread 243" link IML-243} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-265 " MSG-265 Subject: Trace scenes wanted @toc contents Subject: Trace scenes wanted Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 23:23:18 From: Hesham Amiri ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi all, I'm working on this nice little game and I need 12-15 nice backdrops. The game will be 100% pd so I'm only going to accept pd images, and ofcourse I will mention the nice people that sent them to me :) The game is for the Amiga AGA, I can accept the images in : IFF format impulse format jpeg format gif format They should all HIRES & LACED, but in any case I will be shrinking the image to 320*400. email me for more info at: hmamiri@carbon.cudenver.edu Thanks, Hesham Amiri @{" Thread 153" link IML-153} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-266 " MSG-266 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Date: Monday, 13 February 1995 23:28:07 From: zmievski@herbie.unl.edu (Silicon) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > As for what this page should contain; well, the IML-archives, the 'tidbits' > from those archives, any other tutorials that you can get your hands on, > your (and other users) favourite images. > Maybe even such a 'monthly competition' as povray.org has (if you haven't > seen it: a new subject every month, artists post their work, a jury decides > wich images are best, images are put on a web-site). Have a look at > 'http://www.pht.com/art/art_show.html'. > As I see it the problem is not WHAT to put in there. The problem > is making the stuff searchable, to insert references and cross-references. > > Anyways, cyaround, and drop me a line if there is anything I can do. Hi! Thanks for giving me some ideas. I will definitely get to implementing all of them. I was also going to do something like texture previewing... Description of each texture and a small image showing what the texture should look like. That should be interesting. Who would decide which image is the best? Andrey @{" Thread 406" link IML-406} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-267 " MSG-267 Subject: Re: Swirl @toc contents Subject: Re: Swirl Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 00:31:05 From: "Anime a day..." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 13 Feb 1995, Daniel Dacey wrote: > Hi All, > > Does anyone have any suggestions about the best way to do the following: > > - Have a 2D representation of a man with a IV needle in his arm. > - The drug in the IV swirling around and through the man. Think of how > ink swirls through a glass of water to get the kind of look I want. > > Hope this makes sense as I'm pushing up hill to meet a deadline and I'm > kind of tired. Hmm.. Try rotoscoping.. :^) (couldn't resist!) Bill @{" Thread 34" link IML-34} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-268 " MSG-268 Subject: Mouse.SYS trouble @toc contents Subject: Mouse.SYS trouble Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 00:44:12 From: wolfram schwenzer ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Imagineers, This is a follow-up to my problems with moving the camera in the Stage Editor (when the double circle has turned orange and I'll move it with the left mouse button depressed suddenly the whole system locks up forcing me to do a cold reboot). I have the vague impression that the fault could lay in the way IMAGINE couples to the mouse driver (I use the line "DEVICEHIGH=MOUSE.SYS" in my PC's CONFIG.SYS file). Meanwhile I have tested every conceivable combination of stripping down my CONFIG.SYS files (yes, Greg Tsadilas' proposal on the IML, too), I have even changed the physical pointing device (from trackball to digitizing tablet) - everything, including drawing programs under Window3.1 and standalone DOS applications using the mouse just run fine EXCEPT the %!@* IMAGINE3.1 in the Stage Editor (I think IMPULSE had better relied on a proven technology for implementing memory & mouse management than to develop their own - they don't even MENTION how to cope with the CONFIG.SYS obstacles in their manual ... couldn't they care less ?!) ANY hint about like troubles and how to cope with them are welcome. Until then I have stopped to fight with this stubborn piece of software (feel like the poor boy who is standing in front of the candy store with all the goodies outa reach); IMAGINE should get a prize for taxing the patience of even the hardest 3D modeling aficionado ... 8-(( Sorry, didn't want to hurt anybody's feelings about his dearest toy ;-). I know you are a resourceful bunch who has given a helping hand whenever you could ... All the best W.S. -- wolfram schwenzer Internet : schwenzr@nemeter.dinoco.DE @{" Thread 296" link IML-296} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-269 " MSG-269 Subject: Re: Ambient light @toc contents Subject: Re: Ambient light Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 01:24:50 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >When I try to add ambient light in the Action editor by choosing "Globals" >and set the level there to 20.0 (let's say for the blue component), save >the >settings and return to the Stage editor to quickrender the scene the >ambient >light does not show (i.e. the scene is illuminated as before). What else do >I have to do to make the ambient light appear ? Are you sure you pressed after writing '20'? Conny Joensson @{" Thread 246" link IML-246} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-270 " MSG-270 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 01:41:17 From: Shane Davison ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Silicon wrote: > > Thanks for giving me some ideas. I will definitely get to implementing > all of them. I was also going to do something like texture > previewing... Description of each texture and a small image showing > what the texture should look like. That should be interesting. > > Who would decide which image is the best? > > Andrey Well, I've been slowly rendering the Imagine textures (in alphabetical order) at 320x240x16mil. I've just used the default values and kept only the non-blank images. If you'd like to use those, I have A-C (im-txtrs.zip) and D-F (im2-txtr.zip) on ftp.netnet.net in /pub/mirrors/ truespace/textures. Regarding the IML tidbits, I'm almost done organizing the items I have and I was wondering where I should upload them (please include 'incoming' directory). I will e-mail those directly who have _already_ sent requests in personal e-mail. Regards, -- Shane Davison (tsml) daviso@cs.uregina.ca @{" Thread 398" link IML-398} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-271 " MSG-271 Subject: Re: IMAGINE COOKBOOK @toc contents Subject: Re: IMAGINE COOKBOOK Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 03:10:54 From: CaptKurt@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- As far as naming goes. "Imagine the Possibilities" is the name of a software package, and is most likely protected under copyright laws. Kurt Knippel High Impact Productions @{" Thread 461" link IML-461} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-272 " MSG-272 Subject: Re: Ambient light @toc contents Subject: Re: Ambient light Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 03:41:21 From: Roger Straub ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 13 Feb 1995 cjo@esrange.ssc.se wrote: > >When I try to add ambient light in the Action editor by choosing "Globals" > >and set the level there to 20.0 (let's say for the blue component), save > >the > >settings and return to the Stage editor to quickrender the scene the > >ambient > >light does not show (i.e. the scene is illuminated as before). What else do > >I have to do to make the ambient light appear ? > > Are you sure you pressed after writing '20'? Also - 20 is a VERY low value. If you actually want to SEE the ambient light, you might want to try a value somewhere around 75-100. > > Conny Joensson > See ya, Roger @{" Thread 269" link IML-269} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-273 " MSG-273 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 03:58:55 From: Roger Straub ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 13 Feb 1995, Silicon wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for giving me some ideas. I will definitely get to implementing > all of them. I was also going to do something like texture > previewing... Description of each texture and a small image showing > what the texture should look like. That should be interesting. > > Who would decide which image is the best? Actually, if you get the IMTguide_1a.lha file in aminet under gfx/3d, it will convert your texture.txt and lite.txt files into an AmigaGuide file, complete with example pics (just click on the [Example Object] button). Maybe you could convert this file to html. The only problem is that the pictures are sometimes not exactly the best representation of the texture. Some, though, are SPECTACULAR. Many thanks to Doug Rudd and D.F. Duck! > > Andrey > > See ya, Roger @{" Thread 266" link IML-266} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-274 " MSG-274 Subject: Re: Forms Editor Tutorial (was: Imagine WWW site) @toc contents Subject: Re: Forms Editor Tutorial (was: Imagine WWW site) Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 04:48:40 From: Michael Hazlett ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A LOT OF USEFUL TEXT DELETED------- Thanks for that informative textfile :) I'll tell ya how I get on. MH @{" Thread 396" link IML-396} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-275 " MSG-275 Subject: RE: IMAGINE 3.2 ? @toc contents Subject: RE: IMAGINE 3.2 ? Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 04:53:51 From: William Eric Donoho ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 10 Feb 1995, Mike Vandersommen wrote: > I think your point is well taken. If I were Impulse, I'd much prefer > loyal customers who grumble than customers who simply frisbee their > software off a cliff and move over to a competitor. I KNOW Mike > Halvorson reads IML since I've hit a nerve more than once and got > immediate Email directly from him. I don't think any of the comments > lately can be characterized as "whining and flaming", simply loyal users > who have legitimate grievences and questions that never seem to be > addressed when talking to Impulse's Tech support. >=20 > Personally, I still use Imagine almost exclusively, and plan to in the > future. I hope Impulse continues improving Imagine....and really listens > to it's customers....or the very least, nods it's head once in awhile. > _______________________________________________________ > /_________________________________________________________\ > /=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\ > =3D| Mike van der Sommen || Email: |=3D > =3D| GraFX Haus BBS || mike.vandersommen@caddy.uu.silcom.com |=3D > =3D| Santa Barbara, Ca. || ______________________________________ |=3D > =3D| "..where the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse play golf..." |=3D > =3D|_______________________________________________________________|=3D > --- > =FE InterNet - GraFX Haus BBS - Santa Barbara, Ca - (805) 683-1388 >=20 I use imagine excluslively. I like imagine. ... but I want more "continous" upgrades for my $100 fee. That's all. H*ll, what gripes me is that they don't spell it out in plain english. Hey, Impulse, why not say this: $200 for 4.0 in 1 year -or- $100 for 3.1 NOW +plus+ $100 for 4.0 in 1 year Eric Donoho | "Let's go to burger king and get Louisville, KY USA | a chicken sandwich!" donoho@iglou.com @{" Thread 232" link IML-232} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-276 " MSG-276 Subject: Swirl @toc contents Subject: Swirl Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 05:29:14 From: gareth.qually@beect.iaccess.za (Gareth Qually) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This would probably work with particles, but a major time problem rears its ugly head. You could probably create irregular tubes with a ghost or nebula texture attached to it. Then twist and bend the tube to make a swirl. After creating a few of these, have them twist around eachother. I haven't tried this, so I don't know what it will turn out like. If I get some time I'll test it. Chow... gareth.qually@beect.iaccess.za @{" Thread 258" link IML-258} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-277 " MSG-277 Subject: Re: Re: Ambient light @toc contents Subject: Re: Re: Ambient light Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 06:11:30 From: Michael North ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Also - 20 is a VERY low value. If you actually want to SEE the ambient > light, you might want to try a value somewhere around 75-100. > > > Wow! I've always gone by Steve Worley's recommendation to stick to about 10, 10, 10. I was using higher values but kept getting washed out looking pictures. Michael North @{" Thread 327" link IML-327} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-278 " MSG-278 Subject: IML Tidbits... @toc contents Subject: IML Tidbits... Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 06:31:53 From: plucas@vt.edu (Perry Lucas) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sorry to post this, but to anyone that is interested in helping/ creating the IML Tidbit books/www/ag please contact me at plucas@vt.edu Seems that there are a lot of people wanting to do this and seems senseless for all of us to be covering the same ground over again. Thanks --Perry _,_/| \o.O; ------------------------------------------oOO =(___)= OOo------ Perry J.Lucas U Emails: plucas@vt.edu "PJ" on Diversity University plucas@raven.cybercom.com Telnet: moo.du.org 8888 lucasp@erau.db.erau.edu HTML Hompage: http://erau.db.erau.edu:80/~lucasp @{" Thread 283" link IML-283} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-279 " MSG-279 Subject: Re: Attitudes @toc contents Subject: Re: Attitudes Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 08:13:22 From: Ted Stethem ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On 16 December 1994, Mike Halvorson wrote: > > From: Mike Halvorson > To: Stethem Ted > Subject: Attitudes > Date: Friday, December 16, 1994 8:33PM > > Ted, > > > As for the Constant upgrade, and bug fixes. There is something that > you > dont realize, our code does not, in most cases have the room to add a patch > to > the software, you need to have areas where the code can patch itself, we > have > been lucky a couple of times. > > > > Why dont you send me a list of things you want to see, how about > some > critical positive suggestions, how about looking to the future, or I guess > you > can just allow in the past, phewwww. > > Mike > > OK, Mike, I accept your challenge to provide a list of things I would like to see, which I have already done a few times and I will refresh your memory of the responses you have provided, as well as some critical positive suggestions. 1. The spherical brushmap seam "bug": It was there in 2.0, 2.9, 3.0 and now, 3.1. You told me several months ago that it was not a bug, it was "a fundamental design flaw". Why can't you fix this? 2. Close gadget for error requestor windows: I asked you to provide this during 2.9 and you said "the code is getting too big now and the programmers will kill me if I ask for any more". Well, you have added several new features, which must have expanded the code, but still no close gadget on the error window. I find this very irritating. 3. Since you have such a problem with unmanageable code size, I suggested you modularize the program ala Lightwave. Lightwave and the Modeler are seperate modules that can be loaded separately or from each other if need be. Your answer to this was "just start another Imagine task". This answer was really puzzling. Since you endorse the PC version so much, I wonder how you are starting several Imagine tasks from DOS, which as we all know is the only OS on the PC that Imagine will run from. Now, if you are talking about the Amiga, this is possible, but considering it takes a few megs just to load Imagine, how does this work with your policy of supporting the lowest end user? There is no real reason for Imagine to load the Detail Editor and Forms Editor with the Stage and Action Editor. If the code were modularized, this would fix your problem with the code being "too huge". I often hear this from software managers that have not practiced software configuration control and it is their way of doublespeak for saying the code has grown uncontrollably and I don't have any idea what routine is calling what and I am scared that if I try to modularize at this point, it will blow up. At any rate, I am asking you to think about modularizing the Modeler section and the Staging/Action/Project section. On the Amiga, it would allow for the setting up of several rendering projects by loading several Staging/Action/Project (let's just call it the Stage module) without the overhead of the modeler code sitting in RAM. If you need the interactivity of the Modelers, just have each module have the capability to load the other module, like Lightwave does. 3. Scanline shadows: I could drag up that Impulse newsletter for 3.0 that was published over two years ago but one of the things promised was Scanline Shadows. You told me several months ago that you had tried but it slowed the program down to a crawl and that was why it wasn't provided in 2.9. I don't understand this since both Lightwave and 3D Studio have very good, effective scanline shadowing and they are both very fast renderers. Why don't you see if you can strike up a deal with their programmers for some tips on how to do fast scanline shadows? 4. True Inverse kinematics: In that same newsletter, you promised true inverse kinematics. Now, you don't seriously call the Freeze/Constrain in 3.0 to be "true" inverse kinematics? All you are doing is using the individual selection of axes for move and rotate that have always been there. True inverse kinematics provides for the motions of a child as governed by the parent. Please make some improvements to this feature. 5. Adjustable Screen Sizes: You have been monitoring this list long enough to know that almost every user wants this feature. Again, 3D Studio allows screen sizes beyond the standard 640x480. Lightwave is supporting 3rd party graphics boards and already allows 800x600 on Picasso and Spectrum boards. How about some graphic board support, too, beyond the Firecracker and Opalvision? At the very least, provide some options for selectable screen sizes beyond the 640x400. Also, since some people have found this out through experimentation, how about a choice for fewer colors on the editor screens, like 2 or 4, and maybe a choice of two colors on the Project screen, or none during rendering, as many people have found this speeds rendering. 6. Documentation: Would it really kill you to provide more complete documentation on things like the Effects and new features. There has been some attempts at on-disk documentation but these have been feeble and incomplete. I don't mind them being on-disk but how about making them more informative and complete? 7. Animated Brush Map: I really wanted this feature and it was one of the main reasons I signed up for the continuing upgrade. It works but it only works for 16 color animations. I find this too restrictive and your 3.1 docs don't specify this as a limitation. You need to support Extra Half-Brite (EHB),HAM-Interlace, and HAM8 on the Amiga side,with ANIM5 and ANIM7-32 modes and even FLC for the Amiga would be a plus. 8. Texture speeds: Some of the new textures are really good, especially Fire and Clouds. But, even in Scanline, it is like my computer hits a brick wall in rendering speed when it starts rendering a textured object. And layering? forget it! Even if you did have a 100 MHz Pentium, the rendering of textured objects would still be slow. Now, Essence does not have the range of textures that have been provided with 3.0 and 3.1, but Essence textures render much faster. Isn't there someway to optimize or improve the texture routines to speed them up? That's all I have for now. Now, it is time for you, Mr. Mike Halvorson, to live up to your words. Your ad in Computer Graphics World states," Real Support from Real People - Maybe the best reason to become an Imagine L/T user is our great customer support." This is a challenge to live up to this claim. I have a friend, who happens to be fairly wealthy, that purchased Imagine V3.0 for the Amiga several months ago. He was sent a PAL version of the program (he lives in the US with a US address). Now, I know how to run a PAL program on my NTSC machine but he does not want to go through the hassle. So, he has asked Impulse to exchange the PAL version for the NTSC. This was several months ago and he still has not gotten the NTSC version. And before you ask,"Did he call?", yes, he did, and in fact has talked to you a couple of times. His opinion, in his words, is that you are "a flake". Now, this guy has some bucks, his Amiga has 110 Megs of RAM because he likes to do everything from RAM rather that the harddrive, and he is almost totally turned off to Impulse. If this is an example of your "great customer support", then there appears to be a disagreement in perception. Let's see where we go from here. Patiently awaiting Imagine V3.2. @{" Thread 291" link IML-291} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-280 " MSG-280 Subject: Re: Memory problem? @toc contents Subject: Re: Memory problem? Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 08:34:24 From: m.rubin9@genie.geis.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- MBC, >>I'm currently working on a drum set in Imagine L/T. I started with two toms >>ready and everything worked fine. I just added the bass drum and when I >>render, most of the bass drum is missing as well as parts of the toms. Is >>this a memory problem? My system has 8Mb of RAM. The toms have around 20,000 >>faces and the bass drum must be 8,000 faces. >>Is there a way to compute the RAM required to render a scene? Although I've done all my "Imagining" on the Amiga, I can only recommend that you simplify your objects. Those are an awful lot of faces for 8 Mb! I find 16Mb to be just adequate for complex renderings with maps, etc. I'm just about to try out Gigamem, which is a virtual memory handler. I understand that it works quite well with Imagine and that the speed hit is pretty small. Jon Rubin @{" Thread 260" link IML-260} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-281 " MSG-281 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits (was Re: Candle) @toc contents Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits (was Re: Candle) Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 09:46:41 From: Ed Totman ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 10 Feb 1995 Joop.vandeWege@MEDEW.ENTO.WAU.NL wrote: > Seems I have to spent some time on my Guide reader for MSDOS. > > I have a working version which reads 99% of all available AmigaReport guide > files but on complex guide files like the last 4 IML archives it completely > chokes. Also the links are displayed with two characters like , which I > want to change to something more button like. > > Sounds like a good idea ? > > Let me know (on the IML) > > Greetings Joop A reader for the PC would be very useful. Please upload it! Ed Totman etotman@gort.ucsd.edu @{" Thread 197" link IML-197} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-282 " MSG-282 Subject: Exelent gifs @toc contents Subject: Exelent gifs Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 10:37:56 From: Callace@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Is anybody interested in 20 best Gifs I've ever traced? If you do let me know. Later . @{" Thread 293" link IML-293} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-283 " MSG-283 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits... @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits... Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 12:41:45 From: Joop.vandeWege@MEDEW.ENTO.WAU.NL (joop van de wege) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Good Morning, At least in NL it is. :-) >Sorry to post this, but to anyone that is interested in helping/ >creating the IML Tidbit books/www/ag please contact me at >plucas@vt.edu Seems that there are a lot of people wanting to >do this and seems senseless for all of us to be covering the same >ground over again. >Thanks >--Perry I would like to help too. I willing to convert old archives so that spotting useful subjects and replies becomes easier. I have done a couple for myself, 43-50. Not to mention that I have also most attachements since June 1994. Please let me know if I can help. Greetings Joop @{" Thread 212" link IML-212} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-284 " MSG-284 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 13:39:41 From: Joop.vandeWege@MEDEW.ENTO.WAU.NL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Just a thought, is there a way to 'shanghai' the screen which Imagine is >running on? I am guessing the AmigaGuide is a resizable/movable window >and it would be nice. Yes thats possible but should be done with care. Quiting Imagine while Amigaguide is still open is asking for trouble. I wrote once a small program/hack which declared all screens which opened afterwards as an public screen. It made also the last opened screen the default and set the Shanghai bit. Works great, and will see if I can still find it somewhere in my dusty programming archives. Greetings Joop @{" Thread 262" link IML-262} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-285 " MSG-285 Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits (was Re: Candle) @toc contents Subject: Re: Booklet of Tidbits (was Re: Candle) Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 14:23:22 From: Joop.vandeWege@MEDEW.ENTO.WAU.NL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello IML, >> >> what about us ibm/dos/windoze guys? >> >Good point. There should be some hypertext format such as html (similar >to AmigaGuide) which is pd for the windows/dos side and is not too much >of a pain to write. This issue of AmigaGuide files is going to keep >coming up and a reasonable solution is a simple hypertext program for dos. Seems I have to spent some time on my Guide reader for MSDOS. I have a working version which reads 99% of all available AmigaReport guide files but on complex guide files like the last 4 IML archives it completely chokes. Also the links are displayed with two characters like , which I want to change to something more button like. Sounds like a good idea ? Let me know (on the IML) Greetings Joop @{" Thread 281" link IML-281} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-286 " MSG-286 Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site @toc contents Subject: Re: Imagine WWW site Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 17:46:50 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrey Z? wrote; [snip] >> Maybe even such a 'monthly competition' as povray.org has (if you haven't >> seen it: a new subject every month, artists post their work, a jury >> decides wich images are best, images are put on a web-site). >Thanks for giving me some ideas. I will definitely get to implementing >all of them. I was also going to do something like texture >previewing... Description of each texture and a small image showing >what the texture should look like. That should be interesting. Good! >Who would decide which image is the best? If I remember correctly the povray-version-administator selects three people (I don't know how) to vote for their favourite images. Every jury-member selects 5 images, grades them 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 point. The image that get's most points win. (Easy, isn't it?) Conny Joensson @{" Thread 333" link IML-333} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-287 " MSG-287 Subject: Itty, bitty tidbit ... @toc contents Subject: Itty, bitty tidbit ... Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 18:56:20 From: Steve NACAD::Sherman LKG2-A/R5 pole AA2 DTN 226-6992 14-Feb-19 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Forgive me if this is mentioned elsewhere, but I didn't remember this trick and didn't see it in the manual. Could be something to add to the coming hint sheet or whatever. Probably an old trick to most of you ... If you have a sphere primitive (no faces) and want to convert it to a sphere with points and faces, use Split. Steve @{" Thread 244" link IML-244} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-288 " MSG-288 Subject: Re: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: IML Tidbits Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 21:23:59 From: cjo@esrange.ssc.se ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi everybody. Remember the mail I wrote about you should send me an email if you were interested in a ftp- or web-site for the Imagine tidbits? I wrote that last Friday, today is Tuesday, I have received 15 direct answers to that mail (even though it has been weekend, IML-activity is always low on weekends) and another 40 (about the tidbits and www...) have been posted here on the list. And considering how many of the 5-600 IML members that actually post to the list... I'd say that is enough interest that it should be a go. There also seems to be another couple of guy's here on the IML that seems interested in administrating such a thing (Shane? Andrey?), if you please! Also, someone (Walter Turberville) has already made a html-version of the Imagine textures description. It's available as; "http://www.PrimeNet.Com:80/~wturber/imgntxtr.html". Check it out. His homepage is one step up (is skip the "imgntxtr.html"-bit). Conny Joensson ** .sig under reconstruction ** @{" Thread 218" link IML-218} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-289 " MSG-289 Subject: Re: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... @toc contents Subject: Re: WANTED:F1 Car and Guitar models... Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 22:08:34 From: leyen@inf.ufrgs.br (Christian Leyen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- There MacLaren F1 car on Aminet. Christian Leyen (leyen@inf.ufgrs.br) @{" Thread 170" link IML-170} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-290 " MSG-290 Subject: Re: Mouse.SYS trouble @toc contents Subject: Re: Mouse.SYS trouble Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 22:46:03 From: joec@ensoniq.com (Joe Cotellese) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >ANY hint about like troubles and how to cope with them are welcome. Until then >I have stopped to fight with this stubborn piece of software (feel like the >poor boy who is standing in front of the candy store with all the goodies outa >reach); IMAGINE should get a prize for taxing the patience of even the hardest >3D modeling aficionado ... 8-(( > >Sorry, didn't want to hurt anybody's feelings about his dearest toy ;-). I know >you are a resourceful bunch who has given a helping hand whenever you could ... > I had some trouble when I first purchased Imagine PC with the mouse as well. My system didn't reboot but the movement was very erratic. What my solution ended up being was to remove any memory managers from my system (EMM or QEMM). I created a multiboot option for Imagine. From memory my Imagine PC setup looks something like CONFIG.SYS device=c:\dos\himem.sys dos=high AUTOEXEC.BAT @echo off \mouse\mouse.exe \dos\mscdex Finally, it looks like you are using the .SYS version of your mouse driver. I am using the .EXE version of my mouse driver. I have a MS Mouse software version 9.something. Give the .EXE version of your driver a shot. Joe C. @{" Thread 65" link IML-65} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-291 " MSG-291 Subject: Re: Attitudes @toc contents Subject: Re: Attitudes Date: Tuesday, 14 February 1995 23:55:08 From: Douglas Rudd ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > On 16 December 1994, Mike Halvorson wrote: > > > > > From: Mike Halvorson > > To: Stethem Ted > > Subject: Attitudes > > Date: Friday, December 16, 1994 8:33PM > > > > Ted, > > > > Rather wonder what Mike actually said. Since he didn't post this to IML, it must have been from private communication. Might have been nicer to just say and forego the editoral. This one is mine. > > Again. > > > Ted's comments removed: we have seen them once already. This could be likened to what was sometimes done in the broadcast industry, when they received an open ended interview from a personality they didn't like. Since there was no opportunity for interactive rebuttal, one could have a field day with them at their expense, if so desired. Mike Halvorson has sent me email sometimes discussing issues such as new products that I don't feel I am free to open up to the IML as I assumed the communication was confidential. Just a question of ethics. It may seem that I'm taking sides. Not really. It is my own sense of fair play, which I know some of the more vocal on IML disagree with. So be it. Doug Rudd ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Okay, let's take off your engineering hats, put on your management hats and make the right decision". Morton Thiekol, O-dark hundred, 28 January 1986 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ @{" Thread 353" link IML-353} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-292 " MSG-292 Subject: Dust? @toc contents Subject: Dust? Date: Wednesday, 15 February 1995 00:07:18 From: Mike McCool ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please excuse the intromission of a non-Imagine utility here--but as it does use tddd objects, I thought I might try and get away with it. Has anybody gotten this delicious looking program to work? I thought I was home free, when it claimed that, because of all the online help being in English, I needn't worry about the German dox. I know I'm spoiled with Imagine's friendly gui--but I think even the POVrayers might find DUST a bit enigmatic. I can't even get to first base . . . Again, thanks for your indulgence in this only slightly Imagine-related topic. @{" Thread 377" link IML-377} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-293 " MSG-293 Subject: Re: Exelent gifs @toc contents Subject: Re: Exelent gifs Date: Wednesday, 15 February 1995 01:34:49 From: Marty Nussbaum ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, 14 Feb 1995 Callace@aol.com wrote: > Is anybody interested in 20 best Gifs I've ever traced? > If you do let me know. > Later . > Sure, send 'em on down. *************** _ _ /| * ACK!! * \'o.O' * Hairball! * =(___)= *************** U @{" Thread 366" link IML-366} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-294 " MSG-294 Subject: Re: Re[2]: IML Tidbits @toc contents Subject: Re: Re[2]: IML Tidbits Date: Wednesday, 15 February 1995 03:04:57 From: Lord Hades ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi...if someone could get me, as alan said, ag specs + some samples, I would be willing to take a shot at a dos-based viewer...unfor. i don't have that much time, so it would have to be a 'weekend project' anyway, my email address is cfabian@cap.gwu.edu (this one at interport won't work for long) --chris @{" Thread 303" link IML-303} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-295 " MSG-295 Subject: Bones help.... @toc contents Subject: Bones help.... Date: Wednesday, 15 February 1995 07:36:11 From: "Bruce Marsh(ART)" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Is there a good bones tutorial innexistence? I thrashed thru it last year, with about 5 calls to Impulse, and got it to work....but I've forgotten the drill and found the manual a bit confusing...... Any help much appreciated. Bruce. @{" Thread 392" link IML-392} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-296 " MSG-296 Subject: Re: Mouse.SYS trouble (+start-up files) @toc contents Subject: Re: Mouse.SYS trouble (+start-up files) Date: Wednesday, 15 February 1995 09:44:57 From: Shane Davison ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Cotellese wrote: > I had some trouble when I first purchased Imagine PC with the mouse as well. > My system didn't reboot but the movement was very erratic. What my solution > ended up being was to remove any memory managers from my system (EMM or > QEMM). I created a multiboot option for Imagine. From memory my Imagine PC > setup looks something like [snip] It seems that quite a few Imagine PC users are using this multiboot setup. Undoubtedtly, it is better than modifying the files manually before re- booting or having two separate sets of startup files but I'm wondering why very few people have mentioned a solution that allows everything to run without rebooting (Imagine, Windows, etc.). Although there have been times when it would have made things easier. I have never used this multiboot facility. I have DOS 6.2 and here are the important startup lines: CONFIG.SYS: DEVICE=C:\DOS\HIMEM.SYS DEVICE=C:\DOS\EMM386.EXE RAM That's it ! And make sure you run Imagine with the -noxms switch. I don't have anything else fancy in there and I run every application without any problems (and without rebooting). Hope it works for you. -- Shane Davison (tsml) daviso@cs.uregina.ca @{" Thread 302" link IML-302} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-297 " MSG-297 Subject: GVP&Imagine @toc contents Subject: GVP&Imagine Date: Wednesday, 15 February 1995 11:54:12 From: m.rubin9@genie.geis.COM ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I've finally gotten my GVP 40Mhz '040 to work with Imagine. Unfortunately it often crashes when I'm saving an object and occasionally when I'm rendering. It's not related to object or file size. Anyone have any suggestions? A3000 w/10Megs. Floater @{" Thread 304" link IML-304} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-298 " MSG-298 Subject: Re: Lha Archives @toc contents Subject: Re: Lha Archives Date: Wednesday, 15 February 1995 12:15:44 From: MGL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 10 Feb 1995, Jeremy Peter Hopkin wrote: > > When I download Imagine objects, attributes and textures from the Aminet sites , > they are usually all archived using lha. > > Unfortuanely when I try to decompress them, I receive error messages, > along the lines of, "corrupted data" and "extranious data". > > I am using an Amiga A1500, and lha v1.38. Other lha files I can read, > but most of the stuff from Aminet gives me the same error messages. > > Can anyone help me? > > Jeremy > > > make sure you use the 'bi'nary option in your ftp. what is an A1500? you all should get amosaic and hit aminet from there- it lets you have a personal page of recent uploads. the aminet search page is awesome too. (and fast) ------------------------------------------------------------------- M G L phat 3D renders mischa@cats.ucsc.edu ------------------------------------------------------------------- @{" Thread 235" link IML-235} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-299 " MSG-299 Subject: Thanks @toc contents Subject: Thanks Date: Wednesday, 15 February 1995 12:43:59 From: peter.borcherds@beect.iaccess.za (Peter Borcherds) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi there This is a thank-you to all the people who replied to my request for locomotive objects. Unfortunately, LD phone costs are VERY expensive here in South Africa, so much to my dismay I won't be able to take up Mike van der Sommen's offer to call him at his GraFX Haus BBS. So, if there are any Imagineers in South Africa who know where I can get either the 3DROM #2 (from Syndesis) and/or the LightROM CD please let me know. Thanks guys! Cheers Peter Borcherds peter.borcherds@beect.iaccess.za ** UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY - PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHAREWARE CONCEPT ** --- | AmiQWK 2.3 | @{" Thread 158" link IML-158} @{" -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=- " link contents} @endnode @node IML-300 " MSG-300 Subject: Tunnel trouble @toc contents Subject: Tunnel trouble Date: Wednesday, 15 February 1995